首页
登录
职称英语
The question of whether our government should promote science and technology
The question of whether our government should promote science and technology
游客
2023-06-26
36
管理
问题
The question of whether our government should promote science and technology or the liberal arts in higher education isn’t an either/or proposition(命题), although the current emphasis on preparing young Americans for STEM(science, technology, engineering, maths)-related fields can make it seem that way.
The latest congressional report acknowledges the critical importance of technical training, but also asserts that the study of the humanities(人文学科)and social sciences must remain central components of America’s educational system at all levels. Both areas are critical to producing citizens who can participate effectively in our democratic society, become innovative(创新的)leaders, and benefit from the spiritual enrichment that the reflection on the great ideas of mankind over time provides.
Parents and students who have invested heavily in higher education worry about graduates’ job prospects as technological advances and changes in domestic and global markets transform professions in ways that reduce wages and cut jobs. Under these circumstances, it’s natural to look for what may appear to be the most "practical" way out of the problem; "Major in a subject designed to get you a job" seems the obvious answer to some, though this ignores the fact that many disciplines in the humanities characterized as "soft" often, in fact, lead to employment and success in the long run. Indeed, according to surveys, employers have expressed a preference for students who have received a broadly-based education that has taught them to write well, think critically, research creatively, and communicate easily.
Moreover, students should be prepared not just for their first job, but for their 4th and 5th jobs, as there’s little reason to doubt that people entering the workforce today will be called upon to play many different roles over the course of their careers. The ones who will do the best in this new environment will be those whose educations have prepared them to be flexible. The ability to draw upon every available tool and insight—picked up from science, arts, and technology—to solve the problems of the future, and take advantage of the opportunities that present themselves, will be helpful to them and the United States. [br] What kind of job applicants do employers look for?
选项
A、Those who have a strong sense of responsibility.
B、Those who are good at solving practical problems.
C、Those who are likely to become innovative leaders.
D、Those who have received a well-rounded education.
答案
D
解析
语义理解题。文中明确指出,雇主更青睐那些接受了综合性教育的学生,他们擅长写作,批判性地思考问题,创新性地进行研究,而且易于沟通。well-rounded同broadly—based意思相似,故答案为D)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2785253.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Allthepeoplecanteachyousomething,whethertheyhaveenj
[originaltext]Allthepeoplecanteachyousomething,whethertheyhaveenj
[originaltext]TheFederalAviationAdministration,orFAA,thegovernmenta
[originaltext]W:Goodmorning.Dr.Smith.I’mnotsurewhetheryoucanhelpme
[originaltext]W:Goodmorning.Dr.Smith.I’mnotsurewhetheryoucanhelpme
[originaltext]Chinesegovernmentisreadytocarryoutitsfirstnationals
中国政府对计划生育政策进行了修改完善。TheChinesegovernmenthasmodifiedthefamilyplanningpolic
[originaltext]Whetherit’scurledup,flatonthestomachorstretchedout
[originaltext]Whetherit’scurledup,flatonthestomachorstretchedout
[originaltext]Whetherit’scurledup,flatonthestomachorstretchedout
随机试题
Researchersconditionedagroupoffliestoassociateaparticularodorwithaw
WhenaNewYorkerwashikinginEurope,hisSwissfriendkeptsaying"Listen
All【C1】______thingsmustfighttostayalive.Theyhavetofeedonsomething
Inrecentyears,thelivingstandardoftheChinesepeoplehasbeenmarkedlyimpr
沉降系数是指单位离心力作用下溶质颗粒沉降的速度。沉降系数用Svedberg常数表
关于RPA卡环叙述错误的是()A.RPA卡环的近中支托、邻面板的设计
财务报表常用的比较分析方法包括( )。 Ⅰ.确定各因素影响财务报表程度的比较
关于镰状细胞贫血的叙述,不正确的是( )。A.常染色体显性遗传疾病 B.主要
不属于庆大霉素的抗菌谱内的病原菌的是A.变形杆菌B.链球菌C.大肠埃希菌D.铜绿
下列关于客户需求调查相关的说法,不正确的是()。A.理财业务的出发点是客户需求
最新回复
(
0
)