首页
登录
职称英语
The question of whether our government should promote science and technology
The question of whether our government should promote science and technology
游客
2023-06-26
34
管理
问题
The question of whether our government should promote science and technology or the liberal arts in higher education isn’t an either/or proposition(命题), although the current emphasis on preparing young Americans for STEM(science, technology, engineering, maths)-related fields can make it seem that way.
The latest congressional report acknowledges the critical importance of technical training, but also asserts that the study of the humanities(人文学科)and social sciences must remain central components of America’s educational system at all levels. Both areas are critical to producing citizens who can participate effectively in our democratic society, become innovative(创新的)leaders, and benefit from the spiritual enrichment that the reflection on the great ideas of mankind over time provides.
Parents and students who have invested heavily in higher education worry about graduates’ job prospects as technological advances and changes in domestic and global markets transform professions in ways that reduce wages and cut jobs. Under these circumstances, it’s natural to look for what may appear to be the most "practical" way out of the problem; "Major in a subject designed to get you a job" seems the obvious answer to some, though this ignores the fact that many disciplines in the humanities characterized as "soft" often, in fact, lead to employment and success in the long run. Indeed, according to surveys, employers have expressed a preference for students who have received a broadly-based education that has taught them to write well, think critically, research creatively, and communicate easily.
Moreover, students should be prepared not just for their first job, but for their 4th and 5th jobs, as there’s little reason to doubt that people entering the workforce today will be called upon to play many different roles over the course of their careers. The ones who will do the best in this new environment will be those whose educations have prepared them to be flexible. The ability to draw upon every available tool and insight—picked up from science, arts, and technology—to solve the problems of the future, and take advantage of the opportunities that present themselves, will be helpful to them and the United States. [br] What kind of job applicants do employers look for?
选项
A、Those who have a strong sense of responsibility.
B、Those who are good at solving practical problems.
C、Those who are likely to become innovative leaders.
D、Those who have received a well-rounded education.
答案
D
解析
语义理解题。文中明确指出,雇主更青睐那些接受了综合性教育的学生,他们擅长写作,批判性地思考问题,创新性地进行研究,而且易于沟通。well-rounded同broadly—based意思相似,故答案为D)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2785253.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Allthepeoplecanteachyousomething,whethertheyhaveenj
[originaltext]Allthepeoplecanteachyousomething,whethertheyhaveenj
[originaltext]TheFederalAviationAdministration,orFAA,thegovernmenta
[originaltext]W:Goodmorning.Dr.Smith.I’mnotsurewhetheryoucanhelpme
[originaltext]W:Goodmorning.Dr.Smith.I’mnotsurewhetheryoucanhelpme
[originaltext]Chinesegovernmentisreadytocarryoutitsfirstnationals
中国政府对计划生育政策进行了修改完善。TheChinesegovernmenthasmodifiedthefamilyplanningpolic
[originaltext]Whetherit’scurledup,flatonthestomachorstretchedout
[originaltext]Whetherit’scurledup,flatonthestomachorstretchedout
[originaltext]Whetherit’scurledup,flatonthestomachorstretchedout
随机试题
IknewamanwhocollectedEnglishwords.Helivedinanupturnedwatertank
【B1】[br]【B7】[originaltext]Asummaryofthephysicalandchemicalnatureofli
A、Hewilllosehislicenseforayear.B、Hecanonlydriveonspecificroads.C、
一、考题回顾 题目:《单摆》 内容 3.基本要求: (1)有实验的要
在场地分析过程中,基于BIM技术结合()可对现场及拟建建筑物空间进行建模分析,结
假定“badminton”是一个生词,你想结合实物用英语向学生解释该词,你
不符合急性型特发性血小板减少性紫癜(ITP)的是A.发病前常有上呼吸道感染B.常
在华盛顿会议上,美英支持中国要求的意图是()A.削弱日本在华势力 B.维护中国
某合伙企业原有合伙人3人,后古某申请入伙,当时合伙企业负债20万元。入伙后,合伙
施工单位承接了某国道的交通安全设施项目施工,起讫桩号K296+400~K316+
最新回复
(
0
)