首页
登录
职称英语
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why ar
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why ar
游客
2024-08-03
9
管理
问题
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish government’s now infamous, since "fat tax" has caused an international uproar. It’s praised by public health advocates on the one hand and dismissed on the other as nanny-state social engineering gone violent.
I see it as one country’s attempt to stave off rising obesity(肥胖症)rates, when other options seem less feasible. But the policies appear confusing. Why Denmark of all places? Why particular foods? Will such taxes really change eating behaviour? And aren’t there better ways to halt or reverse rising rates of diet-related chronic(慢性的)disease?
Before getting to these questions, let’s look at what Denmark has done. In 2009, its government announced a major tax overhaul aimed at softening the shock of the global economic crisis, promoting renewable energy, protecting the environment, discouraging climate change, and improving health—all while maintaining revenues, of course. The tax reforms make it more expensive to produce products likely to harm the environment and to consume products potentially harmful to health, specifically tobacco, ice cream, chocolate, candy, sugar-sweetened soft drinks, and foods containing lots of fats.
Taxes pay for this through policies that maintain a relatively narrow gap between the incomes of rich and poor. Because its level of income disparity(差异)is relatively low, the effects of health taxes are less hard on the poor that in many other countries. But the Danes want their health to be better. Life expectancy in Denmark is 79 years, at least two years below that in Japan or Iceland. The stated goal of the tax policies is to increase life expectancy as well as to reduce the burden and cost of illness from diet-related diseases. [br] What was the aim of the major tax overhaul of Denmark in 2009?
选项
A、Decreasing the chronic disease rate.
B、Softening the shock of the global economic crisis.
C、Prohibiting the production of unhealthy food.
D、Changing medical conditions.
答案
B
解析
由题干中的aim,the major tax,Denmark in 2009定位到第三段第二句。该句指出,2009年丹麦政府宣布进行税收制度的全面改革,旨在缓解全球经济危机带来的打击、鼓励使用再生能源、保护环境、减缓气候变化并改善人们的健康状况,由此看出B)最符合文意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3703497.html
相关试题推荐
Thecomponentofthehealthypersonalitythatisthefirsttodevelopisthe
Thecomponentofthehealthypersonalitythatisthefirsttodevelopisthe
Thecomponentofthehealthypersonalitythatisthefirsttodevelopisthe
Thecomponentofthehealthypersonalitythatisthefirsttodevelopisthe
Thecomponentofthehealthypersonalitythatisthefirsttodevelopisthe
Thecomponentofthehealthypersonalitythatisthefirsttodevelopisthe
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
Healthyguiltisawarningsignalthateithersomethingdangerousisaboutt
随机试题
California,bysomemeasuresAmerica’smost【C1】______state,isatthesame
Playisthe【C1】______businessofchildhood.Fromearliestinfancy,everychi
Yousendyourchildrenofftoschoolandputthemintheteacher’shands.Didy
Amongvariousdivisionsoflearningstrategies,thosebyChamot(1986)andOxfo
患者,女性,30岁,患肺结核5年余,今日呼吸道感染后症状加重,咯鲜血数次,一天内
基于双馈感应发电机的变速风电机组与基于同步发电机的变速风电机组都属于()的风电
烧伤后体液渗出的特点,下列错误的是A.伤后6~8小时达高峰 B.伤后2~3小时
良好测验的标准是什么
下列各项中,影响企业薪酬制度制定的外在因素是( )。A.企业的业务性质 B.
按目前国际上通行的分类方式,工程项目组织结构的基本形式可以分成项目式、职能式、矩
最新回复
(
0
)