Text 3 University used to be for a privi

题库2022-08-02  37

问题 Text 3 University used to be for a privileged few.In some countries it is now almost a rite of passage.Although that is excellent news,rew countries have worked out how to pay for it.In some of continental Europe,where the state often foots the bill,the result has usually been under investment.In America,where students themselves pay,many have little choice but to take on huge debts.English policymakers thought they had struck the right balance,with a mix of student fees and generous state loans.But,nearly two decades after youngsters were first required to contribute to tuition costs,the system has dwindling support at home.Jeremy Corbyn,Labour's leader,speaks as though it were designed to keep the poor from spoiling the ivory towers.He has called for an end to the"debt burden"on students,and has claimed that"fewer working-class young people are applying to university,"Labour's showing at the recent election suggests many young voters agree.Mr Corbyn's argument betrays a disregard for the facts and a poor understanding of student finance.Twenty years ago English students could go to university free,with the state covering the cost.The result was many struggling institutions and strict limits on the numbers of students universities were allowed to take.Annual tuition fees allowed an expansion of higher education,from around 30%of 18-year-olds to more than 40%-and the proportion of youngsters going to university from poor parts of the country has grown from one-in-ten to three-in-ten.That is because loans for tuition are combined with gentle repayment terms.Graduates only pay back based on their income above£21,000 a year,meaning that their debts never become unmanageable.Outstanding loans are written off after 30 years.Critics argue that tuition fees aggravate inequality between generations(rich oldsters attended university free,after all),but the alternative would be greater inequality within generations-as poorer students were once again frozen out when capacity fell,and relatively wealthy graduates were subsidised from general taxation.The real problem with the English system is not fairness,but that fees have not driven up standards.Almost all universities charge the maximum,whatever the course-not because they are a"cartel",but because no university wants to suggest that it offers a cut-price,second-rate degree.Nevertheless,surveys indicate that students have seen little improvement in teaching.One answer would be to promote competition by giving students better information.The government has relaxed the rules for new institutions in the hope that they will develop new teaching methods and drive down prices.It could also encourage students to hold universities to account,with devices such as learning contracts specifying what undergraduates should expect,and by helping them switch courses if they are dissatisfied.If students think they are not getting value for money,support for a scheme that is fair and progressive will dwindle.And that could lead to the most regressive step of all:scrapping tuition fees.Which of the following contributes to higher teaching standards?A.Promoting competition among students.B.Updating teaching devices.C.Empowering students.D.Raising tuition fees.

选项 A.Promoting competition among students.
B.Updating teaching devices.
C.Empowering students.
D.Raising tuition fees.

答案 C

解析 [信息锁定]末段就如何提升大学教学给出建议,其中③句指出:政府(It回指The government)还应采取一些手段来鼓励学生要求学校负责,比如要求学校与学生签订明确学生需求的合约、当学生不满意时帮助他们调整课程,言外之意即,政府应该赋予学生更多权力、学校应该承担更多责任来促使学校提高教学水平,因此C.正确。[解题技巧]A.将末段首句作者建议“通过给予学生更多信息来加强高校间的竞争”篡改为“加强学生之间的竞争”;B.根据部分信息develop new teaching methods、个别词汇devices以及常识“更新教学设施一定程度上有助于提升教学水平”设置于扰,但这并非作者建议,且文中devices也并非“教学设施”之意,而是意为“(赋予学生权力所采取的)方式、手段”;D.利用末段末句词汇tuition fees反向干扰,与第五段内容“高额学费并未促使大学提升教学水平”明显相悖。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/xueli/2700178.html

最新回复(0)