Text 2 Over the past decade,thousands of

资格题库2022-08-02  23

问题 Text 2 Over the past decade,thousands of patents have been granted for what are called business methods.Amazon.com received one for its"one-click"online payment system.Merrill Lynch got legal protection for an asset allocation strategy.One inventor patented a technique for lifting a box.Now the nation's top patent court appears completely ready to scale back on business-method patents,which have been controversial ever since they were first authorized 10 years ago.In a move that has intellectual-property lawyers abuzz the U.S.court of Appeals for the federal circuit said it would use a particular case to conduct a broad review of business-method patents.In re Bilski,as the case is known,is"a very big deal",says DennisD.Crouch of the University of Missouri School of law.It"has the potential to eliminate an entire class of patents."Curbs on business-method claims would be a dramatic about-face,because it was the federal circuit itself that introduced such patents with its 1998 decision in the so-called state Street Bank case,approving a patent on a way of pooling mutual-fund assets.That ruling produced an explosion in business-method patent filings,initially by emerging internet companies trying to stake out exclusive rights to specific types of online transactions.Later,more established companies raced to add such patents to their files,if only as a defensive move against rivals that might beat them to the punch.In 2005,IBM noted in a court filing that it had been issued more than 300 business-method patents despite the fact that it questioned the legal basis for granting them.Similarly,some Wall Street investment films armed themselves with patents for financial products,even as they took positions in court cases opposing the practice.The Bilski case involves a claimed patent on a method for hedging risk in the energy market.The Federal circuit issued an unusual order stating that the case would be heard by all 12 of the court's judges,rather than a typical panel of three,and that one issue it wants to evaluate is whether it should"reconsider"its state street Bank ruling.The Federal Circuit's action comes in the wake of a series of recent decisions by the supreme Court that has narrowed the scope of protections for patent holders.Last April,for example the justices signaled that too many patents were being upheld for"inventions"that are obvious.The judges on the Federal circuit are"reacting to the anti-patent trend at the Supreme Court",says HaroldC.Wegner,a patent attorney and professor at George Washington University Law School.27.Which of the following is true of the Bilski case?A.Its ruling complies with the court decisionsB.It involves a very big business transactionC.It has been dismissed by the Federal CircuitD.It may change the legal practices in the U.S.

选项 A.Its ruling complies with the court decisions
B.It involves a very big business transaction
C.It has been dismissed by the Federal Circuit
D.It may change the legal practices in the U.S.

答案 D

解析 依据题干中的关键词Bilski case解答本题应定位到二段末句并结合四段的相关信息。二段末句讲到了Bilski case产生的影响“它有可能取消整个系列的专利”,而依据二段首句可知专利的授予是法庭的行为,由此可以推知,这会带来美国立法惯例的改变,再者四段二句指出了就Bilski case在法庭上听证形式的改变,再次验证了D项符合文意,为正确答案。A项在文中没有提及,B项是就二段倒数二句出现的big deal设置的干扰选项,但文中的意思是Bilski case是一个大案件,而没有说和transaction相关的信息;C项是就二段二句中的信息设置的干扰选项,此处只说对business-method patents进行broad review,并不能说其被驳回,因此C项属推理过度。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/xueli/2698404.html

最新回复(0)