首页
登录
职称英语
Whose Grave is This Anyway?There are many legends about the
Whose Grave is This Anyway?There are many legends about the
游客
2025-02-06
22
管理
问题
Whose Grave is This Anyway?
There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for thousands of years along the Nero River. In reality though, this silence has constantly been disturbed by a great variety of people. While considering their different motivations in doing so, we must examine whether disturbing the ancient tombs is justifiable or worthy of condemnation.
(A)
hen Howard Carter and his party opened the tomb of the Egyptian king Tutankhamen in 1922, there was rejoicing around the world.(B)
he tomb was largely intact and not seriously pillaged by ancient grave robbers, so it still contained the wonderful artifacts that had been buried with the young king more than three millennia earlier.(C)
Over the next several years Carter and his team systematically photographed and catalogued the objects from the tomb, then transported them to the Cairo Museum.(D)
There is a certain irony in this story that raises complex ethical questions. Why are Carter and his
party
not called grave robbers? Why are their actions in stripping the tomb acceptable—even praiseworthy—when similar behavior by common thieves would be deplored? No matter who opens a tomb and takes away its contents, that person is violating the intentions of
those
who sealed the tomb originally. No matter what the motivation, a human body that was meant to rest in peace for all time has been disturbed. Should this not make us feel uncomfortable?
From the beginning, some were uneasy about the propriety of unearthing Tutankhamen’s remains. When Lord Carnarvon, Carter’s sponsor, died suddenly from a mosquito bite, and several others connected with the project experienced tragedies, rumors arose about the "curse of King Tut". But Carter himself died peacefully many years later, and the talk subsided.
Perhaps it is the passage of time that transforms grave robbing into archaeology.
Carter would no doubt have been outraged if, say, his grandmother’s coffin had been dug up to strip the body of its jewelry. But after three thousand years Tutankhamen has no living relatives to protest his disturbance.
Perhaps it is a question of the words we use to describe such ancient finds. We speak of Tutankhamen’s "mummy", and mummy is a clean, historical-sounding word. Parents bring their children to museums to see the mummies and mummy cases. We can almost forget that a mummy is the embalmed body of a dead human being, pulled out of its coffin so that we can marvel at the coffin and sometimes the body itself.
Or, perhaps the difference between grave robbing and archaeology lies in the motives of the perpetrators. Common thieves are motivated by greed, by their quest for money to be made by selling stolen objects. Carter and his team did not sell the treasures from Tutankhamen’s tomb but stored them safely in the Cairo Museum, where art lovers from around the world can see them.
They
were, in effect, making a glorious gift to the people of our century and centuries to come(while at the same time, one must point out, acquiring significant glory for themselves).
The basic issue is a
clash
of cultural values. To the Egyptians, it was normal and correct to bury their finest artworks with the exalted dead. To us, the idea of all that beauty being locked away in the dark forever seems an appalling waste. We want to bring it into the light, to have it as part of our precious artistic
heritage
. Almost no one, having seen these magnificent treasures, would seriously propose they be put back in the tomb and sealed up.
In the end, inevitably, our cultural values will prevail simply because we are still here and the ancient Egyptians are not. After three thousand years, Tutankhamen’s grave really isn’t his anymore. Whether right or wrong, it belongs to us. [br] What can be inferred about the irony mentioned in Paragraph 3?
选项
A、Scientists and thieves both opened the coffins.
B、Only clever people could be this type of thief.
C、Nobody wants to be a thief but is forced to sometimes.
D、This kind of thief is respected by some people.
答案
A
解析
本题是推论题,主要考查考生能否根据文章内未明确阐明的信息作出推论的能力。题目问:第三段提到的故事具有讽刺意味,对此我们可以作出什么推论?在该段中作者提出了两个问题,即为什么Carter和他的队友没有被叫做盗墓者?为什么他们的盗墓行为能为人们所接受——甚至受到赞扬,而一般的盗墓者却要受到谴责?从这两个问题可知,这种讽刺意味在于,Carter和他的队友同一般的盗墓贼一样都打开了墓地,但是他们却没有被叫做贼,所以选A项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3944978.html
相关试题推荐
WhoseGraveisThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
Whatisintelligence,anyway?WhenIwasinthearmy,Ireceivedakindofa
Whatisintelligence,anyway?WhenIwasinthearmy,Ireceivedakindofa
Whatisintelligence,anyway?WhenIwasinthearmy,Ireceivedakindofa
TheCultureDebateintheUS:WhoseCultureIsThis,Anyway?
TheCultureDebateintheUS:WhoseCultureIsThis,Anyway?
TheCultureDebateintheUS:WhoseCultureIsThis,Anyway?
TheCultureDebateintheUS:WhoseCultureIsThis,Anyway?
TheCultureDebateintheUS:WhoseCultureIsThis,Anyway?
TheCultureDebateintheUS:WhoseCultureIsThis,Anyway?
随机试题
StatisticⅠ.Thedefendantisguiltyorno
Birdsthatareliterallyhalfasleep—withonebrainhemispherealertandt
[originaltext]W:I’mhavingtroublemakingendsmeet.IthinkIhavetomakean
下列哪项属于高危儿A.出生时Apgar评分为8分 B.母亲孕期吸烟、吸毒、酗酒
四川最有名的手杖产品有( )。A.剑阁县的剑杖 B.垫江县的棕竹杖 C.峨
某初一(三)班学生甲和学生乙因贪玩上网,上学迟到了半个小时,班主任王老师非常生气
2009年1月,王先生领取当月工资1800元,全年一次性奖金10000元,请问,
共用题干 Ifyoumadealistofallthejobs
1999-48.真武汤中配伍芍药的用意是 A.益阴和营B.益阴敛阴C.缓急
下列药物中不宜与碘化物、溴化物并用,以防产生毒副作用的有A.养血安神丸 B.朱
最新回复
(
0
)