首页
登录
职称英语
[originaltext]I: Good morning, listeners. Today, we are very happy to have Doct
[originaltext]I: Good morning, listeners. Today, we are very happy to have Doct
游客
2024-11-04
33
管理
问题
I: Good morning, listeners. Today, we are very happy to have Doctor Michael Williams to discuss evolution of language. Well, Michael.
M: Thank you. Very pleased to meet you all here.
I: Michael, there have been many theories about why languages change. Can you give us some examples, please?
M: Of course. The first established theory of language change is one of decay and decadence proposed in the 18th century view. Their reasoning is that the old Indo-European languages like Sanskrit, Greek and Latin all have complex declension and conjugation schemes. Overtime the number of cases dropped, and the modern Indo-European languages have far fewer cases for declension and conjugation. It is said that people get increasingly careless about their speech, so they are "decadent" and have allowed the once complex language to decay into such a "simple" language.
I: Sounds interesting.
M: But this "decadence" argument has one major flaw. Even though the number of declensions and conjugations has dwindled, other parts of speech such as particles and auxiliary verbs have evolved to take their place. Anything that can be expressed in the ancient tongue can still be expressed today. Ultimately, this theory is highly subjective, as it relies on personal opinions, not scientific facts, of what is "highly evolved" and what is "decadent". So, strictly speaking, this cannot be called scientific explanation.
I: Right. Is there any other theory?
M: The next theory, proposed by the Neogrammarians, is one of natural process. They stated that changes are automatic and mechanical, and therefore cannot be observed or controlled by the speakers of the language. They found that what to a human ear a single "sound" is actually a collection of very similar sounds. They call it "low-level deviation" from an "idealized form". They argue that language change is simply a slow shift of the "idealized form" by small deviations.
I: Are there any problems concerned with this theory, too?
M: Of course. The obvious problem here is that without some kind of reinforcement, the deviation might go back and forth and cancel out any change. Then the Neogrammarians patched this theory by adding reasons for reinforcing the deviation such as simplification of sounds, or children imperfectly learning the speech of their parents.
I: Simplification of sounds? Can you explain it a little further?
M: Sure. The simplification of sounds basically states that certain sounds are easier to pronounce than others, so the natural tendency of the speakers is to modify the hard-to-say sounds to easier ones. An example would be the English word "nuclear", which many people pronounce as "nucular".
I: But who knows which one is more difficult to pronounce, "nuclear" or "nucular"?
M: Exactly. Different people may give different answers. Simplification no doubt exists, but using it as a reason of language change is too subjective to be scientific. There is another problem with children incorrectly learning the language of their parents. Let’s take an extreme case in the form of immigrants. What is observed is that children of immigrants almost always learn the language of their friends at school regardless of the parents’ dialect or original language. Children of British immigrants in the United States, for example, nearly always speak with one of the many regional American accents. So in this case, the parents’ linguistic contribution becomes less important than the social group the child is in.
I: I agree. Any other theories?
1. Which one is NOT old Indo-European language?
2. What is the main problem with the theory of decay and decadence?
3. Which statement is WRONG according to decay and decadence theory of language?
4. Which can be the best example of simplification of sounds?
5. According to Michael, why do children of immigrants have problems in learning their mother tongue?
选项
A、The number of declensions has dwindled.
B、The number of conjugations has dwindled.
C、This theory is highly objective.
D、This theory is highly subjective.
答案
D
解析
细节题。受访者提到:Ultimately, this theory is highly subjective,as it relies on personal opinions,not scientific facts,of what is “highly evolved” and what is “decadent”.表明衰败论的主要问题是高度的主观性,因此选项D正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3830643.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]J:Becausein1987theDepartmentofEducationandScienceestabl
[originaltext]J:Becausein1987theDepartmentofEducationandScienceestabl
[originaltext]I:Goodmorning,everyone.TodayI’dliketointroduceProfessor
[originaltext]I:Goodmorning,everyone.TodayI’dliketointroduceProfessor
[originaltext]M:Thelasttheoryadvancedduringthelastcenturyisasocialo
[originaltext]M:Thelasttheoryadvancedduringthelastcenturyisasocialo
[originaltext]M:Thelasttheoryadvancedduringthelastcenturyisasocialo
[originaltext]I:Goodmorning,listeners.Today,weareveryhappytohaveDoct
[originaltext]J:Ohyes,theyhaveagymnasiumthattheguestscanuse.There’s
[originaltext]J:Ohyes,theyhaveagymnasiumthattheguestscanuse.There’s
随机试题
Biologically,thereisonlyonequalitywhichdistinguishesusfromanimals:
InpartsoftheArctic,thelandgradesintothelandfasticesoimperceptibly
Thehumandesireforcompanionshipmayfeelboundless,butresearchsuggests
《中华人民共和国药典》规定"溶解"指溶质1g能在溶剂多少毫升中溶解A.100~不
眩晕痰湿中阻证,若痰郁化火,应首选的方剂是A.龙胆泻肝汤 B.半夏厚朴汤 C
A.生铁落饮 B.癫狂梦醒汤 C.养心汤合越鞠丸 D.逍遥散合顺气导痰汤
电压互感器低压侧两相电压降为零,一相正常,一个线电压为零则说明()低压侧两相熔断
2020年11月,经统计可知,北京轨道交通路网运营线路达23条,总里程699.3
某水利枢纽工程总库容为9000万m3,装机容量33×104kw。其水库大坝为土石
关于涵洞底的构造说法,正确的是()A.没有相应措施时,洞底纵坡一般不宜大于6%
最新回复
(
0
)