首页
登录
职称英语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a
游客
2024-10-31
48
管理
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchman acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads— against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness toward individuals. [br] Which of the following is NOT true in Farwell’s case?
选项
A、Farwell was injured because he negligently ran his engine off the track.
B、Farwell would not have been injured if the switchman had been more careful.
C、The court argued that the victim had accepted the risk since he had willingly taken his job.
D、The court decided that the railroad should not be held responsible.
答案
A
解析
根据提示词“Farewell’s case”可在文章第三段找到相关信息。与原文比较可知,B、 C、D三项均符合文意;而A项所讲到的事故原因是错误的,事故是由于一个扳道工的过失造成的,而不是受害者自己。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3825801.html
相关试题推荐
AcenturyagointheUnitedStates,whenanindividualbroughtsuitagainsta
AcenturyagointheUnitedStates,whenanindividualbroughtsuitagainsta
AcenturyagointheUnitedStates,whenanindividualbroughtsuitagainsta
StudentsofUnitedStateshistory,seekingtoidentifythecircumstancesth
AlthoughtheUnitedStatescherishesthetraditionitisanationofsmall
AlthoughtheUnitedStatescherishesthetraditionitisanationofsmall
Beforethemid-1860’s,theimpactoftherailroadsintheUnitedStateswas
Beforethemid-1860’s,theimpactoftherailroadsintheUnitedStateswas
Beforethemid-1860’s,theimpactoftherailroadsintheUnitedStateswas
Agoodmarriagemeansgrowingasacouplebutalsogrowingasindividuals.
随机试题
Mollyhasalwaysbeena(n)______child;shebecomesiiieasily.A、delicateB、glo
Whatarethespeakerstalkingabout?[originaltext]M:Hello.HowcanIhelpyou
关于钢筋混凝土梁,下列叙述中不正确的是:( )A.少筋梁受弯时,钢筋应力过早出
关于开放式基金认购与开放式基金申购的差别,下列论述错误的是()。关于开放式基金
Thechangeinthatvillagewasmiraculou
民法法系的基础是A.普通法 B.日耳曼法 C.罗马法 D.海洋法
根据《公司法》的规定,下列关于有限责任公司股东的表述中,正确的有( )。A.股
在劳动资料中,最能标志生产力发展水平的因素是() A.仓储设备B.生产工具
下列对客户风险承受能力由强到弱的排序,不正确的是( )。A.根据就业状况,大企
甲企业系煤炭开采企业,2018年相关情况如下: (1)共计拥有土地65000平
最新回复
(
0
)