首页
登录
职称英语
A recent talk by games academic Jane McGonigal has re-ignited discussion on
A recent talk by games academic Jane McGonigal has re-ignited discussion on
游客
2024-09-28
28
管理
问题
A recent talk by games academic Jane McGonigal has re-ignited discussion on the role they play in our society. Traditionally, the debate has centered on whether they are "damaging" or merely "harmless fun". But McGonigal is a games advocate. Her belief is that games are actually good for us.
In order to solve the world’s most urgent problems, McGonigal says, we need to play more games because gaming creates people who are solution-focused, collaborative, optimistic and hard-working. This position is interesting, although open to the obvious critique that, unlike in-game challenges, real-world problems are not set up to be rewarding, interesting or even soluble, so framing them as a game is likely to lead nowhere. But there’s certainly potential in using game-like mechanics to encourage us to do things we otherwise might not want to: such as the S2H fitness monitor, which allows users to claim rewards for physical activity.
The wider point—whether playing games actually improves any of our skills—is still open for debate and research. Various studies have shown that playing certain games can increase players’ visual attention, fine motor skills and spatial reasoning. Intuitively, it is not surprising that practicing skills involving fast responses and complicated physical maneuvers might make us better at them.
But is this a reason to play games, or a useful position for gaming advocates? As a novelist, I’ve always found the idea of promoting reading because it improves cognitive skills deeply depressing. Reading is a wonderful thing not because it makes our brains better but because it is enjoyable, enriching and gives us new experiences: just like games.
Once someone has told you that something is good for you, it immediately becomes less attractive. I’m not sure it’s necessary to say that playing games will save the world or improve us. Can’t we just have fun? [br] Throughout the passage, the author is ______ in his attitude towards playing games.
选项
A、favorable
B、critical
C、neutral
D、hesitant
答案
A
解析
观点态度题。从全文来看,文章由McGonigal提出的玩游戏有益的观点引出对玩游戏的利与弊的探讨。文章最后一段指出作者对玩游戏是否能拯救整个世界或提升自己无可奉告,但是我们可以为了开心而玩,从而得知作者对玩电脑游戏是持一种支持的态度。因此选项A符合题意,同时排除其他三项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3778508.html
相关试题推荐
Itisrareforataleofacademicmismanagementinasmallinstitutiontogr
Itisrareforataleofacademicmismanagementinasmallinstitutiontogr
Thespeakerwasverygoodat______hisideasduringthediscussion.A、puttingasid
Aseriesofrobberies______recently.A、hasbeenreportedB、hasreportedC、have
In______oftherecentsurgeinassetpricesworldwide,thisissueneedsurgent
Arecentarticleinaweeklynewspaperwasheadedwithastriking______ofala
Arecentsurveyshowsthatmostadolescentseat______astheyactuallyneedeve
GreenteahasinrecentyearsattractedmuchattentionintheWestforawidera
Inrecentyearsmuchmoreemphasishasbeenput______developingthestudents’
TherecentannouncementthatGPs(全科医生)maysendpatientswithdepressionaway
随机试题
WhathaveUkraine’sNationallawmakersdemanded?[br][originaltext]Nation
舒适的comfortable;cozy
Thereisnownodoubtthattheworldisgettingwarmer.DatafromboththeS
与胆相表里的是A、心 B、脾 C、肺 D、肾 E、肝
患儿,男,10个月。采用牛乳喂养,未加辅食,因皮肤、黏膜苍白就诊。诊断为缺铁性贫
胰腺手术后的出血宜选用的止血药是A.噻氯匹定B.垂体后叶素C.鱼精蛋白D.氨甲苯
下列哪项属于水火共制法A.炒 B.蒸 C.炙 D.水飞
A.中国食品药品检定研究院 B.国家药典委员会 C.CFDA行政事项受理服务
麦肯锡公司提出的7s模型中,不属于企业成功的“软件”要素的是()。A.企业
对于长期慢性病人。宜采取的医患关系模式是A.共同参与型 B.合作一指导型 C
最新回复
(
0
)