A. compared B. delayed C. design D. discrepancy E. essential F

游客2024-09-07  10

问题    A. compared   B. delayed    C. design     D. discrepancy    E. essential
   F. fuel     G. goals     H. intended    I. noticeable     J. presumably
   K. primary    L. scores     M. stunt     N. unfortunately    O. utilize
   TV is so often a parent’s good friend, keeping kids happily occupied so the grownups can cook dinner, answer the phone, or take a shower. But, 【C1】______, that electronic babysitter is not an educational aid. According to a recent research, babies who watch TV are more likely to have 【C2】______ cognitive development and language at 14 months, especially if they’re watching programs 【C3】______ for adults and older children. It’s surprising that TV-watching made a difference at such a tender age.
   This new study followed 259 lower-income families in New York, most of whom spoke Spanish as their 【C4】______ language at home. Other studies examining higher-income families have come to the same conclusion: TV watching not only isn’t educational, but it seems to 【C5】______ babies’ development.
   Babies who watched 60 minutes of TV daily had developmental 【C6】______ one-third lower at 14 months than babies who weren’t watching that much TV. The 【C7】______ may be due to the fact that when kids and parents are watching TV, they’re missing out on talking, playing, and interactions that are 【C8】______ to learning and development.
   But what about "good" TV, like Sesame Street? The researchers didn’t find any pluses or minuses when 【C9】______ to non-educational programs designed for small children, like SpongeBob SquarePants. Earlier research by some of the same scientists has found that parents whose children watch non-educational TV programs like SpongeBob SquarePants spend less time reading to their children or teaching them. The latest study of educational TV programs like Sesame Street adds more 【C10】______ to a recommendation from the American Academy of Pediatrics that babies under age 2 should watch no TV at all. [br] 【C1】

选项

答案 N

解析 空格所在句句子成分完整,推测空格处填入副词。这种“电子保姆”并不能辅助教育,这是一个令人失望的事实。N项unfortunately“遗憾地”代入句中,符合文意。最后一句提到“2岁以下的婴儿根本不应该收看任何电视节目”,由此可知“电子保姆”并不能辅助教育是肯定地,presumably“大概”与文意不符。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3748201.html
最新回复(0)