首页
登录
职称英语
Public opinion is still largely unaware of or indifferent to the need to pre
Public opinion is still largely unaware of or indifferent to the need to pre
游客
2024-06-05
28
管理
问题
Public opinion is still largely unaware of or indifferent to the need to preserve rare species, whether for cultural or for scientific reasons. Some people indeed are actively hostile. Species have been dying out since life began, they argue, and have continuously been replaced by new species. Why, therefore, should we interfere with the process? Let us abandon to their fate the great Indian rhinoceros, the Arabian ostrich, the Tasmanian wolf, and all those other animals that cannot adapt themselves to the modern world. Others will arise to take their place.
But, of course, this argument has got its time-scale all wrong, It would take millions of years to evolve a set of new species to replace those we are now losing. In the meantime the world is filling up with the hardy and adaptable pests, rats and rabbits, starlings and house sparrows. The cultural argument for preserving wild life, that it is part of our natural heritage, argues itself, except to those who are blind to cultural values anyway, what is less obvious and more in need of explanation is the scientific case for preventing the extirpation of rare species.
In these days of torrential achievement in the physical sciences we are apt to forget that it is possible only because most of the basic thinking in the sciences has already been done. The seed has been sown and the fruit is now being harvested. Could that basic thinking have been brought to so triumphant a conclusion so early if the raw material, the fundamental physical phenomena, had been subjected to the sort of erosion and extinction that today constantly threatens the raw material of the biological sciences? Supposing the world stock of radium had gone the way of the dodo and the great auk by 1850. Who at that early date could have put up a sound argument in favor of conserving it if it had been known and in danger of destruction?
It is just this danger which now confronts the biological sciences, whose basic thinking is by no means yet done, but which hold the key to man’s achievement of a satisfactory mastery over both his nature and his nurture in the coming centuries. Animal and plants species are natural experiments in genetics and adaptation to environment that have taken millions of years to work out. Research as we may with fruit-flies, we can never catch up with nature. We have not the time. Is it not therefore folly to allow our vital experimental material to vanish through carelessness? [br] This passage aims to make the public aware of ______.
选项
答案
the importance to preserve the rare species
解析
文章先是说有人认为濒危物种不需保护,自然界自会产生新物种替代它们,后几段则反驳其论点并讲述了保护物种的重要性,文章的目的就应该是唤起大众保护物种的意识。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3621104.html
相关试题推荐
Theautomobileisthegreatestconsumerofpublicandpersonalspace.InLos
Homeschoolinghaslongbeenarefugeforparentsunhappywithpublicschool
Homeschoolinghaslongbeenarefugeforparentsunhappywithpublicschool
Inanorganisationwhoseemployeesareself-motivatingandlargelyself-direc
Inanorganisationwhoseemployeesareself-motivatingandlargelyself-direc
Inanorganisationwhoseemployeesareself-motivatingandlargelyself-direc
Inanorganisationwhoseemployeesareself-motivatingandlargelyself-direc
Inanorganisationwhoseemployeesareself-motivatingandlargelyself-direc
Inanorganisationwhoseemployeesareself-motivatingandlargelyself-direc
Inanorganisationwhoseemployeesareself-motivatingandlargelyself-direc
随机试题
Wecanseehoweveryphilosopherreflectsthesociallifeofhisday.Plato
Here’ssomegoodnewsforparentsoftweensandteens:yourule.Thatm
急性特发性血小板减少性紫癜叙述错误的是A.80%以上的病人起病前1~2周有上呼吸
A.全子宫切除术 B.全子宫及双附件切除术 C.全子宫、双附件及大网膜切除术
男性,30岁,黏液脓血便2年,下腹轻度疼痛,近日腹痛加重,高热,衰弱。体检:消瘦
重症肺炎与轻症肺炎的主要区别点在于是否出现A.发热 B.伴有循环、神经、消化等
或有事项准则规定的必须在会计报表附注中披露的或有负债包括() Ⅰ.已贴现商
下列有关燃气系统及设备说法错误的是( )。A.燃气具有较高的热能利用率 B.
下列不属于招聘过程中歧视现象的阶段的是()。A.发布招聘广告阶段的歧视 B.
根据基坑平面的大小与深度、土质、地下水位高低与流向、降水深度要求,轻型井点可以
最新回复
(
0
)