首页
登录
职称英语
[originaltext] Amid major cuts to public funding, political leaders have cit
[originaltext] Amid major cuts to public funding, political leaders have cit
游客
2024-04-30
41
管理
问题
Amid major cuts to public funding, political leaders have cited claims that money doesn’t affect student learning to show cutting billions of dollars in education is reasonable. But a new report exposes the money-means-education debate, saying that money does matter, and the common political wording has little basis on research. Friday’s report by the Albert Shanker Institute, titled "Revisiting the Age-Old Question: Does Money Matter in Education?", cites evidence that shows many of the ways in which schools currently spend money do improve student outcomes, and when schools have larger budgets, they’re authorized to spend more opportunistically and productively. Bruce Baker, a professor in the Graduate School of Education at Rutgers University, authors the report. The Shanker Institute is an independent nonprofit organization provided by the American Federation of Teachers. "In short, money, the resources that cost money and the more equitable distribution of school funding can improve outcome," Baker writes. "Policymakers would be well advised to rely on high-quality research to guide the critical choices they make regarding school finance." But this idea isn’t always reflected in practice, whether by necessity or ideology or both. A survey published last October by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities examined 46 states— where 95 percent of the country’s elementary and secondary students reside—and found that 37 have cut down the educational funding since the year before, after adjusting to inflation. Of those states, 19 cut funding by more than 5 percent. Looking back to before the recession, at least 30 states are funding schools at levels lower than they were in 2008.
23. What do the political leaders think of the money cutting in education?
24. What is the nature of the Shanker Institute?
25. What is the reason for cutting down the education funding?
选项
A、A private company.
B、A state-owned company.
C、An international profit organization.
D、An independent nonprofit organization.
答案
D
解析
综合理解题。短文中提到,Shanker Institute是一个由美国教师联合会资助的独立的非营利性机构。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3577373.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Amidmajorcutstopublicfunding,politicalleadershavecit
[originaltext]Amidmajorcutstopublicfunding,politicalleadershavecit
[originaltext]M:Kathy,chaostheoryseemstobeabranchofphysicsormathema
[originaltext]M:Kathy,chaostheoryseemstobeabranchofphysicsormathema
[originaltext]W:Oh,hello,John.Areyouusingyourdictatingmachinethismor
[originaltext]W:Oh,hello,John.Areyouusingyourdictatingmachinethismor
[originaltext]W:Oh,hello,John.Areyouusingyourdictatingmachinethismor
[originaltext]W:Oh,hello,John.Areyouusingyourdictatingmachinethismor
[originaltext]M:I’venevertastedsuchtastysoup.IwishIhadtherecipeand
[originaltext]M:I’venevertastedsuchtastysoup.IwishIhadtherecipeand
随机试题
Moreover,insofarasanyinterpretationofitsauthorcanbemadefromthe
Womensawlittleadvancementincorporateboardroomsandcompensationin201
[originaltext]Theexpression"athirstforknowledge"maysoonhaveanewme
学习间接经验反映了教学过程中认识对象的特点是()A.间接性 B.概括性 C
女,3岁,颈部肿物约1cm,稍高起于皮肤,圆形,边界不甚清楚,皮表正常。肿块呈青
无抗四环素的细菌培养感染了来自抗四环素细菌溶菌液的病毒。原培养的细菌的子代大多获
下列关于刑事诉讼法基本原则的表述,不正确的有:A.在刑事诉讼活动中,公安机关的活
下列哪种联合用药是通过一种药物对另一种药物的保护作用而增加疗效A.亚胺培南制剂中
下列哪些属于报检入境废物时应提供的单证()。 A.装运前检验证书B.进口废
张某等3人共同出资设立一个普通合伙企业,实缴出资比例为1:2:3。张某在执
最新回复
(
0
)