首页
登录
职称英语
[originaltext] Amid major cuts to public funding, political leaders have cit
[originaltext] Amid major cuts to public funding, political leaders have cit
游客
2024-04-30
31
管理
问题
Amid major cuts to public funding, political leaders have cited claims that money doesn’t affect student learning to show cutting billions of dollars in education is reasonable. But a new report exposes the money-means-education debate, saying that money does matter, and the common political wording has little basis on research. Friday’s report by the Albert Shanker Institute, titled "Revisiting the Age-Old Question: Does Money Matter in Education?", cites evidence that shows many of the ways in which schools currently spend money do improve student outcomes, and when schools have larger budgets, they’re authorized to spend more opportunistically and productively. Bruce Baker, a professor in the Graduate School of Education at Rutgers University, authors the report. The Shanker Institute is an independent nonprofit organization provided by the American Federation of Teachers. "In short, money, the resources that cost money and the more equitable distribution of school funding can improve outcome," Baker writes. "Policymakers would be well advised to rely on high-quality research to guide the critical choices they make regarding school finance." But this idea isn’t always reflected in practice, whether by necessity or ideology or both. A survey published last October by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities examined 46 states— where 95 percent of the country’s elementary and secondary students reside—and found that 37 have cut down the educational funding since the year before, after adjusting to inflation. Of those states, 19 cut funding by more than 5 percent. Looking back to before the recession, at least 30 states are funding schools at levels lower than they were in 2008.
23. What do the political leaders think of the money cutting in education?
24. What is the nature of the Shanker Institute?
25. What is the reason for cutting down the education funding?
选项
A、A private company.
B、A state-owned company.
C、An international profit organization.
D、An independent nonprofit organization.
答案
D
解析
综合理解题。短文中提到,Shanker Institute是一个由美国教师联合会资助的独立的非营利性机构。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3577373.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Amidmajorcutstopublicfunding,politicalleadershavecit
[originaltext]Amidmajorcutstopublicfunding,politicalleadershavecit
[originaltext]M:Kathy,chaostheoryseemstobeabranchofphysicsormathema
[originaltext]M:Kathy,chaostheoryseemstobeabranchofphysicsormathema
[originaltext]W:Oh,hello,John.Areyouusingyourdictatingmachinethismor
[originaltext]W:Oh,hello,John.Areyouusingyourdictatingmachinethismor
[originaltext]W:Oh,hello,John.Areyouusingyourdictatingmachinethismor
[originaltext]W:Oh,hello,John.Areyouusingyourdictatingmachinethismor
[originaltext]M:I’venevertastedsuchtastysoup.IwishIhadtherecipeand
[originaltext]M:I’venevertastedsuchtastysoup.IwishIhadtherecipeand
随机试题
ASports体育运动Manyanimalsengageinplay,butho
InChina,over84percentofemployerschosetogiveyear-endbonuses(奖
Accordingtothepassage,asurveyaboutbutterfliesiscarriedonby______.[or
TodayIwanttohelpyouwithastudyreadingmethodknownasSQ3R.Thelett
试述矩阵组织形式的主要特点。
()实现了我国太阳探测零的突破,标志着我国太空探测正式步入“探日”时代。A
下列不属于证券产品选择目标的是()。A.取得收益 B.提高风险 C.本金保
硫酸镁发挥导泻、利胆作用时应采用的给药途径是A.po. B.iv. C.外用
要获得任一种色调的混合色光,需要单色仪的台数至少是A.2台 B.3台 C.4
根据继承法规定,继承人所为的下列行为中,可导致其丧失继承权的有A.故意杀害被继承
最新回复
(
0
)