首页
登录
职称英语
[originaltext]The Food and Drug Administration is, again, threatening to impose
[originaltext]The Food and Drug Administration is, again, threatening to impose
游客
2024-02-21
25
管理
问题
The Food and Drug Administration is, again, threatening to impose milk and meat from cloned animals on a public that opposes the technology and its products.
Respected polls report that more than 60% of Americans think animal cloning is immoral, and that most people said they wouldn’t knowingly eat the products even if the FDA approved them. But because the FDA would allow cloned meat and milk to be sold without identifying labels, consumers wouldn’t be able to avoid them. The FDA has consistently tilted toward those who want cloned milk and meat in our food. Agency officials have repeatedly asserted that science shows cloned milk and meat are safe for humans. But the FDA has never published the complete scientific studies it says support that claim.
The argument that cloning is safe for animals is unconvincing. Cloned meat and milk offer no public economic benefits. Having cloned cows produce more milk wouldn’t reduce milk prices. U.S. farmers produce more milk than we drink, and the government is required to buy the surplus. Since 2000, dairy support programs have cost taxpayers more than $5 billion.
Most important, this first decision to advance animal biotechnology raises ethical issues beyond the FDA’s expertise. Techniques used to clone animals will advance the ability to clone humans — and create animals with human genes. Neither the agency nor animal scientists are qualified to tell us whether and when it is ethically acceptable for humans to alter the essential nature of animals. We need a national discussion, including ethicists and religious leaders, to consider the wisdom of cloned and transgenic animals. Given the risk of unintended consequences, we should proceed cautiously. The president should halt further FDA action on cloning and set in motion a process for beginning this broader discussion.
Questions 26 to 29 are based on the passage you have just heard.
26. What is the speaker’s attitude towards cloning?
27. Why do many people in U.S. buy cloned foods?
28. Which statement is true according to the passage?
29. What do we know about cloning technique from the passage?
选项
A、It may cause unintended bad results to human beings.
B、It is developed well enough to clone human beings.
C、It will bring more unexpected economic benefits.
D、It is supported by ethicists and religious leaders.
答案
A
解析
根据意思相反的两个选项中有一个很可能是正确答案的命题规律,将答案锁定在[A]和[C]之间。短文末尾提到,Given the risk of unintended consequences, we should proceed cautiously,由此可推断出,克隆产品可能会对人类产生难以预料的后果,故[A]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3469639.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]W:Dr.Smith.IneedtoaskyouaboutsomethinginChapter12.We
[originaltext]M:Hello!W:Hello.ThisisLilyWilson,MayIspeaktoTedRobi
[originaltext]M:Hello!W:Hello.ThisisLilyWilson,MayIspeaktoTedRobi
[originaltext]M:Mymanagersaidwe’regoingtohavesomelay-offssoon.W:Wil
[originaltext]M:Mymanagersaidwe’regoingtohavesomelay-offssoon.W:Wil
[originaltext]M:Mymanagersaidwe’regoingtohavesomelay-offssoon.W:Wil
[originaltext]M:Mymanagersaidwe’regoingtohavesomelay-offssoon.W:Wil
[originaltext]M:Hi,Claire.Howdoesitfeeltobebackoncampus?W:Gee,Hi,
[originaltext]M:Hi,Claire.Howdoesitfeeltobebackoncampus?W:Gee,Hi,
[originaltext]M:Hi,Claire.Howdoesitfeeltobebackoncampus?W:Gee,Hi,
随机试题
Personalityistoalargeextentinherent—A-typeparentsusuallybringabo
Onceuponatimeapoorfarmertakingasackofwheattothemilldidnotkno
在1到40的自然数中任意取两个不同的数,使得取出的两数之和是6的倍数。请问有多少
处理个人信息应当遵循的原则不包括()。A.合法原则 B.必要原则 C.
下列防止治安事故的措施中,正确的有( )。A.入住饭店时,导游人员应建议游客将
有关丙型肝炎,下列哪项是正确的()A.丙型肝炎病毒只能通过输血传播 B.
A.免疫防御B.免疫防御反应过高C.免疫自稳功能失调D.免疫监视功能失调E.免疫
成本预算的内容包括()和经营成本。A:生产成本B:管理成本C:劳务成本D:
Thechangeinthatvillagewasmiraculou
2020年12月31日,甲公司某项无形资产的原价为120万元,已摊
最新回复
(
0
)