首页
登录
职称英语
There is, writes Daniele Fanelli in a recent issue of Nature, something rott
There is, writes Daniele Fanelli in a recent issue of Nature, something rott
游客
2024-02-01
6
管理
问题
There is, writes Daniele Fanelli in a recent issue of Nature, something rotten in the state of scientific research—"an epidemic of false, biased, and falsified findings" where "only the most egregious cases of misconduct are discovered and punished." Fanelli is a leading thinker in an increasingly alarming field of scientific research: one that seeks to find out why it is that so much scientific research turns out to be wrong.
For a long time the focus has either been on industry funding as a source of bias, particularly in drug research, or on those who deliberately commit fraud, such as the spectacular case of Diederik Stapel, a Dutch social psychologist who was found to have fabricated at least 55 research papers over 20 years. But an increasing number of studies have shown that flawed research is a much wider phenomenon, especially in the biomedical sciences. Indeed, the investigation into Stapel also blamed a "sloppy" research culture that often ignored inconvenient data and misunderstood important statistical methods.
"There’s little question that the [scientific] literature is awash(充斥着)in false findings—findings that if you try to replicate you’ll probably never succeed or at least find them to be different from what was initially said," says Fanelli. "But people don’t appreciate that this is not because scientists are manipulating these results, consciously or unconsciously; it’s largely because we have a system that favors statistical flukes (侥幸) instead of replicable findings. "
This is why, he says, we need to extend the idea of academic misconduct (currently limited to fabrication, falsification, or plagiarism) to "distorted reporting"—the failure to communicate all the information someone would need to validate your findings. Right now, he says, we’re missing all the "unconscious biases, the systemic biases... the practices, mistakes, and problems that hardly ever count as cheating, even though they have a very important—and probably the largest—effect on creating technically false results in the literature. "
One particularly challenging bias is that academic journals tend to publish only positive results. As Isabelle Boutron, a professor of epidemiology at Ren6 Descartes University in Paris, points out, studies have shown that peer reviewers are influenced by trial results; one study showed that they not only favored a paper showing a positive effect over a near-identical paper showing no effect, they also gave the positive paper higher scores for its scientific methods. And Boutron has herself found extensive evidence of scientists spinning their findings to claim benefits that their actual results didn’t quite support.
"We need a major cultural change," says Fanelli. "But when you think that, even 20 years ago, these issues were practically never discussed, I think we’re making considerable progress." [br] Which of the following is true about Fanelli’s article in Nature?
选项
A、Some minor academic cheatings are allowed.
B、There are too many scientific research scandals to be reported all.
C、The outcomes of scientific research are unreliable.
D、It is inevitable to seek quick success.
答案
B
解析
细节题。根据题干锁定文章第一段。文中指出上报的虚假科研发现都是情形最恶劣的,而这些在科研领域已经屡见不鲜。因此正确答案选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3411748.html
相关试题推荐
Babyfatissomethingchildrenaresupposedtooutgrow,notgrowinto.The
Babyfatissomethingchildrenaresupposedtooutgrow,notgrowinto.The
Babyfatissomethingchildrenaresupposedtooutgrow,notgrowinto.The
Babyfatissomethingchildrenaresupposedtooutgrow,notgrowinto.The
Babyfatissomethingchildrenaresupposedtooutgrow,notgrowinto.The
Babyfatissomethingchildrenaresupposedtooutgrow,notgrowinto.The
Babyfatissomethingchildrenaresupposedtooutgrow,notgrowinto.The
MyfriendLeomakesupweakandpoorexcuseswheneverthereissomethinghe
MyfriendLeomakesupweakandpoorexcuseswheneverthereissomethinghe
MyfriendLeomakesupweakandpoorexcuseswheneverthereissomethinghe
随机试题
[originaltext]M:Excuseme,doestheexpresstrainleaveat2:05?W:No,at1:5
关于上述公文的发文机关署名和成文时间的说法,正确的是()。A.发文机关应署
如图所示电路,U=12V,UE=10V,R=0.4kΩ,则电流I等于: A
我国开放式基金的存续期为()。A.5年 B.15年 C.15年-50
桑寄生、五加皮除均可祛风湿外,还可以( )。A.清热安胎 B.利尿消肿 C
炉甘石洗剂属于混悬型液体制剂,制备时先将炉甘石、氧化锌与甘油研成糊状,加入羧甲基
(2019年真题)通货膨胀的基本标志是()。A.失业率上升 B.物价上涨
付款单据用来记录企业支付给供应商的款项。()
急性胰腺炎的临床表现
最新回复
(
0
)