首页
登录
职称英语
It’s been 30 years since Congress revised US patent laws to encourage un
It’s been 30 years since Congress revised US patent laws to encourage un
游客
2024-01-22
41
管理
问题
It’s been 30 years since Congress revised US patent laws to encourage universities to embrace the world of commerce. Critics predicted that the integrity of academic research would be compromised by patent-grubbing and attempts to build companies around the latest laboratory findings. But such fears did not come true, says a new report from the National Academies released Monday. The panel—chaired by Mark Wrighton, Chancellor of Washington University in St. Louis—examined a vast file of scholarly work on how universities have managed intellectual property in the wake of the 1980 Bayh-Dole Act and concluded that things are pretty much hunky-dory (令大家满意的) right now. Or, as the report says:
The Bayh-Dole legal framework and the practices of universities have not seriously undermined academic norms of uninhibited inquiry, open communication, or faculty advancement based on scholarly merit. There is little evidence that intellectual property considerations interfere with other important avenues of transferring research results to development and commercial use.
At the same time, however, the Academies’ panel warns universities not to go overboard hunting for patents. While some universities have made millions of dollars by licensing discoveries from their labs, raising money should not be the main goal. Instead, the report says, universities should aim to disseminate (传播) technology as widely as possible for the public good. This may mean passing up the best-paying licensing deal and taking one that allows for broader use of the technology. For most schools, it adds, the likelihood of "raising significant revenue" from patents is small, the probability of disappointment is high, and the risk of "distorting and narrowing" the use of new knowledge is great.
It’s important not to get carried away with racking up patents at the expense of the university’s primary obligation to disseminate new knowledge and technologies, says panel member David Korn, assistant provost (教务长) for research at Harvard University. A former dean of the Stanford University Medical School, Korn was involved in reviewing a set of high-minded guidelines for universities that were largely adopted by the panel. These "Nine Points to Consider in Licensing" were previously endorsed by the Association of University Technology Managers. [br] What is the result of the panel’s examination?
选项
A、The laws influence the academic norms just a little.
B、The laws interfere with the academic norms.
C、The laws cut the revenue of universities.
D、The laws prevent the universities’ development.
答案
A
解析
推理判断题。由定位句及定位段可知,专家小组对学术工作档案进行检查,发现《拜杜法案》的法律框架和大学的实际操作并没有严重地削弱不受查询限制的学术规范、言论自由和建立在学术价值基础上的全体教师的提升,即该法案并没有在很大程度上影响到学术标准,故A为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3385229.html
相关试题推荐
ShouldPrivateCarsBeEncouragedinChina?1.小汽车进入中国家庭后给人们带来了舒适和方便2.小汽车也给人们带来了
[originaltext]TheWorldSantaClausCongressisdesignedforpeoplewhoenjo
[originaltext]TheWorldSantaClausCongressisdesignedforpeoplewhoenj
[originaltext]TheWorldSantaClausCongressisdesignedforpeoplewhoenj
[originaltext]TheWorldSantaClausCongressisdesignedforpeoplewhoenj
[originaltext]TheWorldSantaClausCongressisdesignedforpeoplewhoenj
[originaltext]TheWorldSantaClausCongressisdesignedforpeoplewhoenjo
[originaltext]TheWorldSantaClausCongressisdesignedforpeoplewhoenjo
It’sbeen30yearssinceCongressrevisedUSpatentlawstoencourageun
It’sbeen30yearssinceCongressrevisedUSpatentlawstoencourageun
随机试题
[originaltext]Today,airtravelisfarsaferthandrivingacaronabusym
[originaltext]Givingagoodpresentationisallaboutthesimplethings—kno
B根据theoretically和personalizetheireducation定位到B段。原文说,多数利益相关者赞同,让学生有机会进行个性化的学习,从
对于建筑施工企业的分公司、区域公司等较大的分支机构应依据实际生产情况配置不少于(
票面金额为1000元的2年期债券,每年支付利息100元,到期收益率为6%,则市场
A.蓼科B.毛茛科C.石竹科D.苋科E.防己科威灵仙来源于()。
下列渠道权力类型中,()是指受影响者认识到影响者有明确的权力对其施加影响,并由
金融市场最主要、最基本的功能是()。A.货币资金融通 B.优化资源配置 C
方法研究是一种寻找最经济和最合理的工作程序和操作方法的管理技术,以下不属于方法研
采用移动加权平均法可以在月度内随时结转发出存货的成本。()
最新回复
(
0
)