首页
登录
职称英语
It’s been 30 years since Congress revised US patent laws to encourage un
It’s been 30 years since Congress revised US patent laws to encourage un
游客
2024-01-22
35
管理
问题
It’s been 30 years since Congress revised US patent laws to encourage universities to embrace the world of commerce. Critics predicted that the integrity of academic research would be compromised by patent-grubbing and attempts to build companies around the latest laboratory findings. But such fears did not come true, says a new report from the National Academies released Monday. The panel—chaired by Mark Wrighton, Chancellor of Washington University in St. Louis—examined a vast file of scholarly work on how universities have managed intellectual property in the wake of the 1980 Bayh-Dole Act and concluded that things are pretty much hunky-dory (令大家满意的) right now. Or, as the report says:
The Bayh-Dole legal framework and the practices of universities have not seriously undermined academic norms of uninhibited inquiry, open communication, or faculty advancement based on scholarly merit. There is little evidence that intellectual property considerations interfere with other important avenues of transferring research results to development and commercial use.
At the same time, however, the Academies’ panel warns universities not to go overboard hunting for patents. While some universities have made millions of dollars by licensing discoveries from their labs, raising money should not be the main goal. Instead, the report says, universities should aim to disseminate (传播) technology as widely as possible for the public good. This may mean passing up the best-paying licensing deal and taking one that allows for broader use of the technology. For most schools, it adds, the likelihood of "raising significant revenue" from patents is small, the probability of disappointment is high, and the risk of "distorting and narrowing" the use of new knowledge is great.
It’s important not to get carried away with racking up patents at the expense of the university’s primary obligation to disseminate new knowledge and technologies, says panel member David Korn, assistant provost (教务长) for research at Harvard University. A former dean of the Stanford University Medical School, Korn was involved in reviewing a set of high-minded guidelines for universities that were largely adopted by the panel. These "Nine Points to Consider in Licensing" were previously endorsed by the Association of University Technology Managers. [br] According to the panel’s suggestion, what should most universities do?
选项
A、They should try hard to invent patents.
B、They should develop the technology for themselves.
C、They should take the risk of licensing the patents.
D、They should spread the technology for broader use.
答案
D
解析
细节辨认题。由定位句可知,大学需要放弃最赚钱的注册交易而采用可以更广泛地使用科技的一种交易方式,高校应以传播新知识技术为首要职责。由此推知,D为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3385231.html
相关试题推荐
ShouldPrivateCarsBeEncouragedinChina?1.小汽车进入中国家庭后给人们带来了舒适和方便2.小汽车也给人们带来了
[originaltext]TheWorldSantaClausCongressisdesignedforpeoplewhoenjo
[originaltext]TheWorldSantaClausCongressisdesignedforpeoplewhoenj
[originaltext]TheWorldSantaClausCongressisdesignedforpeoplewhoenjoyp
[originaltext]TheWorldSantaClausCongressisdesignedforpeoplewhoenjo
[originaltext]TheWorldSantaClausCongressisdesignedforpeoplewhoenjo
[originaltext]TheWorldSantaClausCongressisdesignedforpeoplewhoenjo
It’sbeen30yearssinceCongressrevisedUSpatentlawstoencourageun
It’sbeen30yearssinceCongressrevisedUSpatentlawstoencourageun
It’sbeen30yearssinceCongressrevisedUSpatentlawstoencourageun
随机试题
他们用很多因素来评估一个国家,如工作满意度、经济发展、国民健康、财富和教育水平,以及气候、战争、政局稳定性等。(rangefrom…)Theyjudgea
Psychologistshavebeenstudyingthechangespeopleexperiencewhentheyleaver
Overtheyears,I’veheardafairnumberofslursshoutedatcampuscops.S
Whenyoungpeoplegettheirfirstrealjobs,theyfacealotofnew,confusi
综合理财规划服务涵盖了客户理财目标的所有方面,其内容包括( )。A.现金收支管
男,72岁,哮喘史40年,近5年来发生双下肢水肿,1周来哮喘加重
图示机构中各杆的自重不计,BC杆水平,α=30°,在C点悬挂重物的重力大小W=1
期货公司及其从业人员从事期货投资咨询业务时,禁止的行为包括()。A.向客户做获
A.26.7 B.44.4 C.50 D.133.3
Courvoisier征阳性的疾病最可能是A、胆管上段癌 B、胆管下段癌 C
最新回复
(
0
)