首页
登录
职称英语
Whose Grave is This Anyway?There are many legends about the
Whose Grave is This Anyway?There are many legends about the
游客
2024-01-03
7
管理
问题
Whose Grave is This Anyway?
There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for thousands of years along the Nero River. In reality though, this silence has constantly been disturbed by a great variety of people. While considering their different motivations in doing so, we must examine whether disturbing the ancient tombs is justifiable or worthy of condemnation.
(A)
hen Howard Carter and his party opened the tomb of the Egyptian king Tutankhamen in 1922, there was rejoicing around the world.(B)
he tomb was largely intact and not seriously pillaged by ancient grave robbers, so it still contained the wonderful artifacts that had been buried with the young king more than three millennia earlier.(C)
Over the next several years Carter and his team systematically photographed and catalogued the objects from the tomb, then transported them to the Cairo Museum.(D)
There is a certain irony in this story that raises complex ethical questions. Why are Carter and his
party
not called grave robbers? Why are their actions in stripping the tomb acceptable—even praiseworthy—when similar behavior by common thieves would be deplored? No matter who opens a tomb and takes away its contents, that person is violating the intentions of
those
who sealed the tomb originally. No matter what the motivation, a human body that was meant to rest in peace for all time has been disturbed. Should this not make us feel uncomfortable?
From the beginning, some were uneasy about the propriety of unearthing Tutankhamen’s remains. When Lord Carnarvon, Carter’s sponsor, died suddenly from a mosquito bite, and several others connected with the project experienced tragedies, rumors arose about the "curse of King Tut". But Carter himself died peacefully many years later, and the talk subsided.
Perhaps it is the passage of time that transforms grave robbing into archaeology.
Carter would no doubt have been outraged if, say, his grandmother’s coffin had been dug up to strip the body of its jewelry. But after three thousand years Tutankhamen has no living relatives to protest his disturbance.
Perhaps it is a question of the words we use to describe such ancient finds. We speak of Tutankhamen’s "mummy", and mummy is a clean, historical-sounding word. Parents bring their children to museums to see the mummies and mummy cases. We can almost forget that a mummy is the embalmed body of a dead human being, pulled out of its coffin so that we can marvel at the coffin and sometimes the body itself.
Or, perhaps the difference between grave robbing and archaeology lies in the motives of the perpetrators. Common thieves are motivated by greed, by their quest for money to be made by selling stolen objects. Carter and his team did not sell the treasures from Tutankhamen’s tomb but stored them safely in the Cairo Museum, where art lovers from around the world can see them.
They
were, in effect, making a glorious gift to the people of our century and centuries to come(while at the same time, one must point out, acquiring significant glory for themselves).
The basic issue is a
clash
of cultural values. To the Egyptians, it was normal and correct to bury their finest artworks with the exalted dead. To us, the idea of all that beauty being locked away in the dark forever seems an appalling waste. We want to bring it into the light, to have it as part of our precious artistic
heritage
. Almost no one, having seen these magnificent treasures, would seriously propose they be put back in the tomb and sealed up.
In the end, inevitably, our cultural values will prevail simply because we are still here and the ancient Egyptians are not. After three thousand years, Tutankhamen’s grave really isn’t his anymore. Whether right or wrong, it belongs to us. [br] According to the passage, what is the essential difference between grave robbing and archaeology?
选项
A、Archaeologists are permitted to obtain the treasures of ancient tombs while grave robbers are not.
B、Grave robbers are allowed to discover the mysteries of ancient tombs while archaeologists are not.
C、Grave robbers’ motivations are monetary whereas archaeologists are interested in uncovering ancient cultures.
D、Archaeologists open an ancient tomb to sell stolen objects while grave robbers do so for money.
答案
C
解析
本题为事实信息题。题目问:盗墓和考古的主要区别是什么?根据第七段,“Or,perhaps the difference between grave robbing and archaeology lies in the motives of theperpetrators”,即“盗墓和考古的最大区别就在于两者的动机不同”,盗墓是为了钱而考古是为了将人类的文明展示给公众,所以选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3330422.html
相关试题推荐
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveisThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveisThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
随机试题
Thoreausaideducationoftenmadestraight-cutditchesoutoftwistingsmall
Iwishtogohomewithyou,?A、mayIB、shallIC、wouldID、canIA此处反意问句应用表示“能不能
以下关于质性研究与定量研究的区别,说法正确的有()A.质性研究是研究者参与到自然
老张身为单位会计人员十几年间,工作刻苦,努力钻研业务,积极学习并为单位提供合理化
关于遗传性乳光牙本质,下列哪一项是正确的() A.发育障碍主要位于
流脑患儿的皮疹特点是( )A.斑丘疹 B.斑疹 C.荨麻疹 D.丘疹 E
金融债券的招投标发行通过()债券发行系统进行。A、中国人民银行 B、中国债券
麻醉药品和第一类精神药品要求只是专人押运的运输形式为A.道路运输 B.水路运输
银行承兑汇票的承兑银行,应当按照票面金额向出票人收取()的手续费。A:千分之一
下列具有吸声、绝热性能的人造木材有()。A.胶合板 B.硬质纤维板 C.软
最新回复
(
0
)