首页
登录
职称英语
Whose Grave Is This Anyway? There are many legends about the
Whose Grave Is This Anyway? There are many legends about the
游客
2024-01-04
29
管理
问题
Whose Grave Is This Anyway?
There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for thousands of years along the Nero River. In reality though, this silence has constantly been disturbed by a great variety of people. While considering their different motivations in doing so, we must examine whether disturbing the ancient tombs is justifiable or worthy of condemnation.
(A) [■] When Howard Carter and his party opened the tomb of the Egyptian king Tutankhamen in 1922, there was rejoicing around the world.
(B) [■] The tomb was largely intact and not seriously pillaged by ancient grave robbers, so it still contained the wonderful artifacts that had been buried with the young king more than three millennia earlier.
(C) [■] Over the next several years Carter and his team systematically photographed and catalogued the objects from the tomb, then transported them to the Cairo Museum.
(D) [■] There is a certain irony in this story that raises complex ethical questions. Why are Carter and his
party
not called grave robbers? Why are their actions in stripping the tomb acceptable—even praiseworthy—when similar behavior by common thieves would be deplored? No matter who opens a tomb and takes away its contents, that person is violating the intentions of
those
who sealed the tomb originally. No matter what the motivation, a human body that was meant to rest in peace for all time has been disturbed. Should this not make us feel uncomfortable? From the beginning, some were uneasy about the propriety of unearthing Tutankhamen’s remains. When Lord Carnarvon, Carter’s sponsor, died suddenly from a mosquito bite, and several others connected with the project experienced tragedies, rumors arose about the "curse of King Tut". But Carter himself died peacefully many years later, and the talk subsided.
Perhaps it is the passage of time that transforms grave robbing into archaeology.
Carter would no doubt have been outraged if, say, his grandmother’s coffin had been dug up to strip the body of its jewelry. But after three thousand years Tutankhamen has no living relatives to protest his disturbance. Perhaps it is a question of the words we use to describe such ancient finds. We speak of Tutankhamen’s "mummy", and mummy is a clean, historical-sounding word. Parents bring their children to museums to see the mummies and mummy cases. We can almost forget that a mummy is the embalmed body of a dead human being, pulled out of its coffin so that we can marvel at the coffin and sometimes the body itself. Or, perhaps the difference between grave robbing and archaeology lies in the motives of the perpetrators. Common thieves are motivated by greed, by their quest for money to be made by selling stolen objects. Carter and his team did not sell the treasures from Tutankhamen’s tomb but stored them safely in the Cairo Museum, where art lovers from around the world can see them.
They
were, in effect, making a glorious gift to the people of our century and centuries to come (while at the same time, one must point out, acquiring significant glory for themselves). The basic issue is a
clash
of cultural values. To the Egyptians, it was normal and correct to bury their finest artworks with the exalted dead. To us, the idea of all that beauty being locked away in the dark forever seems an appalling waste. We want to bring it into the light, to have it as part of our precious artistic
heritage
. Almost no one, having seen these magnificent treasures, would seriously propose they be put back in the tomb and sealed up. In the end, inevitably, our cultural values will prevail simply because we are still here and the ancient Egyptians are not. After three thousand years, Tutankhamen’s grave really isn’t his anymore. Whether right or wrong, it belongs to us. [br] According to Paragraph 7, what is the contribution of Carter and his party?
选项
A、They brought into light valuable treasures for ordinary people to enjoy.
B、They stored the valuable treasures in the Cairo Museum.
C、They sold the valuable treasures to art lovers.
D、They put back the valuable treasures in the tomb.
答案
A
解析
本题仍为事实信息题。题目问:根据第七段,Carter和他的队友所作出的贡献是什么?根据第七段的最后一句话“They were, in effect, making a glorious gift to the people of our century and centuries to come(他们实际上为这个世纪以及未来世纪的人们奉献了丰厚的礼物)”。倒数第二句也说“Carter and his team…stored them safely in the Cairo Museum, where art lovers from around the world can see them”,即“他们将这些财宝安全地存入开罗博物馆,以便世界各地的艺术爱好者能够来欣赏”,正确答案是A(他们将宝贵的财富展示给了世人)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3334058.html
相关试题推荐
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveisThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveisThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveisThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
随机试题
[originaltext]Wecanagreewithprimitivemanthatfoodisabasicneed,bu
[originaltext]MymotherwasborninasmalltowninnorthernItaly.(1)Shew
习近平在2016年11月召开的文代会上提出:改革开放近40年来,我们党领导人民所
甲公司2008年度财务报告批准报出日为2009年3月30日,实际对外公布日期为2
施工单位与建设单位签订施工合同,双方没有约定付款时间,后因利息计算产生争议,则下
房地产经纪人执业资格考试通过的标准是,参加全部4个科目考试的人员必须在( )内
在喹喏酮类抗菌药的构效关系中,这类物的必要基团是A:1位氮原子无取代 B:5位
难溶于水而易溶于氯仿的成分是A:双糖 B:蛋白质 C:无机盐 D:游离生物
某客户通过期货公司开仓卖出1月份黄大豆1号期货合约100手(10吨/手),成交价
无明显肾毒性的药物是A.青霉素 B.环孢素 C.头孢噻吩 D.庆大霉素
最新回复
(
0
)