首页
登录
职称英语
Whose Grave Is This Anyway? There are many legends about the
Whose Grave Is This Anyway? There are many legends about the
游客
2024-01-04
55
管理
问题
Whose Grave Is This Anyway?
There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for thousands of years along the Nero River. In reality though, this silence has constantly been disturbed by a great variety of people. While considering their different motivations in doing so, we must examine whether disturbing the ancient tombs is justifiable or worthy of condemnation.
(A) [■] When Howard Carter and his party opened the tomb of the Egyptian king Tutankhamen in 1922, there was rejoicing around the world.
(B) [■] The tomb was largely intact and not seriously pillaged by ancient grave robbers, so it still contained the wonderful artifacts that had been buried with the young king more than three millennia earlier.
(C) [■] Over the next several years Carter and his team systematically photographed and catalogued the objects from the tomb, then transported them to the Cairo Museum.
(D) [■] There is a certain irony in this story that raises complex ethical questions. Why are Carter and his
party
not called grave robbers? Why are their actions in stripping the tomb acceptable—even praiseworthy—when similar behavior by common thieves would be deplored? No matter who opens a tomb and takes away its contents, that person is violating the intentions of
those
who sealed the tomb originally. No matter what the motivation, a human body that was meant to rest in peace for all time has been disturbed. Should this not make us feel uncomfortable? From the beginning, some were uneasy about the propriety of unearthing Tutankhamen’s remains. When Lord Carnarvon, Carter’s sponsor, died suddenly from a mosquito bite, and several others connected with the project experienced tragedies, rumors arose about the "curse of King Tut". But Carter himself died peacefully many years later, and the talk subsided.
Perhaps it is the passage of time that transforms grave robbing into archaeology.
Carter would no doubt have been outraged if, say, his grandmother’s coffin had been dug up to strip the body of its jewelry. But after three thousand years Tutankhamen has no living relatives to protest his disturbance. Perhaps it is a question of the words we use to describe such ancient finds. We speak of Tutankhamen’s "mummy", and mummy is a clean, historical-sounding word. Parents bring their children to museums to see the mummies and mummy cases. We can almost forget that a mummy is the embalmed body of a dead human being, pulled out of its coffin so that we can marvel at the coffin and sometimes the body itself. Or, perhaps the difference between grave robbing and archaeology lies in the motives of the perpetrators. Common thieves are motivated by greed, by their quest for money to be made by selling stolen objects. Carter and his team did not sell the treasures from Tutankhamen’s tomb but stored them safely in the Cairo Museum, where art lovers from around the world can see them.
They
were, in effect, making a glorious gift to the people of our century and centuries to come (while at the same time, one must point out, acquiring significant glory for themselves). The basic issue is a
clash
of cultural values. To the Egyptians, it was normal and correct to bury their finest artworks with the exalted dead. To us, the idea of all that beauty being locked away in the dark forever seems an appalling waste. We want to bring it into the light, to have it as part of our precious artistic
heritage
. Almost no one, having seen these magnificent treasures, would seriously propose they be put back in the tomb and sealed up. In the end, inevitably, our cultural values will prevail simply because we are still here and the ancient Egyptians are not. After three thousand years, Tutankhamen’s grave really isn’t his anymore. Whether right or wrong, it belongs to us. [br] According to Paragraph 8, which of the following is true of ancient Egyptians?
选项
A、It was normal to store beautiful artwork in the tomb with their dead relatives.
B、They would like to have all the valuables in the tomb to be exhibited in public.
C、They intended to preserve their ancient culture in the tomb.
D、They regard all the artwork in the tomb as part of a precious artistic heritage for all human beings to enjoy.
答案
A
解析
本题为正误判断题,考查的是考生根据文章中阐明的信息,判断什么信息是正确的,什么信息是错误的,什么信息是文章中没有提到的。题目问:根据第七段,关于古埃及人,下列哪一项是正确的?根据该段的第二句话“To the Egyptians, it was normal and correct to bury their finest artworks with the exalted dead(古埃及人认为将他们最精美的艺术品和他们高贵的逝者葬在一起是再正常不过的事了)”可以断定A项为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3334061.html
相关试题推荐
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveIsThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveisThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
WhoseGraveisThisAnyway?Therearemanylegendsaboutthe
随机试题
Whatdidthequestionerwanttoknow?Hewantedtoknowsomethingabout______.
[originaltext]W:Hey,George.You’refromBoston,right?M:Yeah,I’mfromNewt
[originaltext]W:Goodmorning,CanIhelpyou?M:Yes,I’dliketogetsomeins
Beingassertive(过分自信)isbeingabletocommunicatewithotherpeopleclearly.
根据《招标投标法》的规定,下列关于联合体投标的变更表述中不正确的是()。A、联
发行公司无权选择股票发行的发行方式,由承销商根据实际情况具体确定。()
次级类贷款的特征是:借款人的还款能力出现明显问题,完全依靠其正常营业收入无法足额
(2021年真题)甲公司为增值税一般纳税人,2019年购置并实际使用《环境保护
某施工单位承接了某二级公路预应力混凝土连续梁跨河大桥,桥跨布置为4联,每联3跨,
关于法的效力层级的说法,正确的是( )。A.部门规章与地方法规之间对同一事项的
最新回复
(
0
)