首页
登录
职称英语
CROWN-OF-THORNS STARFISH AND CORAL REEFS
CROWN-OF-THORNS STARFISH AND CORAL REEFS
游客
2024-01-02
31
管理
问题
CROWN-OF-THORNS STARFISH AND CORAL REEFS
(1) The crown-of-thorns starfish, Acanthaster planet, is large, 25 to 35 centimeters in diameter, and has 7 to 21 arms that are covered in spines. It feeds primarily on coral and is found from the Indian Ocean to the west coast of Central America, usually at quite low population densities. Since the mid-1950s, population outbreaks at densities four to six times greater than normal have occurred at the same time in places such as Hawaii, Tahiti, Panama, and the Great Barrier Reef. The result has often been the loss of a 50% to nearly 100% of the coral cover over large areas.
(2) [A] A single Acanthaster can consume 5 to 6 square meters of coral polyps per year, and dense populations can destroy up to 6 square kilometers per year. [B] Acanthasters show a preference for branching corals, especially Acroporids. [C] After an outbreak in a particular area, it is common to find that Acroporids have been selectively removed, leaving a mosaic of living and dead corals. [D] In places where Acroporids previously dominated the community devastation can be almost complete, and local areas of reefs have collapsed.
(3) Areas of dead coral are usually colonized rapidly by algae and often are later colonized by sponges and soft corals. Increases in abundance of plant-eating fish and decreases in abundance of coral-feeding fish
accompany
these changes. Coral larvae settle among the algae and eventually establish flourishing coral colonies. In 10 to 15 years the reefs often return to about the same percentage of coral cover as before. Development of a four-species diversity takes about 20 years.
(4) Two schools of thought exist concerning the cause of these outbreaks. One group holds that they are natural phenomena that have occurred many times in the past, citing old men’s recollections of earlier outbreaks and evidence from traditional cultures. The other group maintains that recent human activities ranging from physical coral destruction through pollution to predator removal have triggered these events.
(5) One theory, the adult aggregation hypothesis, maintains that most species are more abundant than we realize when a storm destroys coral and causes a food shortage. The adult Acanthasters converge on remaining portions of healthy coral and feed hungrily. Certainly there have been outbreaks of Acanthasters following large storms, but there is little evidence that the storms have caused the enough reef damage to create a food shortage for these starfish.
(6) Two other hypotheses attempt to explain the increased abundance of Acanthasters after episodes of high terrestrial runoff following storms. The first hypothesis is that low salinity and high temperatures favor the survival of the starfish larvae. The second hypothesis emphasizes the food web aspect, suggesting that strong fresh water runoff brings additional nutrients to the coastal waters, stimulating phytoplankton production and promoting more rapid development and better survival of the starfish larvae.
(7) Those favoring anthropogenic (human influenced) causes have pointed to the large proportion of outbreaks that have been near centers of human populations. It has been suggested that coral polyps are the main predators of the starfish larvae.
Destruction of coral by blasting and other bad land use practices would reduce predation on the starfish larvae and cause a feedback in which increases in Acanthaster populations cause still further coral destruction.
Unfortunately, there are too few documented instances of physical destruction of coral being followed by outbreaks of Acanthasters for these hypotheses to be fully supported.
(8) Another group of hypothesis focuses on removal of Acanthaster predators. Some have suggested that the predators might have been killed off by pollution whereas others have suggested that the harvesting of vertebrate and invertebrate predators of Acanthasters could have reduced mortality and caused increased abundance of adults. The problem with this group of hypothesis is that it is difficult to understand how reduced predation would lead to sudden increases in Acanthaster numbers in several places at the same time in specific years. It seems probable that there is no single explanation but that there are elements of the truth in several of the hypotheses. That is there are natural processes that have led to outbreaks in the past, but human impact has increased the frequency and severity of the outbreaks. [br] Look at the four squares [ ■ ] that indicate where the following sentence can be added to the passage. The crown-of-thorns starfish is a coral reef predator that preys on coral polyps.
Where would the sentence best fit?
选项
答案
A
解析
本题为句子插入题,需要插入的句子意为“棘冠海星是一种以珊瑚虫为食的珊瑚礁捕食者”。原文第2段第1句“一只棘冠海星每年可消耗5—6平方米的珊瑚虫”,细节性地说明棘冠海星可以吃掉很多珊瑚虫,而插入句又恰恰概括性地指明了棘冠海星以珊瑚虫为食,说明这两句话存在前后文逻辑联系,故题干句子应放在原文第1句之前,第2段第2—4句都是在介绍棘冠海星对鹿角珊瑚的偏好,内容逻辑非常连贯,不宜插入题干句子,故选A处。B、C、D三处说的都是棘冠海星对鹿角珊瑚的偏好,语义连贯。均不宜插入句子。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3327410.html
相关试题推荐
CROWN-OF-THORNSSTARFISHANDCORALREEFS
CROWN-OF-THORNSSTARFISHANDCORALREEFS
CROWN-OF-THORNSSTARFISHANDCORALREEFS
CROWN-OF-THORNSSTARFISHANDCORALREEFS
CROWN-OF-THORNSSTARFISHANDCORALREEFS
CROWN-OF-THORNSSTARFISHANDCORALREEFS
CROWN-OF-THORNSSTARFISHANDCORALREEFS
CROWN-OF-THORNSSTARFISHANDCORALREEFS
CROWN-OF-THORNSSTARFISHANDCORALREEFS
CROWN-OF-THORNSSTARFISHANDCORALREEFS
随机试题
ResearchofVitaminAhasbeenconductedonhumanbodiessince1912.[originalte
商品的价值量不是由各个商品生产者所耗费的个别劳动时间决定的,而是由()决定的。
下列关于城市维护建设税的表述中,错误的是( )。A、个体商贩及个人在集市上出售商
下列不是生地黄功效的是A、清热 B、凉血 C、养阴 D、生津 E、解毒
引起弥散性血管内凝血最常见的疾病是A.败血症B.胎盘早剥C.大面积烧伤D.恶性肿
肾脏损伤患者进行非手术治疗后,下列护理措施不正确的是()。A.严密监测生命体征
女孩6岁。右下后牙吃饭时疼痛一周。检查:龋洞较深,腐质黄褐色,不松动,叩痛(-)
下列属于非合同利益相关者的是()。A.客户 B.员工 C.供应商 D
诊断库欣综合征(Cushing综合征)最有意义的检查是A.地塞米松抑制试验 B
“制造费用”账户属于费用类账户,用以核算企业生产车间(部门)为生产产品和提供劳务
最新回复
(
0
)