2. 职称英语
  3. At a chess tournament in Tunisia in 1967, Bobby Fischer, then 24, was pitted

At a chess tournament in Tunisia in 1967, Bobby Fischer, then 24, was pitted

游客2023-12-15  27
问题     At a chess tournament in Tunisia in 1967, Bobby Fischer, then 24, was pitted against another American grand master, Samuel Reshevsky. At game time, Fischer was nowhere to be found, so Reshevsky sat down opposite Fischer’s empty chair, made his first move, punched the game clock and waited. And waited. With five minutes left, Fischer suddenly strode onstage and, with a series of blindingly quick moves, hammered Reshevsky into defeat. Two days later, Fischer quit the tournament and abandoned competitive chess for two years. Which raises the question, Why is the gift of genius so often given to people too stupid to know what to do with it?
    In "Bobby Fischer Goes to War" (Ecco; 342 pages), David Edmonds and John Eidinow tell the story of Fischer’s most famous match, the 1972 world championship in Reykjavik. Fischer faced Soviet grand master Boris Spassky in a chess game that was not only an epic staring match between two intellectual gladiators but also the focus of all kinds of weird, free-floating cold war cultural-political energy. It was the Rumble in the Jungle and the Cuban missile crisis all rolled into one.
    The drama was hopelessly miscast. Fischer, the champion of the American way, was an antisocial, anti-Semitic ego-maniac who complained about the lighting, the auditorium, the prize money, even the marble the chessboard was made of. Spassky, the cog in the Soviet machine, was a genial, sensitive fellow who liked a drink once in a while. He was Ali to Fischer’s Foreman. Of course, Fischer ate him alive. "Bobby Fischer Goes to War" tells the story in fine, brisk style, interpreting the red-hot chess-fu action—the Ruy Lopez opening! The Nimzo-Indian defense!—for us nongeniuses and conveying the richness of the world beyond the chessboard through details plucked from FBI and KGB records. We see, for example, Soviet experts whisking Spassky’s orange juice back to Moscow to test for suspicious capitalist contaminants.
    It seems to be in the nature of genius to zero in on its purpose. In the 1790s a young French boy named Jean-Francois Champollion, the son of a bookseller, became obsessed with ancient languages—not only Latin and Greek hut also Hebrew, Arabic, Persian and Chaldean. According to "The Linguist and the Emperor" (Ballantine; 271 pages), by Daniel Meyerson, Champollion was a dreamy, solitary kid who mouthed oft in class, but as a schoolboy, he assembled a 2,000-page dictionary of Coptic, an ancient Egyptian language. Luckily for him, French soldiers in Egypt soon discovered the Rosetta stone, a chunk of gray and pink rock with the same text written on it in both Greek and Egyptian hieroglyphics, which no one had yet deciphered. Unlocking hieroglyphics was Champollion’s great work, and Meyerson tells the story as a passionate linguistic love affair. After finally solving the mystery, Champollion collapsed in a coma for eight days.
    Champollion and Fischer were lucky: they were heroes in their time. Deprived of the spotlight, genius can grow up twisted and strange. David Hahn was the child of divorced, clueless parents living in a David Lynch—perfect Michigan suburb in the mid-1990s. A loner and a compulsive tinkerer, Hahn somehow got it into his head in high school to build a nuclear reactor in his mom’s potting shed, and damn if he didn’t come close. In "The Radioactive Boy Scout" (Random House; 209 pages), Ken Silverstein describes how Hahn extracted radioactive elements from household objects—americium from smoke detectors, thorium from Coleman lanterns, deadly radium from the glow-in-the-dark paint used on the hands of vintage clocks. For sheer improvisational ingenuity, Hahn makes MacGyver look like Jessica Simpson. When public-health officials finally caught on to what Hahn was up to, the potting shed was so hot that it had to be classified as a Superfund site.
    Stories about geniuses rarely end well. Hahn wound up in the Navy, assigned to the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier the U.S. Enterprise, but his officers wouldn’t even let him tour the engine room. Champollion died at 40. Fischer never defended his world title. He declined into irascibility and then obscurity. What happened to him? A chess master once said, "Chess is not something that drives people mad. Chess is something that keeps mad people sane." Which is to say that genius may lie not only in having a gift but in lacking something crucial as well. Reading these books, one feels grateful for being just a little stupid. [br] According to the passage, which of the following about the 1972 match is NOT true?
选项 A、Fischer defeated Spassky.
B、It was a match between two cleverest men.
C、It was an embodiment of strength of the two coutries.
D、Fischer lost the match hopelessly.
答案 D
解析 由第二段和第三段可知，1972年那场比赛是在两个“intellectual gladiators”之间进行的，是美国和前苏联力量的较量，最后，当然是Fischer赢得了那场比赛。因此，选项D与原文不符，为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3275070.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)