首页
登录
职称英语
Despite the brouhaha (骚动) over stolen e-mails from the University of East An
Despite the brouhaha (骚动) over stolen e-mails from the University of East An
游客
2023-07-19
24
管理
问题
Despite the brouhaha (骚动) over stolen e-mails from the University of East Anglia, the science of climate change is well enough established by now that we can move on to the essential question: what’s the damage going to be?
The total bill, if emissions are left unchecked, could reach 20 percent of annual per capita income, says Nicholas Stern, the British economist who led an influential Whitehall-sponsored study. William Nordhaus, a Yale economist, puts his "best guess" at 2.5 percent of yearly global GDP. And according to Dutch economist Richard Tol, the economic impact of a century’s worth of climate change is "relatively small" and "comparable to the impact of one or two years of economic growth".
These estimates aren’t just different—they’re different by an order of magnitude. And while some might dismiss the cost estimates as mere intellectual exercises, they’re intellectual exercises with real impact. The Copenhagen meeting may be a bust, but countries from the United States to China are individually considering cap-and-trade schemes, carbon taxes, and other policies aimed at curtailing greenhouse gases. To be effective, a tax or cap-and-trade charge would have to force today’s emitters to pay the true "social cost of carbon"—in other words, the amount of damage an extra ton of carbon will cause in the coming centuries.
Figuring out what that cost is, however, is no simple task. That’s largely because most of the bill won’t come due for many decades. A ton of carbon dioxide emitted today will linger in the air for anywhere from one to five centuries. Virtually every cost study shows that, even if economic growth continues apace (快速 地) and there’s no effort to slash emissions, the damage from climate change will be negligible until at least 2075. It could take 100 years before we see noticeably negative effects, and even more before we need to launch massive construction projects to mitigate (减轻) the damage. [br] What can we learn about the present climate change?
选项
A、The damage is somewhat exaggerated.
B、Actions will be taken the moment people realize it.
C、Measures should be taken immediately to tackle it.
D、The negative effects will not be significant for a century.
答案
D
解析
综合推断题。根据定位句可知,气候变化带来的影响至少要到2075年才会显现,而显著的负面影响在一百年之后才能够看到,更多年后我们才会发起大规模建设项目来减轻这种损欠。故D)“一个世纪中,负面影响都不会很明显”为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2852044.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]W:Whatdoyouplantodoafteryoufinishyouruniversitywork?
[originaltext]W:Whatdoyouplantodoafteryoufinishyouruniversitywork?
Despitetheroadimprovementsoftheturnpikeera(1790—1830),Americanscont
Despitetheroadimprovementsoftheturnpikeera(1790—1830),Americanscont
Despitetheroadimprovementsoftheturnpikeera(1790—1830),Americanscont
Despitetheroadimprovementsoftheturnpikeera(1790—1830),Americanscont
[originaltext]M:IwonderiftheUniversityhaschosenthenewpresidentyet?W
[originaltext]StudentswhowanttoattendanAmericancollegeoruniversity
ApaperpublishedbytworesearchersattheUniversityofLondonclaimstop
ApaperpublishedbytworesearchersattheUniversityofLondonclaimstop
随机试题
Recently,somelocalgovernmentshaveadvocatedthatuniversityshouldteach
Thefollowingdeterminers(限定词)canbeusedwithbothpluralanduncountablenouns
Languagelearningbeginswithlistening.Individualchildrenvarygreatlyi
工料单价法的分部分项工程量的单价中,不含(),它们按照有关规定需另行计算。A.
正常骨髓象A.增生极度减低B.增生减低C.增生活跃D.增生明显活跃E.增生极度活
妊娠期母体体重增加的规律,下列错误的是A.妊娠早期增加不明显 B.妊娠晚期每周
某容器中含氨0.32mol、氧0.18mol、氮0.70mol,总压强为10
在制定风险偏好过程中需要考虑的因素,不包括()。A.风险偏好与利益相关人的期望
依据机体生物钟规律,补充钙制剂的适宜时间是()A.餐中给药 B.清晨顿服
根据《房屋建筑与装饰工程工程量计算规范》(GB50854-2013),螺栓、铁
最新回复
(
0
)