首页
登录
职称英语
There are plenty of studies which show that dogs act as social catalysts (催化
There are plenty of studies which show that dogs act as social catalysts (催化
游客
2023-07-19
44
管理
问题
There are plenty of studies which show that dogs act as social catalysts (催化剂), helping their owners forge intimate, long-term relationships with other people. But does that apply in the workplace? Christopher Honts and his colleagues at Central Michigan University were surprised to find that there was not much research on this question, and decided to put that right. They wondered in particular if the mere presence of a dog in the office might make people collaborate more effectively. And, they found that it could.
To reach this conclusion, they carried out two experiments. In the first, they brought together 12 groups of four individuals and told each group to come up with a 15-second advertisement for a made-up product. Everyone was asked to contribute ideas for the ad, but ultimately the group had to decide on only one. Some of the groups had a dog underfoot throughout, while the others had none. After the task, all the volunteers had to answer a questionnaire on how they felt about working with the other human members of the team. Mr. Honts found that those who had had a dog ranked their teammates more highly on measures of trust, team cohesion and intimacy than those who had not.
In the other experiment, the researchers explored how the presence of an animal altered players’ behaviour in a game known as the prisoner’s dilemma. In this game played by the volunteers, all four members of each group had been "charged" with a crime. Individually, they could choose (without being able to talk to the others) either to snitch (告发) on their teammates or to stand by them. Each individual’s decision affected the outcomes for the other three as well as for himself in a way that was explained in advance. The lightest sentence would be given to someone who chose to snitch while the other three did not; the heaviest penalty would be borne by a lone non-snitch. The second-best outcome came when all four decided not to snitch. And so on. Having a dog around made volunteers 30% less likely to snitch than those who played without one. The moral, then: more dogs in offices and fewer in police stations. [br] What can we conclude from the last sentence?
选项
A、We should have many dogs in the offices.
B、Dogs should not appear in police stations.
C、The experiments about dogs teach us a lesson.
D、The presence of dogs is helpful in offices.
答案
D
解析
推理判断题。定位句指出,由此我们得出一个真理:在办公场所多养小狗,在警察局则要少养。由此可推知D)“在办公场所,小狗的出现是有帮助的”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2851290.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]Rememberingnamesisanimportantsocialskill.Herearesome
[originaltext]Rememberingnamesisanimportantsocialskill.Herearesome
Thisholidayseason,thereareplentyofadsthatplayupthesameoldnarra
Thisholidayseason,thereareplentyofadsthatplayupthesameoldnarra
Thisholidayseason,thereareplentyofadsthatplayupthesameoldnarra
Thisholidayseason,thereareplentyofadsthatplayupthesameoldnarra
[originaltext]Sciencecan’texplainthepowerofpets,butmanystudieshav
[originaltext]Sciencecan’texplainthepowerofpets,butmanystudieshav
Socialchangeismorelikelytooccurinsocietieswherethereisa【B1】_____
Socialchangeismorelikelytooccurinsocietieswherethereisa【B1】_____
随机试题
TheBasisforSocialOrderMan,saidAristotle,isa
[originaltext]Astudentreporterwithacellphonerecordedscenesofpolice
Thefollowingparagraphsaregivenina
从大动脉至毛细血管的口径逐渐变小,所以血压也越来越高。
A.铜 B.钴 C.钾 D.硒 E.铬参与造血的是
Ante提出应该()A.以基牙形态决定基牙数目 B.以力比值决定基
断路器投运前,应检查()是否全部拆除(拉开),防误闭锁装置是否正常(A)接地线(
整体价值是公司预测时期末的市场价值。()
原始凭证不得涂改、刮擦、挖补,原始凭证金额有错误的,应当由出具单位更正,并在更正
在应用因果分析图确定质量问题的原因时,正确的做法是()。A.不同类型质量问题可
最新回复
(
0
)