首页
登录
职称英语
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really
游客
2023-06-23
19
管理
问题
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really good science, it is impossible to predict. If the things to be found are actually new, they are by definition unknown in advance. You cannot make choices in this matter. You either have science or you don’t, and if you have it you are obliged to accept the surprising and disturbing pieces of information, along with the neat and promptly useful bits.
The only solid piece of scientific truth about which I feel totally confident is that we are profoundly ignorant about nature. Indeed, I regard this as the major discovery of the past hundred years of biology. It is, in its way, an illuminating piece of news. It would have amazed the brightest minds of the 18th century Enlightenment(启蒙运动)to be told by any of us how little we know and how bewildering(迷惑)seems the way ahead.
It is this sudden confrontation(对抗)with the depth and scope of ignorance that represents the most significant contribution of the 20th century science to the human intellect. In earlier times, we either pretended to understand how things worked or ignored the problem, or simply made up stories to fill the gaps. Now that we have begun exploring in earnest, we are getting glimpses of how huge the questions are, and how far from being answered. Because of this, we are depressed. It is not so bad being ignorant if you are totally ignorant; the hard thing is knowing in some detail the reality of ignorance, the worst spots and here and there the not-so-bad spots, but no true light at the end of the tunnel nor even any tunnels that can yet be trusted.
But we are making a beginning, and there ought to be some satisfaction. There are probably no questions we can think up that can’t be answered, sooner or later, including even the matter of consciousness. To be sure, there may well be questions we can’t think up, ever, and therefore limits to the reach of human intellect, but that is another matter. Within our limits, we should be able to work our way through to all our answers, if we keep at it long enough, and pay attention. [br] According to the passage, which one about scientists in earlier times is Not true?
选项
A、They invented stories to explain things they didn’ t understand.
B、They falsely claimed to know how things worked.
C、They did not believe in results from scientific observation.
D、They paid little attention to the problems they didn’t understand.
答案
C
解析
推断题。关于早期科学家的说法在文中的第三段,A、B、D三个选项是对第三段科学家三种作为的转述,只有C不是早期科学家的作为,故选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2776471.html
相关试题推荐
Thequestionofwhetherourgovernmentshouldpromotescienceandtechnology
Thequestionofwhetherourgovernmentshouldpromotescienceandtechnology
Thequestionofwhetherourgovernmentshouldpromotescienceandtechnology
Thequestionofwhetherourgovernmentshouldpromotescienceandtechnology
[originaltext]Whatreallyworkstomakesustainablechangesindietandlif
[originaltext]W:Themarketisbecomingreallymoreandmorecompetitive.M:Ex
[originaltext]Whatreallyworkstomakesustainablechangesindietandlife
[originaltext]Whatreallyworkstomakesustainablechangesindietandlife
【B1】[br]【B19】A、concludesB、predictsC、reckonsD、prescribesB动词辨义题。根据此句中的时间状语th
【C1】[br]【C19】A、senseB、conscienceC、projectD、definitionA词语辨析题。此句译为:"应该有更多的钱用
随机试题
It’srareforaEuropeantobehonoredinthewaythatrockartexpertGeor
(1)Ayearago,mostpeoplewouldhavedrawnablankifaskedaboutZika.Si
患者,女性,47岁,近三个月来,腹部逐渐增大伴腹痛、腹胀入院;查体:腹部膨隆,腹
患者,女性,52岁,房屋坍塌致大腿挤压伤、急性肾衰竭。按原因分类其肾衰竭属于A.
按照标的资产分类,权证的分类不包括()。A、股权类权证 B、债权类权证 C
根据继电保护和安全自动装置缺陷通用归类原则,直流系统接地属于严重缺陷
承重墙梁,各部分尺寸见图及表,托梁混凝土强度等级为C20,纵向受力钢筋采用HRB
诊断原发性下肢深静脉瓣膜功能不全最可靠的检查方法是( )。A.Buerger试
按照葛兰碧的量价关系法则,在股价走势因成交量的递增而上升时,如果上升幅度较大,
矿业工程项目在进行施工现场准备时,关于需要完成的任务,说法不正确的是()。A
最新回复
(
0
)