首页
登录
职称英语
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really
游客
2023-06-23
22
管理
问题
It is hard to predict how science is going to turn out, and if it is really good science, it is impossible to predict. If the things to be found are actually new, they are by definition unknown in advance. You cannot make choices in this matter. You either have science or you don’t, and if you have it you are obliged to accept the surprising and disturbing pieces of information, along with the neat and promptly useful bits.
The only solid piece of scientific truth about which I feel totally confident is that we are profoundly ignorant about nature. Indeed, I regard this as the major discovery of the past hundred years of biology. It is, in its way, an illuminating piece of news. It would have amazed the brightest minds of the 18th century Enlightenment(启蒙运动)to be told by any of us how little we know and how bewildering(迷惑)seems the way ahead.
It is this sudden confrontation(对抗)with the depth and scope of ignorance that represents the most significant contribution of the 20th century science to the human intellect. In earlier times, we either pretended to understand how things worked or ignored the problem, or simply made up stories to fill the gaps. Now that we have begun exploring in earnest, we are getting glimpses of how huge the questions are, and how far from being answered. Because of this, we are depressed. It is not so bad being ignorant if you are totally ignorant; the hard thing is knowing in some detail the reality of ignorance, the worst spots and here and there the not-so-bad spots, but no true light at the end of the tunnel nor even any tunnels that can yet be trusted.
But we are making a beginning, and there ought to be some satisfaction. There are probably no questions we can think up that can’t be answered, sooner or later, including even the matter of consciousness. To be sure, there may well be questions we can’t think up, ever, and therefore limits to the reach of human intellect, but that is another matter. Within our limits, we should be able to work our way through to all our answers, if we keep at it long enough, and pay attention. [br] According to the passage, which one about scientists in earlier times is Not true?
选项
A、They invented stories to explain things they didn’ t understand.
B、They falsely claimed to know how things worked.
C、They did not believe in results from scientific observation.
D、They paid little attention to the problems they didn’t understand.
答案
C
解析
推断题。关于早期科学家的说法在文中的第三段,A、B、D三个选项是对第三段科学家三种作为的转述,只有C不是早期科学家的作为,故选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/2776471.html
相关试题推荐
Thequestionofwhetherourgovernmentshouldpromotescienceandtechnology
Thequestionofwhetherourgovernmentshouldpromotescienceandtechnology
Thequestionofwhetherourgovernmentshouldpromotescienceandtechnology
Thequestionofwhetherourgovernmentshouldpromotescienceandtechnology
[originaltext]Whatreallyworkstomakesustainablechangesindietandlif
[originaltext]W:Themarketisbecomingreallymoreandmorecompetitive.M:Ex
[originaltext]Whatreallyworkstomakesustainablechangesindietandlife
[originaltext]Whatreallyworkstomakesustainablechangesindietandlife
【B1】[br]【B19】A、concludesB、predictsC、reckonsD、prescribesB动词辨义题。根据此句中的时间状语th
【C1】[br]【C19】A、senseB、conscienceC、projectD、definitionA词语辨析题。此句译为:"应该有更多的钱用
随机试题
SuggestopediaⅠ.IntroductionA.
NeitherhenorI(be)______hisstudent.am本题测试的是主谓一致的用法。当neither...nor在句中作主语时,谓
Culturaldifferencesinbusinessentertainingincludeissuessuchaswhomon
公平执行()人证[br]法治()合法监禁E、Q
黄疸的基本病机是:A.肝络失和 B.湿邪壅阻中焦 C.气机阻滞,瘀血内结
指出下列不适当的组合()A.放射性碘摄取试验--甲状腺功能B.T抑制试验--甲
A.阻断边缘系统的多巴胺受体 B.阻断周围血管的α受体 C.阻断纹状体的多巴
A.AB.BC.CD.D
论述20世纪30年代欧美新传统教育思潮的主要观点及其影响。
与2004年年底相比,截至2007年12月,我国网民人数增长了()。 A
最新回复
(
0
)