首页
登录
职称英语
Jan Hendrik Schon’s success seemed too good to be true, and it was. In only
Jan Hendrik Schon’s success seemed too good to be true, and it was. In only
游客
2025-04-26
37
管理
问题
Jan Hendrik Schon’s success seemed too good to be true, and it was. In only four years as a physicist at Bell Laboratories, Schon, 32, had co-authored 90 scientific papers—one every 16 days—detailing new discoveries in superconductivity, lasers, nano-technology and quantum physics. This output astonished his colleagues, and made them suspicious. When one co-worker noticed that the same table of data appeared in two separate papers—which also happened to appear in the two most prestigious scientific journals in the world, Science and Nature—the jig was up. In October 2002, a Bell Labs investigation found that Schon had falsified and fabricated data. His career as a scientist was finished. Scientific scandals, which are as old as science itself, tend to follow similar patterns of presumption and due reward.
In recent years, of course, the pressure on scientists to publish in the top journals has increased, making the journals much more crucial to career success. The questions are whether Nature and Science have become too powerful as arbiters of what science reaches to the public, and whether the journals are up to their task as gatekeepers.
Each scientific specialty has its own set of journals. Physicists have Physical Review Letters, neuroscientists have Neuron, and so forth. Science and Nature, though, are the only two major journals that cover the gamut of scientific disciplines, from meteorology and zoology to quantum physics and chemistry. As a result, journalists look to them each week for the cream of the crop of new science papers. And scientists look to the journals in part to reach journalists. Why do they care? Competition for grants has gotten so fierce that scientists have sought popular renown to gain an edge over their rivals. Publication in specialized journals will win the acclaims from academics and satisfy the publish-or-perish imperative, but Science and Nature come with the added bonus of potentially getting your paper written up in the New York Times and other publications.
Scientists tend to pay more attention to the big two than to other journals. When more scientists know about a particular paper, they’re more apt to cite it in their own papers. Being oftcited will increase a scientist’s "Impact Factor", a measure of how often papers are cited by peers. Funding agencies use the "Impact Factor" as a rough measure of the influence of scientists they’re considering supporting. [br] The expression "the cream of the crop" in paragraph 3 most likely means "______".
选项
A、the most of all
B、the best of all
C、the recently released
D、the widely spread
答案
B
解析
词汇题。“The cream of the crop”的意思是“精华”,也就是B项“the best of all”。根据文章的意思,《自然》和《科学》是两本最好科学期刊,所以记者每个星期都会从中挑选最好的科学论文。据此也可以得出正确答案应为B项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4054710.html
相关试题推荐
Astrongsupportfromthelocalauthorityis______tothesuccessoftheprojec
JanHendrikSchon’ssuccessseemedtoogoodtobetrue,anditwas.Inonly
JanHendrikSchon’ssuccessseemedtoogoodtobetrue,anditwas.Inonly
JanHendrikSchon’ssuccessseemedtoogoodtobetrue,anditwas.Inonly
JanHendrikSchon’ssuccessseemedtoogoodtobetrue,anditwas.Inonly
Whatdotheextraordinarilysuccessfulcompanieshaveincommon?Tofindout
Whatdotheextraordinarilysuccessfulcompanieshaveincommon?Tofindout
Whatdotheextraordinarilysuccessfulcompanieshaveincommon?Tofindout
Whatdotheextraordinarilysuccessfulcompanieshaveincommon?Tofindout
Womenwhoapplyforjobsinmiddleorseniormanagementhaveahighersuccess
随机试题
Wheremostlikelydoesthewomanwork?[br][originaltext]W:Donati’sonMainS
Howmuchdobusticketsforadultscost?[br]WhereisBathAntiquesMarketloca
Thegeneralatlastgotachancetovisitthevillage______heusedtofight,_
在松散土体中开挖6m深的沟槽,支护方式应优先采用()。A.间断式水平挡土板横
淋巴注入乳糜池的淋巴干有()A.右颈淋巴干 B.右支气管纵隔干 C.
下列输血适应证中哪一项是错误的A.急性大出血时补充血容量 B.纠正贫血或低蛋白
案情: 甲女在小荒山上与身强体壮的搬运工人乙某相遇。乙某身揣屠刀一把,拟去正操
下列有关工伤保险的说法错误的是:() A.职工应当参加工伤保险,由职工和用
患者,女,实验室检查:血红蛋白95g/,临床诊断为缺铁性贫血,处方口服硫酸亚铁片
共用题干 某房地产企业为评估一项房地产开发投资,已支付30万元项目论证费,该评
最新回复
(
0
)