首页
登录
职称英语
Jan Hendrik Schon’s success seemed too good to be true, and it was. In only
Jan Hendrik Schon’s success seemed too good to be true, and it was. In only
游客
2025-04-26
26
管理
问题
Jan Hendrik Schon’s success seemed too good to be true, and it was. In only four years as a physicist at Bell Laboratories, Schon, 32, had co-authored 90 scientific papers—one every 16 days—detailing new discoveries in superconductivity, lasers, nano-technology and quantum physics. This output astonished his colleagues, and made them suspicious. When one co-worker noticed that the same table of data appeared in two separate papers—which also happened to appear in the two most prestigious scientific journals in the world, Science and Nature—the jig was up. In October 2002, a Bell Labs investigation found that Schon had falsified and fabricated data. His career as a scientist was finished. Scientific scandals, which are as old as science itself, tend to follow similar patterns of presumption and due reward.
In recent years, of course, the pressure on scientists to publish in the top journals has increased, making the journals much more crucial to career success. The questions are whether Nature and Science have become too powerful as arbiters of what science reaches to the public, and whether the journals are up to their task as gatekeepers.
Each scientific specialty has its own set of journals. Physicists have Physical Review Letters, neuroscientists have Neuron, and so forth. Science and Nature, though, are the only two major journals that cover the gamut of scientific disciplines, from meteorology and zoology to quantum physics and chemistry. As a result, journalists look to them each week for the cream of the crop of new science papers. And scientists look to the journals in part to reach journalists. Why do they care? Competition for grants has gotten so fierce that scientists have sought popular renown to gain an edge over their rivals. Publication in specialized journals will win the acclaims from academics and satisfy the publish-or-perish imperative, but Science and Nature come with the added bonus of potentially getting your paper written up in the New York Times and other publications.
Scientists tend to pay more attention to the big two than to other journals. When more scientists know about a particular paper, they’re more apt to cite it in their own papers. Being oftcited will increase a scientist’s "Impact Factor", a measure of how often papers are cited by peers. Funding agencies use the "Impact Factor" as a rough measure of the influence of scientists they’re considering supporting. [br] The expression "the cream of the crop" in paragraph 3 most likely means "______".
选项
A、the most of all
B、the best of all
C、the recently released
D、the widely spread
答案
B
解析
词汇题。“The cream of the crop”的意思是“精华”,也就是B项“the best of all”。根据文章的意思,《自然》和《科学》是两本最好科学期刊,所以记者每个星期都会从中挑选最好的科学论文。据此也可以得出正确答案应为B项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4054710.html
相关试题推荐
Astrongsupportfromthelocalauthorityis______tothesuccessoftheprojec
JanHendrikSchon’ssuccessseemedtoogoodtobetrue,anditwas.Inonly
JanHendrikSchon’ssuccessseemedtoogoodtobetrue,anditwas.Inonly
JanHendrikSchon’ssuccessseemedtoogoodtobetrue,anditwas.Inonly
JanHendrikSchon’ssuccessseemedtoogoodtobetrue,anditwas.Inonly
Whatdotheextraordinarilysuccessfulcompanieshaveincommon?Tofindout
Whatdotheextraordinarilysuccessfulcompanieshaveincommon?Tofindout
Whatdotheextraordinarilysuccessfulcompanieshaveincommon?Tofindout
Whatdotheextraordinarilysuccessfulcompanieshaveincommon?Tofindout
Womenwhoapplyforjobsinmiddleorseniormanagementhaveahighersuccess
随机试题
Howlongwillittaket6gettothemuseum?[originaltext]W:Hey,taxi!Ah,gre
Peoplehavewonderedforalongtimehowtheirpersonalitiesandbehaviorsa
在伤寒流行病学上具有重要意义的是A.恢复期带菌者 B.患者 C.慢性带菌者
.胆道出血的特点是:A.来势凶,出血量大 B.置三腔二囊管后可止血 C.
简述三种美术课中常用的教学模式。
尤其善于祛上半身风湿的药物是A.羌活 B.白芷 C.藁本 D.独活 E.
易风化潮解的药物应放在()A.阴凉干燥处 B.避光纸盒内 C.有色瓶中
高压熔断器更换前应退出可能误动的()。断路器$;$隔离开关$;$电压互感器$
服务型公关:指为获取社会公众的了解和好评,树立组织的良好形象,向消费者提供各种实
征信活动的特点有( )。A.独立性 B.权威性 C.信息性 D.公正性
最新回复
(
0
)