首页
登录
职称英语
Building on the base of evidence and interpretation in Hansen’ s ( 1994 ) qu
Building on the base of evidence and interpretation in Hansen’ s ( 1994 ) qu
游客
2025-04-21
30
管理
问题
Building on the base of evidence and interpretation in Hansen’ s ( 1994 ) qualitative study of working people’ s diaries, ,se assigned each diarist a set of codes to indicate employment, marital status, number of children, and size of the town in which he or she lived. To analyze the number, location and gender mix of visiting occasions, we coded each day in January and July for every year of the diary, counting the number of named visitors, the visitors’ gender, the size of the visiting occasion (1 to 4 people, or 5 and above), the gender mix of those present during the visit, and the location of the visit. While this may seem straightforward at first glance, the variable nature of the diary entries meant that the coding process was not as uncomplicated as we initially anticipated.
Given the number of diarists and the span of diary-keeping years, we faced the possibility of coding over 200,000 diary days. Because of the labor-intensive nature of the coding and the number of entries, we chose to code only 2 months—January and July—of each year a diarist kept a diary. We chose 2 months that could reflect a range of sociability. Severe January weather in New England impeded mobility, but it also freed those who were farmers from most of their labor-intensive chores. July tended to be haying season tbr farmers, which meant some people routinely worked all month in the fields—some alone, some with hired help. Further, the clement July weather meant grater mobility for all of the diary keepers. For some people—those who kept a diary for only a single year—the fact that we coded only 2 months out of each year meant we have only 62 "diary-days" to document their social lives. For others, we have several thousand. Limiting ourselves to January and July for each diary year, we nonetheless coded entries for a total of 24,752 diary days. In an effort to capture an accurate picture of visiting patterns, we coded every day of a given month, even those that had no entry or that mentioned only the weather, as well as those that recorded numerous visiting occasions in one day.
Determining a working definition of what constituted a visit was also an unexpected challenge. For example, although schoolteacher Mary Mudge kept a meticulous record of her visiting "rounds," listing names, places, and conversation topics, other diarists were not as forthcoming. A typical entry in farmer John Campbell’ s diary (9 July, 1825 ) was less amenable to our initial coding scheme: "Go to Carr’ s for Oxen." ( See Hansen and Mcdonald, 1995, for a fuller discussion of the pitfalls of coding diary data. ) We therefore created the following coding protocol.
We defined a visit as any occasion in which the diarist names the presence of individuals not of his or her household, the presence of the non-household member serving to distinguish between a community interaction and a household interaction. We also coded as visits public events at which the diarist was present but others in attendance were not named. The most common among these were records of church attendance. Although an entry "went to church" did not result in a finding of specific male or female visitors, it was a community interaction; thus, these entries were coded as gender-mixed visiting occasions of five or more people in a public place. Because of the variable nature of diary-keeping practices, we were careful to record only what we could confidently infer. Therefore, some entries record visits but no named individuals. Others, such as church attendance (which is generally a large-group event) or a visit to one named friend ( which is an intimate affair), allowed us to code the size of the group. Still others, when the location of the visit was specifically mentioned, allowed us to code the diarist as hosting, acting as a guest in another’ s home, or interaction at a public place. [br] What is the significance of Hansen’ s study to the passage?
选项
A、It was the foundation of the research.
B、It was the groundwork for the research.
C、It was the research that was coded.
D、It was the example used for the coding.
答案
A
解析
根据第一句Building on the base of evidence and interpretation in Hansen’s qualitative study,可见Hansen’s study为研究提供了基础。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/4047044.html
相关试题推荐
Themostconvincingevidencefortheimportanceofadultinfluenceonachil
Themostconvincingevidencefortheimportanceofadultinfluenceonachil
Themostconvincingevidencefortheimportanceofadultinfluenceonachil
Themostconvincingevidencefortheimportanceofadultinfluenceonachil
Themostconvincingevidencefortheimportanceofadultinfluenceonachil
Themostconvincingevidencefortheimportanceofadultinfluenceonachil
Themostconvincingevidencefortheimportanceofadultinfluenceonachil
Themostconvincingevidencefortheimportanceofadultinfluenceonachil
Themostconvincingevidencefortheimportanceofadultinfluenceonachil
Themostconvincingevidencefortheimportanceofadultinfluenceonachil
随机试题
Theageatwhichyoungchildrenbegintomakemoraldiscriminationsaboutha
Caesarwasright.Thinpeopleneedwatching.I’vebeenwatchingthemformos
WriteonANSWERSHEETTWOanoteofabout50~60wordsbasedonthefollowing
尺度较大的障板,对中、高频声波有下列哪种影响?( )A.无影响 B.反射
患者女性,68岁。反复咳嗽、喘息20年,加重1周入院。查体:神清,口唇发绀,颈静
暂态低电压的传感器属于(A)电容耦合式(B)电磁式(C)磁电式(D)
私营企业主王某办公用的一台电脑损坏,遂嘱秘书张某扔到垃圾站。张某将电脑搬到垃圾站
通过证券交易所的证券交易,投资者及其一致行动人拥有权益的股份达到一个上市公司已发
全球价值链通常由领先企业主导,其灵活运用企业国际化经营主要方式以获取其在全球价值
石油沥青的主要技术性质正确的是()A.塑性表示沥青延性 B.塑性好的沥青甚至开
最新回复
(
0
)