首页
登录
职称英语
Development Shortly after World War II, ’development
Development Shortly after World War II, ’development
游客
2025-02-17
20
管理
问题
Development
Shortly after World War II, ’development’ as we now understand it was set in motion. Western governments and donors poured money into new agencies that set about trying to stimulate the economies of underdeveloped countries. Because of this emphasis, it is now widely regarded as the Growth Model. Although we might expect poverty reduction to be the central objective, planners at this stage were primarily concerned with industrial development. It was hoped that the benefits of this would trickle down to poor people through raising incomes and providing employment opportunities, thereby indirectly lifting them above the ascribed poverty threshold of a dollar a day. The weaknesses of these assumptions were revealed, however, when poverty rates and economic growth were found to rises simultaneously in many countries.
During the 1970s, a new trend took over—trickle-up development. Instead of focusing on macro-economic policy and large-scale industrial projects, planners shifted attention to the core living requirements of individuals and communities. This be came know nap the Basic Needs Approach to development. It was hoped that through the provision of services such as community sanitation and literacyprogrammes, poverty could be eliminated from below. Economic growth was desirable but superfluous--Basic Needs redefined poverty fromi nvolving a lack of money to lacking the capability to attain full human potential. The trouble with Basic Needs programmers, however, was their expensive, resource-intensive nature that entailed continuous management and funding.
Since the 1980s, development planners have moved towards the Sustainable Livelihoods Approach, which emphasizes good livelihoods (materially and socially) that, most importantly, are independent and sustainable. ’Sustainable’ in this sense means that people are able to recover from the shocks and stresses of daily life, absolving agencies of the need to persistently monitor their lives. This approach emphasizes view of poverty that comes not from the rich but from the impoverished themselves, who are considered to be most suitably positioned to determine the poverty indicators that contribute to the multiple facets of their own deprivation. Although the Sustainable Livelihoods Approach has been criticized for lacking an environmental platform strong enough to respond to climate change, and for disassociating aspects of power and societal status from being a contestable part of development, it is currently the preferred model for development projects.
Though there is some linearity to the trajectory of development practice, with paradigms shifting in and out of fashion, vigorous scholarly debate persists around all approaches. The Growth Model, for example, is still defended by many theorists, particularly economists. Those who believe in the Growth Model insist that nothing trumps economic development as a tool for poverty alleviation for the developing countries (although there is often less enthusiasm for its applicability to the post-industrial West). Many countries that have focused explicitly on growth have managed to make considerable inroads into reducing poverty, even in the absence of a development programmed; Japan and Germany followed this route after World War II, as has China from the 1970s. On the other hand, some countries with massive inflows of funding for aid-based ’development projects’—particularly those in sub-Saharan Africa—have struggled to progress with meeting poverty reduction targets.
There is a good reason to be skeptical about the Growth Model, however, as is evidenced by the numerous societies that have partly imploded as a consequence of prioritizing economic growth above the work of human development. The experiences of many eastern European countries with health and employment crises in the early 1990s are particularly traumatic examples of this. The Growth Model also suffers from an undemocratic, and ’technocratic’, if not autocratic, method--underdeveloped countries frequently make policy decisions based on consultation with Western economists and institutions on how to generate growth. This dissolves the autonomy of communities to make their own decisions about what matters to them, and what kind of society they would like to build. The move to the Sustainable Livelihood Approach is a positive move in this regard, because by operating on a principle that decisions should be made by those who are affected by them, it introduces a role for localized decision-making.
It will be difficult, if not impossible, for any country in the near future to ignore economic growth as a development indicator while continuing to meet development targets. It is important, however, that we move away from seeing this type of growth as the prime objective for development. Development is ultimately about people, and human development must be placed at the forefront; economic growth is simply one tool out of many that can help us along the way. We also need to recognize that foreign advisers, whatever qualifications and knowledge they may possess, can sometimes be hindrance; local autonomymustbe respected for real development to occur. The Growth Model may have failed, but this does not render economic growth irrelevant. The Sustainable Livelihood Approach offers helpful and realistic alternatives. But it is folly to commit ourselves to a strictly-defined, systematic programmed—less constrictive mindsets will help us break the dive lament fashion cycle.
Questions 27-33
Complete the table below.
Choose NO MORE THAN TWO WORDS from the passage for each answer.
Write your answers in boxes 27-33 on your answer sheet.
[br]
选项
答案
Industrial development
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3960948.html
相关试题推荐
DevelopmentShortlyafterWorldWarII,’development
DevelopmentShortlyafterWorldWarII,’development
DevelopmentShortlyafterWorldWarII,’development
DevelopmentShortlyafterWorldWarII,’development
DevelopmentShortlyafterWorldWarII,’development
DevelopmentShortlyafterWorldWarII,’development
DevelopmentShortlyafterWorldWarII,’development
TheDevelopmentoftheModernHotAirBalloonThemodernhotai
TheDevelopmentofM
TheDevelopmentofM
随机试题
Inher26yearsofteachingEnglish,ShannonMcCuirehasseencountessmispla
"Areyoufeeling______?""Yes,I’mfinenow."A、anywellB、anybetterC、quitegoo
香港体育学院有限公司于2004年10月1日成立,旨在创造一个环境,能够发掘、培训及发展具有体育潜能之运动员,协助他们在体坛追求卓越。[br][audioF
关于交换式以太网的描述中,正确的是()。A.核心设备是集线器 B.需要执
在确定企业的收益分配政策时,应当考虑相关因素的影响,其中“资本保全约束”属于(
下列药物中,属于肝药酶抑制剂的是A.苯巴比妥B.水合氯醛C.氯霉素D.甘露醇E.
政府专营型旅游景区管理模式主要有()。A.国家直属模式 B.国家公园模式
企业赋予某类人员购进本公司一定股份的权利,是指买卖双方按( ),在特定的时间内
在有缝钢管上焊接分支管时,分支管外壁与其他焊缝中心的距离,应大于分支管外径,且不
A.鼠疫 B.黄热病 C.狂犬病 D.流行性感冒 E.水痘《传染病防治法
最新回复
(
0
)