2. 职称英语
  3. 　　　 Many prehistoric people subsisted as hunters and gatherers. Undoubtedly,

　　　 Many prehistoric people subsisted as hunters and gatherers. Undoubtedly,

游客2025-02-09  10
问题 　　　     Many prehistoric people subsisted as hunters and gatherers. Undoubtedly, game
　　　 animals, including some very large species, provided major components of human diets.
　　　 An important controversy centering on the question of human effects on prehistoric wildlife
　　　 concerns the sudden disappearance of so many species of large animals at or near the end
(5)    of the Pleistocene epoch. Most paleontologists suspect that abrupt changes in climate led
　　　 to the mass extinctions. Others, however, have concluded that prehistoric people drove
　　　 many of those species to extinction through over-hunting. In their "Pleistocene overkill
　　　 hypothesis," they cite what seems to be a remarkable coincidence between the arrival of
　　　 prehistoric peoples in North and South America and the time during which mammoths,
(10)    giant ground sloths, the giant bison, and numerous other large mammals became extinct.
　　　 Perhaps the human species was driving others to extinction long before the dawn of history.
　　　 Hunter-gatherers may have contributed to Pleistocene extinctions in more indirect
　　　 ways. Besides over-hunting, at least three other kinds of effects have been suggested:
　　　 direct competition, imbalances between competing species of game animals, and early
(15)    agricultural practices. Direct competition may have brought about the demise of large
　　　 carnivores such as the saber-toothed cats. These animals simply may have been unable
　　　 to compete with the increasingly sophisticated hunting skills of Pleistocene people.
　　　 Human hunters could have caused imbalances among game animals, leading to the
　　　 extinctions of species less able to compete. When other predators such as the gray wolf
(20)    prey upon large mammals, they generally take high proportions of each year s crop of
　　　 young. Some human hunters, in contrast, tend to take the various age-groups of large animals
　　　 in proportion to their actual occurrence. If such hunters first competed with the larger
　　　 predators and then replaced them. they may have allowed more young to survive each year,
　　　 gradually increasing the populations of favored species As these populations expanded,
(25)    they in turn may have competed with other game species for the same environmental niche,
　　　 forcing the less hunted species into extinction. This theory, suggests that human hunters
　　　 played an indirect role in Pleistocene extinctions by hunting one species more than another.
选项 A、The effects of human activities on prehistoric wildlife
B、The origins of the hunter-gatherer way of life
C、The diets of large animals of the Pleistocene epoch
D、The change in climate at the end of the Pleistocene epoch
答案 A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3950002.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)