首页
登录
职称英语
→ Holmes and Rahe (1967) developed the Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS
→ Holmes and Rahe (1967) developed the Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS
游客
2025-02-08
8
管理
问题
→ Holmes and Rahe (1967) developed the Social Readjustment Rating Scale (SRRS) to measure life change as a form of stress.A The scale assigns numerical values to 43 major life events that are supposed to reflect the magnitude of the readjustment required by each change. In responding to the scale, respondents are asked to indicate how often they experienced any of these 43 events during a certain time period (typically, the past year). The person then adds up the numbers associated with each event checked. B
→ The SRRS and similar scales have been used in thousands of studies by researchers all over the world.C Overall, these studies have shown that people with higher scores on the SRRS tend to be more vulnerable to many kinds of physical illness—and many types of psychological problems as well (Derogatis & Coons, 1993; Gruen, 1993; Scully, Tosi & Banning, 2000).D More recently, however, experts have criticized this research, citing problems with the methods used and raising questions about the meaning of the findings (Critelli & Ee, 1996; Monroe & McQuaid, 1994; Wethington, 2000).
First, the assumption that the SRRS measures change exclusively has been shown to be inaccurate. We now have ample evidence that the desirability of events affects adaptational outcomes more than the amount of change that
they
require (Turner & Wheaton, 1995). Thus, it seems prudent to view the SRRS as a measure of
diverse
forms of stress, rather than as a measure of change-related stress (McLean & Link, 1994).
→ Second, the SRRS fails to take into account differences among people in their subjective perception of how stressful an event is. For instance, while divorce may deserve a stress value of 73 for most people, a particular person’s divorce might generate much less stress and merit a value of only 25.
→ Third, many of the events listed on the SRRS and similar scales are highly ambiguous, leading people to be inconsistent as to which events they report experiencing (Monroe & McQuaid, 1994). For instance, what qualifies as "trouble with the boss"? Should you check that because you’re sick and tired of your supervisor? What constitutes a "change in living conditions"? Does your purchase of a great new sound system qualify? As you can see, the SRRS includes many "events" that are described inadequately, producing considerable ambiguity about the meaning of one’s response. Problems in recalling events over a period of a year also lead to inconsistent responding on stress scales, thus lowering their reliability (Klein & Rubovits, 1987).
Fourth, the SRRS does not sample from the domain of stressful events very thoroughly. Do the 43 events listed on the SRRS exhaust all the major stresses that people typically experience? Studies designed to explore that question have found many significant omissions (Dohrenwend et al., 1993; Wheaton, 1994).
→ Fifth, the correlation between SRRS scores and health outcomes may be inflated because subjects’ neuroticism affects both their responses to stress scales and their self-reports of health problems. Neurotic individuals have a tendency to recall more stress than others and to recall more symptoms of illness than others (Watson, David, & Suls, 1999). These tendencies mean that some of the correlation between high stress and high illness may simply reflect the effects of subjects’ neuroticism (Critelli & Ee, 1996). The possible contami- nating effects of neuroticism obscure the meaning of scores on the SRRS and similar measures of stress. The Life Experiences Survey
In the light of these problems, a number of researchers have attempted to develop improved versions of the SRRS. For example, the Life Experiences Survey (LES), assembled by Irwin Sarason and colleagues (1978), has become a widely used measure of stress in contemporary research (for examples see Ames et al., 2001; Denisoff & Endler, 2000; Malefo, 2000). The LES revises and builds on the SRRS survey in a variety of ways that correct, at least in part, most of the problems just discussed.
→ Specifically, the LES recognizes that stress involves more than mere change and asks respondents to indicate whether events had a positive or negative impact on them. This strategy permits the computation of positive change, negative change, and total change scores, which helps researchers gain much more insight into which facets of stress are most crucial. The LES also takes into consideration differences among people in their appraisal of stress, by dropping the normative weights and replacing them with personally assigned weightings of the impact of relevant events. Ambiguity in items is decreased by providing more elaborate descriptions of many items to clarify their meaning.
The LES deals with the failure of the SRRS to sample the full domain of stressful events in several ways. First, some significant omissions from the SRRS have been added to the LES. Second, the LES allows the respondent to write in personally important events that are not included on the scale. Third, the LES has an extra section just for students. Sarason et al. (1978) suggest that special, tailored sections of this sort be added for specific populations whenever it is useful. [br] According to paragraph 7, why is the SRRS inappropriate for people with neuroses?
选项
A、They are ill more often, which affects their scores on the scale.
B、Their self-reporting on the scale is affected by their neuroses.
C、They tend to suffer more stress than people without neuroses.
D、Their response to stress will probably not be recorded on the scale.
答案
B
解析
... subjects’ neuroticism affects both their responses to stress scales and their self-reports of health problems." Choice A is not correct because they recall more symptoms, but they are not ill more often. Choice C is not correct because they recall more stress, but they do not necessarily suffer more actual stress. Choice D is not correct because the effects of neuroticism obscures the meaning of the scores that are recorded.
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3948367.html
相关试题推荐
→HolmesandRahe(1967)developedtheSocialReadjustmentRatingScale(SRRS
→HolmesandRahe(1967)developedtheSocialReadjustmentRatingScale(SRRS
→HolmesandRahe(1967)developedtheSocialReadjustmentRatingScale(SRRS
→HolmesandRahe(1967)developedtheSocialReadjustmentRatingScale(SRRS
→HolmesandRahe(1967)developedtheSocialReadjustmentRatingScale(SRRS
→HolmesandRahe(1967)developedtheSocialReadjustmentRatingScale(SRRS
→HolmesandRahe(1967)developedtheSocialReadjustmentRatingScale(SRRS
→HolmesandRahe(1967)developedtheSocialReadjustmentRatingScale(SRRS
"LayersofSocialClass"Takentogether,income,occupa
"LayersofSocialClass"Takentogether,income,occupa
随机试题
ACoolerPlanetScientistsarecookingupsolution
RiseofCivilizationsandEmpiresHistoriansoftenwrite
胎儿苍白型窒息的表现是A.对外界刺激有反应 B.喉反射消失;肌张力松弛 C.
下列关于关税特点的说法,不正确的是()。A.征收的对象是进出境的货物和物品
下列()属于思想政治课程资源中的实践活动资源。A.图书、报纸 B.电影、
地方总预算草案由地方各级政府财政部门具体编制,经本级政府审定后,提请()审查批
被征收房屋价值的补偿,包含被征收房屋占用范围内土地使用权的价值,以及房屋室内装饰
利率灵敏度可分为()。A:利率损失敏感性B:利率收益敏感性C:资产负债市值的
居住在A国的我国公民甲创作一部英文小说,乙经许可将该小说翻译成中文小说,丙经许可
有高血压的内分泌疾病中,尿儿茶酚胺增多见于 A.甲状腺功能亢进 B.库欣综合
最新回复
(
0
)