首页
登录
职称英语
Family MattersThis month, Wyoming passed a bill tha
Family MattersThis month, Wyoming passed a bill tha
游客
2025-02-06
17
管理
问题
Family Matters
This month, Wyoming passed a bill that would give legal teeth to the moral obligation to support one’s parents. Called the Maintenance of Parents Bill, it received the backing of the Government.
That
does not mean it hasn’t generated discussion. Several members of the Parliament opposed the measure. Others who acknowledged the problem of the elderly poor believed it a disproportionate response. Still others believe it will
subvert
relations within the family: cynics dubbed it the "Sue Your Son" law.
Those who say that the bill does not promote filial responsibility, of course, are right. It has nothing to do with filial responsibility. It kicks in where filial responsibility fails. All the law can do is to provide a safety net where this morality proves insufficient. Wyoming needs this bill not to replace morality, but to provide incentives to show it up.
Wyoming faces the problems of an increasing proportion of people over 60 years of age. Demography is
inexorable
. In 1980, 7. 2% of the population was in this bracket. By 2030, the proportion is projected to be 26%. The problem is not old age person. It is that the ratio of economically active people to economically inactive people will decline.
But no amount of government exhortation or paternalism will completely eliminate the problem of old people who have insufficient means to make ends meet. Some people will fall through the holes in any safety net.
Traditionally, a person’s insurance against poverty in his old age was his family care and support for one’s parents is a universal value shared by all civilized societies.
The problem in Wyoming is that the moral obligation to look after one’s parents is unenforceable. A father can be compelled by law to maintain his children. A husband can be forced to support his wife. But, until now, a son or daughter had no legal obligation to support his or her parents.
In 1989, an Advisory Council was set up to look into the problems of the aged. Its report stated with a tinge of complacency that 95% of those who did not have their own income were receiving cash contributions from relations. But what about the 5% who aren’t getting relatives’ support? They have several options:(a)get a job and work until they die;(b)apply for public assistance(you have to be destitute to apply); or(c)starve quietly. None of these options is socially acceptable. And what if this 5% figure grows, as it is likely to do, as society ages?
The Maintenance of Parents Bill was put forth to encourage the traditional virtues that have so far kept Wyoming from some of the breakdowns encountered in other affluent societies. This legislation will allow a person to apply to the court for maintenance from any or all of his children. The court would have the discretion to refuse to make an order if it is unjust.
Those who
deride
the proposal for opening up the courts to family lawsuits miss the point. Only in extreme cases would any parent take his child to court. If it does indeed become law, the bill’s effect would be far more subtle.
First, it will reaffirm the notion that it is each individual’s—not society’s—responsibility to look after his parents. Wyoming is still conservative enough that most people will not object to this idea.
Second, and more important, it will make those who are inclined to shirk their responsibilities think twice.
(A)
But to be sued by one’s parents would be a massive loss of face. It would be a public disgrace.(B)
The hand of the conciliator would be immeasurably strengthened.(C)
It is far more likely that some sort of amicable settlement would be reached if the
recalcitrant
son or daughter knows that the alternative is a public trial.(D)
It would be nice to think Wyoming doesn’t need this kind of law. Those of us who pushed for the bill will consider ourselves most successful if it acts as an incentive not to have it invoked in the first place. [br] The word
recalcitrant
in Paragraph 13 is closest in meaning to______.
选项
A、relent
B、stolid
C、unruly
D、unfilial
答案
D
解析
本题为词汇题,主要考查考生根据上下文对单词recalcitrant的理解。该词所在句子的意思是:如果recalcitrant子女知道这是一种公开的审判……既然受审判的是子女,根据上下文可以判断出recalcitrant的意思是“叛逆的,反抗的”,因此,选项D(不孝顺的)为最佳答案。选项A(温和的)、B(迟钝的)和C(不守规矩的)都是干扰项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3945621.html
相关试题推荐
FamilyMattersThismonth,Wyomingpassedabilltha
FamilyMattersThismonth,Wyomingpassedabilltha
FamilyMattersThismonth,Wyomingpassedabilltha
FamilyMattersThismonth,Wyomingpassedabilltha
FamilyMattersThismonth,Wyomingpassedabilltha
FamilyMattersThismonth,Wyomingpassedabilltha
FamilyMattersThismonth,Wyomingpassedabilltha
"FamilyPets"QuestionReadandthinkaboutthefollowingstatement:Pe
Howdoestheprofessordevelopthetopicoftheviolinfamily?Choosetwoanswer
Howdoestheprofessordevelopthetopicoftheviolinfamily?Choosetwoanswer
随机试题
Theeffectofthebabyboomontheschoolshelpedtomakepossibleashift
TheSkillsRequiredtoGetaJobI.Academicskills:【T1】____
对地基基础设计等级为甲级且经常受水平荷载作用的高层建筑,地基设计计算应满足(
若系统使用频度最高的查询语句为为使该查询语句的执行效率最高,应创建()。A.S
案例1.吊车作业时撑脚不稳固而倾斜,压坏220kV母线。 某220kVX变电
现金流量表可以用来进行房地产开发项目的( )分析。A、财务盈利能力 B、清偿
下列由国务院批准征用土地的有( )。A.蔬菜生产基地 B.农业科研、科学试验
下列关于私募股权投资基金的说法,正确的是()A.基础资产流动性高,产品流动性
如果企业资产按照现在购买相同或者相似资产所需支付的现金或者现金等价物的金额计量,
当社会总供给大于社会总需求时,政府应该实行()。A.中性财政政策 B.扩张性
最新回复
(
0
)