2. 职称英语
  3. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people should try s

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people should try s

游客2025-02-04  9
问题 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Young people should try several different jobs before they take a long-term career.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. Be sure to use your own words. Do not use memorized examples.
选项
答案     Choosing one’s career is one of the most important things in one’s lifetime. It is argued that young people should try several different jobs before they take a long-term career. I do not agree with this opinion as I think the advantages of trying different jobs are overshadowed by the disadvantages.
    Firstly, it takes time to accumulate experience and develop expertise in a field while trying different jobs goes contrary to this process. One’s energy and resources are not unlimited. By focusing on a certain field instead of spreading attention on several different fields, one can achieve in-depth understanding of a job. This is particularly true in jobs that require high-level of intelligence and experience. For example, it takes years to train a medical student into a doctor. If a medical student decides to try several other jobs before taking a long-term career, he or she would probably lose the opportunity of becoming a doctor for good. Long-term careers such as doctors require continuous dedication and effort. Any interruptions are likely to impair their skills.
    Secondly, the society works most efficiently if employees are highly specialized. In other words, more value will be created if people are doing what they are good at. People have chosen the major they are interested in when they are enrolled in colleges and universities. They have four years to learn about their potential career choices and try other possibilities by taking part-time jobs or internships. If they try other jobs before taking a long-term career after graduation, the society would lack skilled employees in corresponding positions.
    Understandably, the proposition specified in the question takes into consideration the individual’s potential in various aspects. I agree that a person can be successful in more than one field and he or she should have the freedom to make career choices. However, many jobs require long-term input and accumulation of knowledge and experience. Trying other jobs that are not one’s expertise would possibly result in a waste of resources. Besides doctors, other typical examples that support my view are scientists and researchers. To be a scientist or a researcher, it takes at least an extra five years’ education for an undergraduate student to obtain a Ph.D. degree. Choosing a job that is directly related to one’s field of expertise after graduation is apparently the most suitable choice for an individual and the society.
解析     第1段：引入话题，提出自己的观点。总结题干主题：择业。改写题目，提出自己的观点：尝试不同工作的弊大于利。
    第2段：提出第一个理由，从行业层面来论述。第一句是这段的主论点：想要对一个行业有深入了解需要长时间去积累经验和发展专业知识，对这一理由展开论述。以医生这个职业作为例子来论证论点，使文章更加有说服力。
    第3段：提出第二个理由，上升到社会层面。第一句是主论点：雇员的专业化程度越高，社会工作效率越高。第二句是对主题句的展开说明。说明人们择业的背景——他们选择了感兴趣的专业，而且在大学期间可以尝试其他的职业可能性。说明对立观点的弊端，从反面佐证所选立场。
    第4段：总结段。让步说明对方立场的可取之处。话锋一转，说明对方立场的弊端——造成资源浪费，进一步举出科学家和科研人员的例子来证明所选立场。最后总结全文。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3942154.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)