首页
登录
职称英语
If there is any endeavor whose fruits should be freely available, that endeav
If there is any endeavor whose fruits should be freely available, that endeav
游客
2025-01-20
19
管理
问题
If there is any endeavor whose fruits should be freely available, that endeavor is surely publicly financed science. Morally, taxpayers who wish to should be able to read about it without further expense. And science advances through cross-fertilization between projects. Barriers to that exchange slow it down.
There is a widespread feeling that the journal publishers who have mediated this exchange for the past century or more are becoming an impediment to it. One of the latest converts is the British government. Recently it announced that, the results of taxpayer-financed research would be available, free and online, for anyone to read and redistribute.
Britain’s government is not alone. Soon the European Union followed suit. In the U.S., the National Institutes of Health (NIH, the single biggest source of civilian research funds in the world) has required open-access publishing since 2008. And the Wellcome Trust, a British foundation that is the world’s second-biggest charitable source of scientific money, after the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, also insists that those who receive its support should make their work available free.
Criticism of journal publishers usually boils down to two things. One is that their processes take months, when the Internet could enable them to take days. The other is that because each paper is like a mini-monopoly, which workers in the field have to read if they are to advance their own research, there is no incentive to keep the price down. The publishers thus have scientists — or, more accurately, their universities, which pay the subscriptions — in an armlock. That, combined with the fact that the raw material (manuscripts of papers) is free, leads to generous returns. In 2011, Elsevier, a large Dutch publisher, made a profit of £768 million on revenues of £2.06 billion — a margin of 37 percent. Indeed, Elsevier’s profits are thought so
egregious
by many people that 12,000 researchers have signed up to boycott the company’s journals.
Publishers do provide a service. They organize peer reviews, in which papers are criticized anonymously by experts (though those experts, like the authors of papers, are seldom paid for what they do). They also sort the scientific sheep from the goats, by deciding what gets published, and where. That gives the publishers huge power. Since researchers, administrators and grant-awarding bodies all take note of which work has got through this filtering mechanism, the competition to publish in the best journals is intense, and the system becomes self-reinforcing, increasing the value of those journals still further.
But not, perhaps, for much longer. Support has been swelling for open-access scientific publishing: doing it online, in a way that allows anyone to read papers free of charge. The movement started among scientists themselves, but governments are paying attention and asking whether they might also benefit from the change.
Much remains to be worked out. Some fear the loss of the traditional journals’ curation and verification of research. Even Sir Mark Walport, the director of the Wellcome Trust and a fierce advocate of open-access publication, worries that the newly liberated papers have ended up in different places rather than being consolidated in the way they want.
A revolution, then, has begun. Technology permits it; researchers and politicians want it. If scientific publishers are not trembling in their boots, they should be. [br] The author mentions the concerns of Sir Mark Walport, who______.
选项
A、strongly supports current publishing arrangements and models
B、worries about the poor quality of current scientific publication
C、believes that the weaknesses of open-access journals can easily be overcome
D、is afraid that good papers in open-access journals may be neglected
答案
D
解析
细节题。根据关键词定位原文第7段第2句,可知Sir Mark Walport强烈支持科研论文通过网络发表,但同时对这些论文的前景感到担忧,因为这种改革失去了传统审稿的保障。由此排除A和B,因为这两个选项是针对现行出版制度而言的,C选项在文中未提及,故选D(担心免费获取的期刊优秀论文可能被忽视)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3920563.html
相关试题推荐
Everyoneshouldgetthedimetoday,oritwillbetoolatetogetthecontract.A
Itisincredibletosayaggressionagainstthesmallcountryshouldnothavebee
Lifeinsurance,beforeavailableonlytoyoung,healthypersons,cannowbeobta
Thenameofabookcannotbeshownbydoublequotes.Butshoulduseitalics.A、n
ItisimperativethatalltheaccountsofthePropertyManagementCompanyshould
Ifthereisanyendeavorwhosefruitsshouldbefreelyavailable,thatendeav
Ifthereisanyendeavorwhosefruitsshouldbefreelyavailable,thatendeav
Ifthereisanyendeavorwhosefruitsshouldbefreelyavailable,thatendeav
Ifthereisanyendeavorwhosefruitsshouldbefreelyavailable,thatendeav
Inthecourseofpreparinghisspeech,heshouldbeclearlyawareofhowtomake
随机试题
WhichofthefollowingisNOTthefunctionoflanguage?A、Metalingualfunction.B
4Ω电阻、1H电感和1F电容串联二阶电路的零输入响应属于()情况。A.过
审计人员对被审计单位的材料采购业务进行实质性测试,审查的内容有()。A.材
下列哪项是“方从法出”的含义A.方剂体现治法 B.先有法后有方 C.根据治法
A.肠产毒型大肠埃希菌B.肠致病型大肠埃希菌C.肠侵袭型大肠埃希菌D.肠出血型大
“搭便车”现象是对下列各项中( )的一种形象的比喻。A.社会福利问题 B.市
关于模板支架刚度验算要求的说法错误的有()。A.梁的底模板荷载组合需要考虑混凝
为了达到大城市中心职能疏解的目的,往往需在城市的部分重点地区新建一些反磁力中心的
职业健康安全技术措施是以预防工伤事故为目的,应包括()。A.防护装置 B.保险
某安装公司承接一高层商务楼的通风空调安装工程,该商务楼位于沿海城市的闹市中心,周
最新回复
(
0
)