首页
登录
职称英语
Towards the end of "Thinking, Fast and Slow", Daniel Kahneman laments that h
Towards the end of "Thinking, Fast and Slow", Daniel Kahneman laments that h
游客
2024-12-24
19
管理
问题
Towards the end of "Thinking, Fast and Slow", Daniel Kahneman laments that he and his late collaborator, Amos Tversky, are often credited with showing that humans make "irrational" choices. That term is too strong, he says, to describe the variety of mental mishaps to which people systematically fall prey. Readers of his book may disagree. Mr. Kahneman, an Israeli-American psychologist and Nobel economics laureate, has delivered a full catalogue of the biases, shortcuts and cognitive illusions to which our species regularly succumbs. In doing so he makes it plain that Homo economicus—the rational model of human behaviour beloved of economists—is as fantastical as a unicorn.
In one experiment described by Mr. Kahneman, participants asked to imagine that they have been given £50 behave differently depending on whether they are then told they can "keep" £20 or must "lose" £ 30—though the outcomes are identical. He also shows that it is more threatening to say that a disease kills "1, 286 in every 10, 000 people", than to say it kills "24.14% of the population", even though the second mention is twice as deadly. Vivid language often overrides basic arithmetic.
Some findings are downright peculiar. Experimental subjects who have been "primed" to think of money, perhaps by seeing a picture of dollar bills, will act more selfishly. So if someone nearby drops some pencils, these subjects will pick up fewer than their non-primed counterparts. Even obliquely suggesting the concept of old age will inspire people to walk more slowly—though feeling elderly never crossed their mind, they will later report.
After all this the human brain looks less like a model of rationality and more like a giddy teenager: flighty, easily distracted and lacking in self-awareness. Yet this book is not a counsel of despair. Its awkward title refers to Mr. Kahneman’s two-tier model of cognition: "System 1" is quick, intuitive and responsible for the quirks and mistakes described above (and many others). "System 2", by contrast, is slow, deliberative and less prone to error. System 2 kicks in when we are faced with particularly complex problems, but much of the time it is all too happy to let the impulsive System 1 get its way.
What, then, is System 1 good for? Rather a lot, it turns out. In a world that often demands swift judgment and rapid decision-making, a creature who solely relied on deliberative thinking wouldn’t last long. Moreover, System 1 generally works well. As Mr. Kahneman says, "most of our judgments and actions are appropriate most of the time". He urges readers to counteract what he considers to be mistakes of System 1 thinking, such as the "loss aversion" that deters people from accepting favourable gambles (such as a 50-50 chance to win $ 200 or lose $ 100). He also recommends checking the performance of an investment portfolio no more than once a quarter, to limit needless anguish over short-term fluctuations and the "useless churning" of shares.
Mr. Kahneman does not dwell on the possible evolutionary origins of our cognitive biases, nor does he devote much time to considering why some people seem naturally better at avoiding error than others. Still this book, his first for a non-specialist audience, is a profound one. As Copernicus removed the Earth from the centre of the universe and Darwin knocked humans off their biological perch. Mr. Kahneman has shown that we are not the paragons of reason we assume ourselves to be. Often hailed as the father of behavioural economics (with Tversky as co-parent), his work has influenced a range of disciplines and has even inspired some policy.
But the true consequences of his findings are only starting to emerge. When he presents the poor victims of his experiments with conclusive proof of their errors, the typical reaction is not a chastened pledge to shape up, but confused silence, followed by business as usual. No one likes to be told he is wrong. [br] The word "mishaps" in Paragraph 1 probably means
选项
A、problems.
B、dilemmas.
C、choices.
D、models.
答案
A
解析
语义题。由题干直接定位至首段第二旬。接着第四句就Mr.Kahneman的新书内容做出说明(…a full catalogue of the biases,shortcuts and cognitive illusions to which our species regularly sac-cumbs),这里的our species regularly succumbs与which people systematically fall prey意思相同,可见mental mishaps包含biases,shortcuts,cognitive illusions等内容,而偏见、心理捷径以及认知幻想等都属于心理问题,因此[A]符合文意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3882329.html
相关试题推荐
Allofthefollowinggroupshavebeenthinkingaboutthequestionabouthappines
Allofthefollowinggroupshavebeenthinkingaboutthequestionabouthappines
Allofthefollowinggroupshavebeenthinkingaboutthequestionabouthappines
TowardstheendofThinking,FastandSlow,DanielKahnemanlamentsthathe
TowardstheendofThinking,FastandSlow,DanielKahnemanlamentsthathe
TowardstheendofThinking,FastandSlow,DanielKahnemanlamentsthathe
ThehostilepublicattitudeinTurkeytowardsIsraeliscausedby[originaltext]
Towardstheendof"Thinking,FastandSlow",DanielKahnemanlamentsthath
Towardstheendof"Thinking,FastandSlow",DanielKahnemanlamentsthath
ThenovelGulliver’sTravelsiswrittenbyA、DanielDefoe.B、JonathanSwift.C、Fr
随机试题
【B1】[br]【B4】[originaltext]Tousitseemsnaturaltoputupanumbrellato
[originaltext]Approximately90%ofpeopleintheworldarenaturallyright-
HarlemRenaissancereferstoaperiodlastingformorethan10years,duringwhi
气体爆炸的破坏程度和爆炸威力比粉尘爆炸大。()
()是以信息技术为主要手段建立的信息采集、存储、处理的系统。A.信息网络系统
男,54岁,活动后气急、咳嗽2年,逐渐加重,干咳无痰,无夜间盗汗及发热。查体双下
可以用来表示药物安全性的是:A.最小有效量 B.最大有效量 C.治疗指数
A.价值原则B.效率、效益原则C.优先原则D.不伤害原则E.公平公正原则人人享受
2021年第一季度各月稀土及其制品出口额的同比增量排序正确的是:A.2月>3
故障诊断是通过诊断装置获取设备运行状态的信息,再对信息进行识别,以监视和预测设备
最新回复
(
0
)