首页
登录
职称英语
Towards the end of "Thinking, Fast and Slow", Daniel Kahneman laments that h
Towards the end of "Thinking, Fast and Slow", Daniel Kahneman laments that h
游客
2024-12-24
23
管理
问题
Towards the end of "Thinking, Fast and Slow", Daniel Kahneman laments that he and his late collaborator, Amos Tversky, are often credited with showing that humans make "irrational" choices. That term is too strong, he says, to describe the variety of mental mishaps to which people systematically fall prey. Readers of his book may disagree. Mr. Kahneman, an Israeli-American psychologist and Nobel economics laureate, has delivered a full catalogue of the biases, shortcuts and cognitive illusions to which our species regularly succumbs. In doing so he makes it plain that Homo economicus—the rational model of human behaviour beloved of economists—is as fantastical as a unicorn.
In one experiment described by Mr. Kahneman, participants asked to imagine that they have been given £50 behave differently depending on whether they are then told they can "keep" £20 or must "lose" £ 30—though the outcomes are identical. He also shows that it is more threatening to say that a disease kills "1, 286 in every 10, 000 people", than to say it kills "24.14% of the population", even though the second mention is twice as deadly. Vivid language often overrides basic arithmetic.
Some findings are downright peculiar. Experimental subjects who have been "primed" to think of money, perhaps by seeing a picture of dollar bills, will act more selfishly. So if someone nearby drops some pencils, these subjects will pick up fewer than their non-primed counterparts. Even obliquely suggesting the concept of old age will inspire people to walk more slowly—though feeling elderly never crossed their mind, they will later report.
After all this the human brain looks less like a model of rationality and more like a giddy teenager: flighty, easily distracted and lacking in self-awareness. Yet this book is not a counsel of despair. Its awkward title refers to Mr. Kahneman’s two-tier model of cognition: "System 1" is quick, intuitive and responsible for the quirks and mistakes described above (and many others). "System 2", by contrast, is slow, deliberative and less prone to error. System 2 kicks in when we are faced with particularly complex problems, but much of the time it is all too happy to let the impulsive System 1 get its way.
What, then, is System 1 good for? Rather a lot, it turns out. In a world that often demands swift judgment and rapid decision-making, a creature who solely relied on deliberative thinking wouldn’t last long. Moreover, System 1 generally works well. As Mr. Kahneman says, "most of our judgments and actions are appropriate most of the time". He urges readers to counteract what he considers to be mistakes of System 1 thinking, such as the "loss aversion" that deters people from accepting favourable gambles (such as a 50-50 chance to win $ 200 or lose $ 100). He also recommends checking the performance of an investment portfolio no more than once a quarter, to limit needless anguish over short-term fluctuations and the "useless churning" of shares.
Mr. Kahneman does not dwell on the possible evolutionary origins of our cognitive biases, nor does he devote much time to considering why some people seem naturally better at avoiding error than others. Still this book, his first for a non-specialist audience, is a profound one. As Copernicus removed the Earth from the centre of the universe and Darwin knocked humans off their biological perch. Mr. Kahneman has shown that we are not the paragons of reason we assume ourselves to be. Often hailed as the father of behavioural economics (with Tversky as co-parent), his work has influenced a range of disciplines and has even inspired some policy.
But the true consequences of his findings are only starting to emerge. When he presents the poor victims of his experiments with conclusive proof of their errors, the typical reaction is not a chastened pledge to shape up, but confused silence, followed by business as usual. No one likes to be told he is wrong. [br] The word "mishaps" in Paragraph 1 probably means
选项
A、problems.
B、dilemmas.
C、choices.
D、models.
答案
A
解析
语义题。由题干直接定位至首段第二旬。接着第四句就Mr.Kahneman的新书内容做出说明(…a full catalogue of the biases,shortcuts and cognitive illusions to which our species regularly sac-cumbs),这里的our species regularly succumbs与which people systematically fall prey意思相同,可见mental mishaps包含biases,shortcuts,cognitive illusions等内容,而偏见、心理捷径以及认知幻想等都属于心理问题,因此[A]符合文意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3882329.html
相关试题推荐
Allofthefollowinggroupshavebeenthinkingaboutthequestionabouthappines
Allofthefollowinggroupshavebeenthinkingaboutthequestionabouthappines
Allofthefollowinggroupshavebeenthinkingaboutthequestionabouthappines
TowardstheendofThinking,FastandSlow,DanielKahnemanlamentsthathe
TowardstheendofThinking,FastandSlow,DanielKahnemanlamentsthathe
TowardstheendofThinking,FastandSlow,DanielKahnemanlamentsthathe
ThehostilepublicattitudeinTurkeytowardsIsraeliscausedby[originaltext]
Towardstheendof"Thinking,FastandSlow",DanielKahnemanlamentsthath
Towardstheendof"Thinking,FastandSlow",DanielKahnemanlamentsthath
ThenovelGulliver’sTravelsiswrittenbyA、DanielDefoe.B、JonathanSwift.C、Fr
随机试题
Duringthe1980s,unemploymentandunderemploymentinsomecountrieswasas
国家电网有限公司供电服务“十项承诺”明确,城市电网平均供电可靠率达到(),居
对于管理会计职业道德中的诚信,下面哪个描述不正确()。A.诚信,包括诚实和信守承
给家兔静脉注射抗利尿激素后尿量减少,尿液渗透压增高。该动物尿量减少的主要机制是远
下列选项中,不属于瑞士官方语言的是( )。A.德语 B.法语 C.英语
下面四个图形中,只有一个是由上面的四个图形拼合(只能通过上、下、左、右平移)而成
人们经常听到“信息”和“控制”这两个字眼,但往往说不清它们的确切含义。实际上,我
反洗钱国际组织及许多国家都将反洗钱恐怖融资和反扩散融资纳入反洗钱工作范畴,关于恐
苏联心理学家彼得罗夫斯基以中学生为研究对象设计了一个实验:给学生一份问卷,问卷中
经过银行存款余额调节表调节后的存款余额,是企业可动用的银行存款实有数。()
最新回复
(
0
)