首页
登录
职称英语
Citing Ohio ordinances that allow individuals to seek charges against someon
Citing Ohio ordinances that allow individuals to seek charges against someon
游客
2025-01-18
11
管理
问题
Citing Ohio ordinances that allow individuals to seek charges against someone they’ve seen commit a crime, seven Euclid residents claim to have "witnessed" the encounter between Officer Michael Amiott and driver Richard Hubbard III by virtue of viewing a four-minute video on Facebook. Their unique argument has triggered discussion in the legal community about the role that "social media witnesses" could play in such cases.
"It used to just be the police officer’s word against the victim’s word," notes lead petitioner Richard T. Montgomery II. "Now, in the age of cellphone videos and social media, we as a community have the opportunity to participate in ensuring police accountability."
The racially and economically diverse group scored its first victory in late December when a municipal judge responded to its request by requiring the Cuyahoga County prosecutor to investigate Amiott for felonious assault during the August 2017 traffic stop.
The cellphone video, which has more than 11 million views on Facebook, shows the officer repeatedly punching Hubbard’s head as the 25-year-old man lay in the street. Separate video from a police cruiser’s dash cam shows Amiott wrestling Hubbard to the ground moments after he was ordered out of his car for a suspended driver’s license.
Amiott was fired two months later for excessive force. But in the majority-black city, emotions flared anew this October when he was rehired following an arbitrator’s ruling in his favor. The ensuing outcry included the NAACP announcing a travel advisory to people of color who might be driving through Euclid.
The legal issues raised by the citizens’ petition and the prospect of witnesses via social media are largely untested.
Cleveland attorney Rebecca Maurer, who wrote a popular blog about the "Serial" podcast’s recent focus on Cuyahoga County’s criminal justice system, expects such witnesses might have to first establish that they were somehow personally affected before being allowed to initiate charges.
"The judicial system relies on the idea of ’standing’ to regulate the type of cases that go to court," she said. "A judge who borrows from standing theory will want to know exactly why social media witnesses should initiate the case. Perhaps it’s enough if the petitioners are local residents claiming a personal stake in the security of their community."
In his ruling referring the matter to the county prosecutor, Euclid Municipal Judge Patrick Gallagher did point out that the petitioners fail to claim any "personal knowledge of Mr. Hubbard’s injuries." Had they done so, he could have taken more
drastic
action, the judge seemed to imply. Under Ohio law, Gallagher also could have used the citizens’ petition to circumvent the prosecutor’s office and issue an arrest warrant for Amiott.
Nearly a dozen other states also allow private citizens to initiate criminal charges—including Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Texas and Idaho.
In all but one, however, the decision to actually file criminal charges is left to a prosecutor or grand jury. The exception is South Carolina, where police also have that power.
Testimony from people claiming to have witnessed something via social media can be problematic, cautions Seth Stoughton, a University of South Carolina law professor and former officer, since video posted online, even unedited, often provides limited information about an event.
"Beyond what they see directly in front of them, officers also rely on peripheral, aural and tactile information … That doesn’t always come across accurately, or at all, on video," said Stoughton, who writes extensively about police regulation and use of force. By definition, he added, social media witnesses will always have such limitations.
Some attorneys worry that the very community such individuals hope to protect could instead be negatively affected. Civil rights lawyer Maya Wiley, a former board chair of the NYC Civilian Complaint Review Board, an independent police oversight agency, warns of implicit bias in the criminal justice system that could favor a white social media witness over one of color.
(选自《华盛顿邮报》2019年1月5日) [br] The most proper title for this passage is________.
选项
A、Citizen’s Petition Against a White Policeman
B、The Power of Social Media Over Legal Community
C、Social Media "Witnesses" Raise Questions for Legal System
D、Social Media "Witnesses" Are Not Acceptable
答案
C
解析
主旨题。全文从社交媒体证人提起诉讼的事件说起,讨论了该行为给司法系统带来的问题,故正确答案为C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3918669.html
相关试题推荐
Canweforgeagainsttheseenemiesagrandandglobalalliance?A、dodgeB、create
Manystudentsagreedtocome,butsomestudentsagainstbecausetheysaidtheyd
CitingOhioordinancesthatallowindividualstoseekchargesagainstsomeon
CitingOhioordinancesthatallowindividualstoseekchargesagainstsomeon
CitingOhioordinancesthatallowindividualstoseekchargesagainstsomeon
CitingOhioordinancesthatallowindividualstoseekchargesagainstsomeon
CitingOhioordinancesthatallowindividualstoseekchargesagainstsomeon
CitingOhioordinancesthatallowindividualstoseekchargesagainstsomeon
Still,itwasnaturaltobeupsetwhensomeoneyouknowhasbeenbrutallymurder
[originaltext]Cyberattacksareontheincreaseagainsthomecomputeruserslar
随机试题
Doweneedlawsthatpreventusfromrunningriskswithourlives?Ifso,th
[originaltext]Analmost100-year-oldEnglishtextbookmightbetheearliest
OnNovember19,1863,AbrahamLincolnwenttoGettysburginPennsylvaniato
Inaneffortto(i)______herwriting,Laurenattemptedtoeliminatethe(ii)____
在项目组合管理中,对结构化的项目进行选择和优先级排序,一般会直接用到( )技术
下列关于募集行为管理的说法,错误的是()。A.委托募集不能豁免基金管理人依法应
女.45岁,发现胆囊结石2年。2小时前突发上腹剧痛,伴寒战、发热。体检:右上腹压
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性:
.甲和乙共同出资购买了一间房并出租给丙,租房期间甲欲转让自己的份额,乙和丙均表示
(2020年真题)企业提供建筑安装劳务,当履约进度不能合理确定、且已经发生的成本
最新回复
(
0
)