首页
登录
职称英语
Citing Ohio ordinances that allow individuals to seek charges against someon
Citing Ohio ordinances that allow individuals to seek charges against someon
游客
2025-01-18
9
管理
问题
Citing Ohio ordinances that allow individuals to seek charges against someone they’ve seen commit a crime, seven Euclid residents claim to have "witnessed" the encounter between Officer Michael Amiott and driver Richard Hubbard III by virtue of viewing a four-minute video on Facebook. Their unique argument has triggered discussion in the legal community about the role that "social media witnesses" could play in such cases.
"It used to just be the police officer’s word against the victim’s word," notes lead petitioner Richard T. Montgomery II. "Now, in the age of cellphone videos and social media, we as a community have the opportunity to participate in ensuring police accountability."
The racially and economically diverse group scored its first victory in late December when a municipal judge responded to its request by requiring the Cuyahoga County prosecutor to investigate Amiott for felonious assault during the August 2017 traffic stop.
The cellphone video, which has more than 11 million views on Facebook, shows the officer repeatedly punching Hubbard’s head as the 25-year-old man lay in the street. Separate video from a police cruiser’s dash cam shows Amiott wrestling Hubbard to the ground moments after he was ordered out of his car for a suspended driver’s license.
Amiott was fired two months later for excessive force. But in the majority-black city, emotions flared anew this October when he was rehired following an arbitrator’s ruling in his favor. The ensuing outcry included the NAACP announcing a travel advisory to people of color who might be driving through Euclid.
The legal issues raised by the citizens’ petition and the prospect of witnesses via social media are largely untested.
Cleveland attorney Rebecca Maurer, who wrote a popular blog about the "Serial" podcast’s recent focus on Cuyahoga County’s criminal justice system, expects such witnesses might have to first establish that they were somehow personally affected before being allowed to initiate charges.
"The judicial system relies on the idea of ’standing’ to regulate the type of cases that go to court," she said. "A judge who borrows from standing theory will want to know exactly why social media witnesses should initiate the case. Perhaps it’s enough if the petitioners are local residents claiming a personal stake in the security of their community."
In his ruling referring the matter to the county prosecutor, Euclid Municipal Judge Patrick Gallagher did point out that the petitioners fail to claim any "personal knowledge of Mr. Hubbard’s injuries." Had they done so, he could have taken more
drastic
action, the judge seemed to imply. Under Ohio law, Gallagher also could have used the citizens’ petition to circumvent the prosecutor’s office and issue an arrest warrant for Amiott.
Nearly a dozen other states also allow private citizens to initiate criminal charges—including Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Maryland, Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Texas and Idaho.
In all but one, however, the decision to actually file criminal charges is left to a prosecutor or grand jury. The exception is South Carolina, where police also have that power.
Testimony from people claiming to have witnessed something via social media can be problematic, cautions Seth Stoughton, a University of South Carolina law professor and former officer, since video posted online, even unedited, often provides limited information about an event.
"Beyond what they see directly in front of them, officers also rely on peripheral, aural and tactile information … That doesn’t always come across accurately, or at all, on video," said Stoughton, who writes extensively about police regulation and use of force. By definition, he added, social media witnesses will always have such limitations.
Some attorneys worry that the very community such individuals hope to protect could instead be negatively affected. Civil rights lawyer Maya Wiley, a former board chair of the NYC Civilian Complaint Review Board, an independent police oversight agency, warns of implicit bias in the criminal justice system that could favor a white social media witness over one of color.
(选自《华盛顿邮报》2019年1月5日) [br] The video taken by police’s cam showed Amiott ordered Hubbard get off his car because________.
选项
A、his driver’s license had been suspended
B、he drove over the speed limit
C、he is from a racially and economically diverse group
D、he refused to show his driver’s license
答案
A
解析
细节题。第4段最后一句,警察是因为Hubbard的驾照被吊销而命令他下车,故正确答案为A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3918663.html
相关试题推荐
CitingOhioordinancesthatallowindividualstoseekchargesagainstsomeon
CitingOhioordinancesthatallowindividualstoseekchargesagainstsomeon
CitingOhioordinancesthatallowindividualstoseekchargesagainstsomeon
CitingOhioordinancesthatallowindividualstoseekchargesagainstsomeon
CitingOhioordinancesthatallowindividualstoseekchargesagainstsomeon
Still,itwasnaturaltobeupsetwhensomeoneyouknowhasbeenbrutallymurder
IntheopeningsceneofStepUp2:TheStreets,someonevibratesunderneathasu
Itwouldbewrongto________someoneforerroneousremarksbecauseitisimpossib
[originaltext]Cyberattacksareontheincreaseagainsthomecomputeruserslar
[originaltext]Cyberattacksareontheincreaseagainsthomecomputeruserslar
随机试题
AdSlogansHowmanytimeshaveyou
A.累及主动脉全程 B.夹层只累及胸降主动脉 C.夹层只累及胸降主动脉及腹主
下列业务中,属于增值税征税范围的有( )。A.交通运输服务 B.物流辅助服务
Thechangeinthatvillagewasmiraculou
A.个案护理 B.功能制护理 C.小组护理 D.责任制护理 E.整体护理
主动脉瓣关闭不全可靠的诊断征象是A.X线显示左心房、左心室增大 B.心电图显示
某连续变量分为五组,第一组为40-50,第二组为50-60,第三组为60-
策略制定。所给出的资料有若干个问题要你回答。你应根据资料提供的信息进行分析、判断
在银行业的市场运营监管中,对银行的流动性进行监管的主要内容有()。A.监测银行对
乡村振兴的制度框架和政策体系初步健全是( )。 A.2020 B.2022
最新回复
(
0
)