首页
登录
职称英语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric p
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric p
游客
2025-01-14
16
管理
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a causal link" between extremely low- frequency electromagnetic fields those having very longwave-lengths--and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic--or even to lose sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report. " Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane. [br] The main idea of this passage is ______.
选项
A、studies on the cause of cancer
B、controversial view-points in the cause of cancer
C、the relationship between electricity and cancer
D、different ideas about the effect of electricity on cancer
答案
D
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3913144.html
相关试题推荐
Ingeneral,oursocietyisbecomingoneofgiantenterprisesdirectedbyabu
Ingeneral,oursocietyisbecomingoneofgiantenterprisesdirectedbyabu
Anindustrialsociety,especiallyoneascentralizedandconcentratedasthat
Anindustrialsociety,especiallyoneascentralizedandconcentratedasthat
Canelectricitycausecancer?Inasocietythatliterallyrunsonelectricp
Canelectricitycausecancer?Inasocietythatliterallyrunsonelectricp
Canelectricitycausecancer?Inasocietythatliterallyrunsonelectricp
Canelectricitycausecancer?Inasocietythatliterallyrunsonelectricp
Overthelast25years,Britishsocietyhaschangedagreatdeal--oratleas
Overthelast25years,Britishsocietyhaschangedagreatdeal--oratleas
随机试题
Asignificantnumberofpeopleseektoadoptchildrenfromothercountries,a
Intheword"unpredictable","pre-"isa(n)A、freemorpheme.B、boundmorpheme.C
关于代谢性碱中毒的特点,以下正确的是A.HCO{图}-/H{图1}CO{图2}<
下列叙述哪项符合溶血性贫血特点A.合成异常血红蛋白 B.红细胞存活期缩短,破坏
商业银行建立有效的声誉风险管理体系不包括以下哪项内容?(?)A.建设学习型组织
Icatchcoldnowandthen.A:always B:
以下关于总分类账户的说法,正确的有()。A.又称总账账户或总账 B.是总括的核
男性,65岁。陈旧性广泛前壁心肌梗死7年,活动后胸闷、心悸、气短2年,近1周出
吡喹酮的临床应用是A.短膜壳绦虫感染的治疗 B.血吸虫病、华支睾吸虫病治疗
对某化合物进行毒性评价时,检出该化合物的LD为160mg/kg体重,用定期递增剂
最新回复
(
0
)