首页
登录
职称英语
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric p
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric p
游客
2025-01-14
9
管理
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a causal link" between extremely low- frequency electromagnetic fields those having very longwave-lengths--and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as "a possible, but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic--or even to lose sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the Bush Administration, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilovolts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report. " Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane. [br] The view-point of the EPA is ______.
选项
A、there is casual link between electricity and cancer
B、electricity really affects cancer
C、controversial
D、low frequency electromagnetic field is a possible cause of cancer
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3913145.html
相关试题推荐
Ingeneral,oursocietyisbecomingoneofgiantenterprisesdirectedbyabu
Ingeneral,oursocietyisbecomingoneofgiantenterprisesdirectedbyabu
Anindustrialsociety,especiallyoneascentralizedandconcentratedasthat
Anindustrialsociety,especiallyoneascentralizedandconcentratedasthat
Anindustrialsociety,especiallyoneascentralizedandconcentratedasthat
Anindustrialsociety,especiallyoneascentralizedandconcentratedasthat
Canelectricitycausecancer?Inasocietythatliterallyrunsonelectricp
Canelectricitycausecancer?Inasocietythatliterallyrunsonelectricp
Overthelast25years,Britishsocietyhaschangedagreatdeal--oratleas
Overthelast25years,Britishsocietyhaschangedagreatdeal--oratleas
随机试题
RelationsbetweentheUnitedStatesandColombiasufferedformanyyearsbec
Cancellationoftheflight______manypassengerstospendthenightattheairpor
Whattopicarethemanandwomandiscussing?[br][originaltext]M:Ireallyapp
下列选项中,不属于被动式隔爆技术的是()。A.岩粉棚 B.水槽棚 C.水袋
土的密度试验须进行二次平行测定,取其算术平均值,相应平行差值不得大于0.02g/
某公司预计M设备报废时的净残值为3500元,税法规定的净残值为5000元,该公司
适合入选收入型组合的证券有()A.高收益的普通股 B.高收益的债券 C.高
几个学生正趴在树下兴致勃勃地观察着什么,一位教师看到他们满身是灰的样子,生气地走
某重力式挡土墙,墙高6m,墙背竖直光滑,墙后填土为松砂,填土表面水平,地下水与填
某工程在缺陷责任期内,因施工质量问题出现重大缺陷,发包人通知承包人进行维修,承包
最新回复
(
0
)