首页
登录
职称英语
David Landes, author of The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Ric
David Landes, author of The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Ric
游客
2025-01-01
36
管理
问题
David Landes, author of The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor, credits the world’s economics and social progress over the last thousand years to "Western civilization and its dissemination." The reason, he believes, is that Europeans invented systematic economic development. Landes adds that two unique aspects of Europeans culture were crucial ingredient in EUrope’s economic growth.
First, Landes espouses a generalized form of Max Weber’s thesis that the values of work, initiative, and investment made the difference for Europe. Despite his emphasis on science, Landes does not stress the notion of rationality as such. In his view, "what counts is work, thrift, honesty, patience, tenacity." The only route to economic success for individuals or states is working hard, spending less than you earn, and investing the rest in productive capacity. This is the fundamental explanation of the problem posed by his book’s subtitle: "Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor." For historical reasons—an emphasis on private property, an experience of political pluralism, a temperate climate, an urban style—Europeans have, on balance, followed those practices and therefore have prospered.
Second, and perhaps most important, Europeans were learners. They "learned rather greedily," as Joel Mokyr put it in a review of Landes’s book. Even if Europeans possessed indigenous technologies that gave them an advantage (spectacles, for example), as Landes believes they did, their most vital asset was the ability to assimilate knowledge from around the world and put it to use—as in borrowing the concept of zero and rediscovering Aristotle’s Logic from the Arabs and taking paper and gunpowder from the Chinese via the Muslim world. Landes argues that a systematic resistance to learning from other cultures had become the greatest handicap of the Chinese by the eighteenth century and remains the greatest handicap of Arab countries today.
Although his analysis of Europeans expansion is almost nonexistent, Landes does not argue that Europeans were beneficent bearers of civilization to a benighted world. Rather, he relies on his own commonsense law: "When one group is strong enough to push another around and stands to gain by it, it will do so." In contrast to the new school of world historians, Landes believes that specific cultural values enabled technological advances that in turn made some Europeans strong enough to dominate people in other parts of the world. Europeans therefore proceeded to do so with great viciousness and cruelty. By focusing on their victimization in this process, Landes holds, some postcolonial states have wasted energy that could have been put into productive work and investment. If one could sum up Landes’s advice to these states in one sentence, it might be "Stop whining and get to work." This is particularly important, indeed hopeful, advice, he would argue, because success is not permanent. Advantages are not fixed, gains from trade are unequal, and different societies react differently to market signals. Therefore, not only is there hope for undeveloped countries, but developed countries have little cause to be complacent, because the current situation "will press hard" on them.
The thrust of studies like Landes’s is to identify those distinctive features of European civilization that lie behind Europe’s rise to power and the creation of modernity more generally. Other historians have placed a greater emphasis on such features as liberty, individualism, and Christianity. In a review essay, the art historian Craig Clunas listed some of the less well known linkages that have been proposed between Western culture and modernity, including the propensities to think quantitatively, enjoy pornography, and consume sugar. All such proposals assume the fundamental aptness of the question: What elements of Europeans civilization led to European success? It is a short leap from this assumption to outright triumphalism. The paradigmatic book of this school is, of course, The End of History and the Last Man, in which Francis Fukuyama argues that after the collapse of Nazism in the twentieth century, the only remaining model for human organization in the industrial and communications ages is a combination of market economics and limited, pluralist, democratic government. [br] In discussing Landes’s work, the author’s tone is
选项
A、enthusiastic.
B、skeptical.
C、reproachful.
D、matter-of-fact.
答案
D
解析
态度题。在对Landes的作品进行介绍时,作者使用了诸如he believes,Landes adds,Landes bclieves Landes argues,Landes holds等客观引述的结构,全文沦述没有夹带作者自己的观点,未就 Landes的观点和作品进行任何评论,因此为客观引述,故D为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3893463.html
相关试题推荐
[originaltext]AtopUnitedNationsofficialhaswarnedthateffortstoreduc
[originaltext]AtopUnitedNationsofficialhaswarnedthateffortstoreduc
WHO,workingcloselywithitsMemberStates,otherUnitedNationsagenciesan
WHO,workingcloselywithitsMemberStates,otherUnitedNationsagenciesan
WHO,workingcloselywithitsMemberStates,otherUnitedNationsagenciesan
WHO,workingcloselywithitsMemberStates,otherUnitedNationsagenciesan
TheauthorofSisterCarrieis______.A、StephenCraneB、TheodoreDreiserC、Henry
GovernmentsAreTryingA1990UnitedNationssurvey
GovernmentsAreTryingA1990UnitedNationssurvey
GovernmentsAreTryingA1990UnitedNationssurvey
随机试题
"SocialReadjustmentScales"HolmesandRahedevelopedtheSocialReadjustmen
除张惠言外,常州词派中影响较大、在词论方面贡献较大的作家是()A.周济 B.张
生产经营单位不具备有关()、()或者()规定的安全生产条件的,不得从事生产经营活
女,33岁,左尺桡骨粉碎性闭合骨折,行手法复位小夹板固定后16小时,患肢持续剧烈
甲公司为深交所主板上市公司,李某系甲公司的实际控制人,乙公司系李某控制的一家企业
当工程施工的实际进度与计划进度不符合时,需要对网络计划作出调整,下列不属于调整的
华法林止血的作用机制是A:与钙离子络合 B:促进血小板聚集 C:使纤维蛋白原
普查的特点包括()。A.是一种全面调查 B.是一次性专门调查 C.工作量较大
A.糖浆 B.糖浆和滑石粉 C.胶浆和滑石粉 D.羟丙基甲基纤维素(HPM
银行承兑汇票的承兑银行,应当按照票面金额向出票人收取()的手续费。A:千分之一
最新回复
(
0
)