首页
登录
职称英语
By now, it should come as no surprise when scientists discover yet another c
By now, it should come as no surprise when scientists discover yet another c
游客
2024-12-29
14
管理
问题
By now, it should come as no surprise when scientists discover yet another case of experience changing the brain. From the sensory information we absorb to the movements we make, our lives leave footprints on the bumps and fissures of our cortex, so much so that experiences can alter "hard-wired" brain structures. Through rehab, stroke patients can coax a region of the motor cortex on the opposite side of the damaged region to pinch-hit, restoring lost mobility; volunteers who are blindfolded for just five days can reprogram their visual cortex to process sound and touch.
Still, scientists have been surprised at how deeply culture—the language we speak, the values we absorb—shapes the brain, and are rethinking findings derived from studies of Westerners. To take one recent example, a region behind the forehead called the medial prefrontal cortex supposedly represents the self: it is active when we ("we" being the Americans in the study) think of our own identity and traits. But with Chinese volunteers, the results were strikingly different. The "me" circuit hummed not only when they thought whether a particular adjective described themselves, but also when they considered whether it described their mother. The Westerners showed no such overlap between self and mom. Depending whether one lives in a culture that views the self as autonomous and unique or as connected to and part of a larger whole, this neural circuit takes on quite different functions.
"Cultural neuroscience," as this new field is called, is about discovering such differences. Some of the findings, as with the "me/mom" circuit, buttress longstanding notions of cultural differences. For instance, it is a cultural cliche that Westerners focus on individual objects while East Asians pay attention to context and background (another manifestation of the individualism-collectivism split). Sure enough, when shown complex, busy scenes, Asian-Americans and non-Asian—Americans recruited different brain regions. The Asians showed more activity in areas that process figure-ground relations—holistic context—while the Americans showed more activity in regions that recognize objects.
Psychologist Nalini Ambady of Tufts found something similar when she and colleagues showed drawings of people in a submissive pose (head down, shoulders hunched) or a dominant one (arms crossed, face forward) to Japanese and Americans. The brain’s dopamine-fueled reward circuit became most active at the sight of the stance—dominant for Americans, submissive for Japanese—that each volunteer’s culture most values, they reported in 2009. This raises an obvious chicken-and-egg question.
Cultural neuroscience wouldn’t be making waves if it found neurobiological bases only for well-known cultural differences. It is also uncovering the unexpected. For instance, a 2006 study found that native Chinese speakers use a different region of the brain to do simple arithmetic (3 + 4) or decide which number is larger than native English speakers do, even though both use Arabic numerals. The Chinese use the circuits that process visual and spatial information and plan movements (the latter may be related to the use of the abacus). But English speakers use language circuits. It is as if the West conceives numbers as just words, but the East imbues them with symbolic, spatial freight. "One would think that neural processes involving basic mathematical computations are universal," says Ambady, but they "seem to be culture-specific. "
Not to be the skunk at this party, but I think it’s important to ask whether neuroscience reveals anything more than we already know from, say, anthropology. For instance, it’s well known that East Asian cultures prize the collective over the individual, and that Americans do the opposite.
Ambady thinks cultural neuroscience does advance understanding. Take the me/mom finding, which, she argues, "attests to the strength of the overlap between self and people close to you in collectivistic cultures and the separation in individualistic cultures. It is important to push the analysis to the level of the brain. " Especially when it shows how fundamental cultural differences are—so fundamental, perhaps, that "universal" notions such as human rights, democracy, and the like may be no such thing. [br] A 2006 study found that______.
选项
A、both the Chinese and Westerners use the same part of the brain to do arithmetic
B、the Chinese use visual and spatial circuits while Westerners use language circuits
C、the Chinese conceive numbers as words while Westerners conceive numbers as symbols
D、neural processes involving basic mathematical computations are universal.
答案
B
解析
2006年的研究发现 。根据原文第五段,我们得知东西方人使用不同的大脑区域来进行算术;东方人倾向于视觉加工,而西方人倾向于语言加工;西方人把数字当作语言来加工,而东方人把数字当作视觉标志来进行加工;根据该段最后一句得知,大脑神经运作过程是因文化不同而不同的。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3889843.html
相关试题推荐
Mentalhealthprofessionalmaybesurprisedtodiscoverhowmuchishappening
Doingonethingmaymeananotherlikethecasemaybe.Theseare【M1】______
Doingonethingmaymeananotherlikethecasemaybe.Theseare【M1】______
Doingonethingmaymeananotherlikethecasemaybe.Theseare【M1】______
Doingonethingmaymeananotherlikethecasemaybe.Theseare【M1】______
Doingonethingmaymeananotherlikethecasemaybe.Theseare【M1】______
[originaltext]TheUnitedStateshasrecordedanotherhugemonthlytradedefi
[originaltext]TheUnitedStateshasrecordedanotherhugemonthlytradedefi
TheAntarcticisthemostremotecontinentandthelasttobediscovered,b
TheAntarcticisthemostremotecontinentandthelasttobediscovered,b
随机试题
TelevisionhastransformedpoliticsintheUnitedStatesbychangingtheway
比较随机抽样的供货商发票与采购订单,可以得出什么样的结论?A.没有收到重复发票。
下列关于资产评估委托合同的说法中,错误的是()。A、资产评估机构在法定情形下可
隐球菌性脑膜炎与结核性脑膜炎的临床主要区别是A、隐球菌性脑膜炎头痛、呕吐较剧烈
脓液绿黑稀薄者,其病机为( )。A.气血充足 B.气火有余 C.气血虚弱
下列药物不是来源于百合科的是A.浙贝母 B.黄精 C.玉竹 D.百
男性,48岁,左股骨开放性骨折,伤口不愈合2年,6个月前从伤口窦道排出小骨块2个
在适用刑事特别程序的下列哪些案件中,应当组成合议庭进行审理的是哪些?A.未成年人
下列关于过程性评估说法正确的是( )。A.团体心理咨询结束时的一项必须做的工作
苏州一新成立的服装生产企业向美国出口一批男式衬衣(检验检疫类别为m/n),纸箱包
最新回复
(
0
)