首页
登录
职称英语
By now, it should come as no surprise when scientists discover yet another c
By now, it should come as no surprise when scientists discover yet another c
游客
2024-12-25
11
管理
问题
By now, it should come as no surprise when scientists discover yet another case of experience changing the brain. From the sensory information we absorb to the movements we make, our lives leave footprints on the bumps and fissures of our cortex, so much so that experiences can alter "hard-wired" brain structures. Through rehab, stroke patients can coax a region of the motor cortex on the opposite side of the damaged region to pinch-hit, restoring lost mobility; volunteers who are blindfolded for just five days can reprogram their visual cortex to process sound and touch.
Still, scientists have been surprised at how deeply culture—the language we speak, the values we absorb—shapes the brain, and are rethinking findings derived from studies of Westerners. To take one recent example, a region behind the forehead called the medial prefrontal cortex supposedly represents the self: it is active when we ("we" being the Americans in the study) think of our own identity and traits. But with Chinese volunteers, the results were strikingly different. The "me" circuit hummed not only when they thought whether a particular adjective described themselves, but also when they considered whether it described their mother. The Westerners showed no such overlap between self and mom. Depending whether one lives in a culture that views the self as autonomous and unique or as connected to and part of a larger whole, this neural circuit takes on quite different functions.
"Cultural neuroscience," as this new field is called, is about discovering such differences. Some of the findings, as with the "me/mom" circuit, buttress longstanding notions of cultural differences. For instance, it is a cultural cliche that Westerners focus on individual objects while East Asians pay attention to context and background (another manifestation of the individualism-collectivism split). Sure enough, when shown complex, busy scenes, Asian-Americans and non-Asian—Americans recruited different brain regions. The Asians showed more activity in areas that process figure-ground relations—holistic context—while the Americans showed more activity in regions that recognize objects.
Psychologist Nalini Ambady of Tufts found something similar when she and colleagues showed drawings of people in a submissive pose (head down, shoulders hunched) or a dominant one (arms crossed, face forward) to Japanese and Americans. The brain’s dopamine-fueled reward circuit became most active at the sight of the stance—dominant for Americans, submissive for Japanese—that each volunteer’s culture most values, they reported in 2009. This raises an obvious chicken-and-egg question.
Cultural neuroscience wouldn’t be making waves if it found neurobiological bases only for well-known cultural differences. It is also uncovering the unexpected. For instance, a 2006 study found that native Chinese speakers use a different region of the brain to do simple arithmetic (3 + 4) or decide which number is larger than native English speakers do, even though both use Arabic numerals. The Chinese use the circuits that process visual and spatial information and plan movements (the latter may be related to the use of the abacus). But English speakers use language circuits. It is as if the West conceives numbers as just words, but the East imbues them with symbolic, spatial freight. "One would think that neural processes involving basic mathematical computations are universal," says Ambady, but they "seem to be culture-specific. "
Not to be the skunk at this party, but I think it’s important to ask whether neuroscience reveals anything more than we already know from, say, anthropology. For instance, it’s well known that East Asian cultures prize the collective over the individual, and that Americans do the opposite.
Ambady thinks cultural neuroscience does advance understanding. Take the me/mom finding, which, she argues, "attests to the strength of the overlap between self and people close to you in collectivistic cultures and the separation in individualistic cultures. It is important to push the analysis to the level of the brain. " Especially when it shows how fundamental cultural differences are—so fundamental, perhaps, that "universal" notions such as human rights, democracy, and the like may be no such thing. [br] What does "buttress" mean in the third paragraph?
选项
A、contradict
B、doubt
C、are unrelated to
D、support
答案
D
解析
原文第二段中the“me/mom”circuit的发现,表明文化背景和价值观会改变大脑结构。所以第三段中的“buttress”应该指“支持、强化”之意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3883562.html
相关试题推荐
WhatarethescientistsattheUniversityofCaliforniadoingtohelppatientsb
Accordingtothenews,whatmaybesignificanceofthediscovery?[originaltext]
Thenewsismainlyabout______.[br][originaltext]Scientistssaythatnig
Thenewsismainlyabout______.[originaltext]Scientistssaythatnighttime
ScientistsdiscoveredthegeneticsecretoftheBlackDeathby[originaltext]
Moststudiessuggestthatwhenwomenandmenshoulddothe(1)______samejo
Moststudiessuggestthatwhenwomenandmenshoulddothe(1)______samejo
Moststudiessuggestthatwhenwomenandmenshoulddothe(1)______samejo
Towhatshouldweattributethedifferencesinregionalcharacterandspeechin
______meansthatthegovernmentshouldmerelypreserveorderandprotectpropert
随机试题
Saks,611FifthAve.(MidtownEast/MurrayHill),near50thSt.,212-753-
实行学费补偿、国家助学贷款代偿和学费减免的年限计算,下列说法正确的是()A.按照
下列关于钢材的技术性能的相关说法中,正确的是()。A.钢材最重要的使用性能是力
长时间运动血糖下降时首先受影响的是()A.肺 B.肝 C.脑 D.心
阅读有关语感的研究论文节选,按照要求答题。 语感是对言语的直感,要想提升语
(2017年真题)关于基金信息披露的禁止性行为,下列说法错误的是()。A.
对焦虑症患者的心理护理,不恰当的是A、指导患者进行放松训练 B、鼓励患者倾诉内
当直流电源设备出现蓄电池组整组容量小于等于50%时,缺陷性质为()(A)一般缺
()是指先于学习任务本身呈现的一种引导性材料,它的抽象、概括和综合水平高于学习任
设计施工总承包合同履行过程中,()组织竣工验收。A.发包人 B.承包
最新回复
(
0
)