首页
登录
职称英语
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel ve
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel ve
游客
2024-12-16
23
管理
问题
On July 7th, I was traveling in London. I was having breakfast at a hotel very near Liverpool Street Station when the first explosion was detonated. Hearing the sirens and seeing London’s emergency personnel respond to the bombings brought back vivid memories of the events of Sept. 11, 2001.
People have not forgotten Sept. 11, 2001. Americans can still recall exactly where they were and what they were doing on that fateful day. But it’s understandable that some remember it as historical fact, lacking the painful impact and immediacy they originally felt. If we allow a dimming of purpose—to eliminate terrorism—these terrorist attacks in London serve as another chilling reminder that we’re still at war.
Something constructive emerges from these tragic, horrible and unexplainable attacks. It is the message that we must remain vigilant in opposing an enemy who intentionally targets innocent civilians.
Since Sept. 11, 2001, the civilized nations of the world have remained mostly united in opposing these despicable, wanton acts of terror. We have had some great successes in that effort. We have arrested perpetrators and plotters, and we have foiled planned attacks. We have reduced the power and scope of those who despise freedom and democracy.
The effort must continue. As we learned Thursday—and in Madrid and Bali—the enemies of freedom have not lost their resolve. We must not lose ours.
Ultimately, the only real defense from terrorist attacks is being able to find out about them in advance. Intelligence gathering has improved but needs to be even stronger, including consistently improving human intelligence and patrol. Police and ordinary citizens must be alert and encouraged to convey information.
Once a terrorist incident does occur, there’s no such thing as a perfect response. By definition, a terrorist attack means people are being hurt or killed. But by studying the response to past attacks, we can better prepare to handle those in the future.
London is one of the most secure cities in the world, steeped in years of dealing with terrorism. The city’s preparation and resolve was evident on Thursday. I am very impressed by London’s reaction to the bombings. Both the emergency personnel and the citizens seemed prepared. The first responders were rapid, well-directed, organized and professional, in accordance with obviously well-tested plans.
As for the citizens, at least a dozen people told me in one way or another, "We knew this was going to happen; it was just a question of when."
That is not only a realistic assessment; it also is a mindset that just might save lives. Political, business and community leaders are sometimes reluctant to talk about terrorism or stage drills to prepare their response because they don’t want to frighten or upset people. But that’s a mistake. People react to emergencies more effectively when they’re not shocked by them.
Tony Blair and London Mayor Ken Livingstone have made preparedness a priority, and their efforts clearly paid off during Thursday’s response to the attacks.
There’s another benefit to preparing for terrorism in advance. Part of the damage the terrorists hope to inflict is the emotional reaction in the wake of the destruction. The reason it’s called "terrorism" is that they want fear and its debilitating effects to linger long after the smoke has cleared.
By preparing citizens for the possibility of a terrorist attack, leaders can help minimize the emotional response in the wake of the destruction.
Finally, Thursday’s attacks demonstrate that we must remain committed to confronting and eliminating terrorism. There are those who assert that the efforts to eliminate terror are somehow provoking the terrorists. That is wrong. The terrorists have been attacking innocent people long before Sept. 11, 2001, or the wars in Afghanistan or Iraq.
Seeing Prime Minister Blair speak so forcefully, with President Bush, President Jacques Chirac and other world leaders right behind him, was encouraging. Let’s remember the unity the world shared after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
Free nations can and will disagree. But let us always remember that free people must be steadfast and resilient in defending our way of life. [br] A suitable title for the passage would be
选项
A、July 7th Terrorist Attack in London.
B、The war against terrorism.
C、Terrorism after Sept. 11, 2001.
D、Lessons from terrorist attack in London.
答案
D
解析
本文作者从伦敦恐怖袭击开始写起,接着回顾“9.11”恐怖事件,提醒人们恐怖主义分子依然猖狂,随后用大量篇幅阐述伦敦应对此次事件给我们的经验和教训,最后作者呼吁全世界的自由民族联合起来抵抗恐怖主义。全文主体是对伦敦7月7日恐怖袭击的反思和经验总结,因此选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3877059.html
相关试题推荐
OnJuly7th,IwastravelinginLondon.Iwashavingbreakfastatahotelve
OnJuly7th,IwastravelinginLondon.Iwashavingbreakfastatahotelve
OnJuly7th,IwastravelinginLondon.Iwashavingbreakfastatahotelve
Havingestablishedthe(social)natureofmanandtheconsequentnecessityfor
TheOldBaileyisthepopularnameofthe______,inLondon.Itisnamedaftert
Womenweremorelikelythanmentoreporthavingunderstandingsaboutsafer
Womenweremorelikelythanmentoreporthavingunderstandingsaboutsafer
Womenweremorelikelythanmentoreporthavingunderstandingsaboutsafer
Womenweremorelikelythanmentoreporthavingunderstandingsaboutsafer
HavingresidedinNewMexicoformanyyears,painterGeorgiaO’Keefeemployssuc
随机试题
【B1】[br]【B3】A、appearanceB、frameworkC、outlookD、structureA词义辨析。framework
发生火灾时,干式系统的闭式喷头受热开启,管道中的有压气体从喷头喷出,干式报警阀系
驾驶机动车遇有前方交叉路口交通阻塞时应怎么办?()A.可借对向车道通过 B.
男性,38岁,因吞咽困难,严重消瘦到医院就诊,食管吞钡检查示食管下段呈鸟嘴样改变
( )是指借款人无力或未按照约定按时还本付息或支付有关费用日寸贷款的第二还款来
分析毕加索的《格尔尼卡》。
阅读材料,回答下列问题。 《三峡》原文 自三峡七百里中,
施工合同文件中,优先于投标函及投标函附录的是()。A:中标通知书 B:专用合
共用题干 ADHDLinkedtoAirPollutantsChild
站用交流电源柜内,具有脱扣功能的低压断路器应设置一定()(A)阈值(B)冷却
最新回复
(
0
)