首页
登录
职称英语
Where does morality come from? Throughout the history of Western civilizatio
Where does morality come from? Throughout the history of Western civilizatio
游客
2024-11-22
28
管理
问题
Where does morality come from? Throughout the history of Western civilization thinkers have usually answered either that it comes from God, or else through die application of reason.
But in The Bonobo and the Atheist, primatologist Frans de Waal argues that there’s another answer that fits the data better: morality comes from our evolutionary past as a social primate(灵长目动物). Like our closest relatives, the apes, humans evolved in small, tightly knit, cooperative groups. As a result, again like the apes, we are exquisitely sensitive to one another’s moods, needs and intentions.
This well-developed empathy provided the trellis(框架)on which morality later flowered. De Waal, who is based at Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, has been making this case eloquently for many years and over several books, notably in Good Natured back in 1997, and in Primates and Philosophers, 12 years later.
In his new work, he bolsters(支持)the argument by drawing on a lot of new research, carefully footnoted for those who want to dig deeper. De Waal distinguishes two degrees of morality. The first he calls "one-on-one morality", which governs how an individual can expect to be treated, and the second "community concern" , a larger, more abstract concept that extends to the harmony of the group as a whole.
Chimps and bonobos certainly have the former—they respect ownership, for example, and expect to be treated according to their place in the hierarchy. But de Waal presents several examples—such as a chimp stepping in to stop a fight between two others—that suggest that they also have a rudimentary(初步的)form of the latter.
The book’s title, incidentally, draws on bonobos because they are more likely than chimps to behave morally, to have concern for each other, to value harmony and so on. This, imagines, de Waal, is something morally inclined atheists would want to emulate. If humans inherited morality from our ancestors, though, what are we to make of religion? Here de Waal moves into the territory he has not explored before. Clearly, religion must do something important, since every human culture has it. But instead of religion giving us morality, de Waal turns the tables. Morality, he argues, probably gave us religion as a way of reinforcing the pre-existing community concern.
If he’s right, then there may be no absolute code of right and wrong out there to be discovered. Instead, each individual’s evolved sense of empathy and concern for the group may help shape the group’s consensus on what kind of behaviour is appropriate. In short, says de Waal, morality may be something we all have to work out together. It’s a persuasive argument, and de Waal’s cautious and evidence-based approach is one that many New Scientist readers are sure to find congenial.
That careful approach is less evident in another book covering some of the same ground. In How Animals Grieve, anthropologist Barbara King sets out to explore the question of whether non-human animals grieve for their dead. It’s an intriguing question, but unfortunately King’s book is largely a succession of anecdotes: the cat who roams the house, crying, in search of its dead litter mate: the dog who waits daily at the train station for its dead master: a dolphin trying to keep her dead calf afloat for days.
Some of these stories make a persuasive case for some animals—especially apes, elephants and cetaceans— sometimes grieving. No surprises there: I suspect most readers would have conceded that ground right from the start.
But King makes little effort to dig any deeper by exploring, for example, the neural machinery and cognitive skills an animal needs in order to be capable of grief. After all, solitary species such as cats have less need for empathy—and its corollary, grief—than social animals, and small-brained creatures such as turtles may simply lack the brainpower or not form lasting pair bonds.
To his credit, de Waal takes full note of such distinctions: King, not so much. [br] The author find Barbara King’s book______.
选项
A、persuasive
B、surprising
C、suspicious
D、unconvincing
答案
D
解析
推断题。由题干中的Barbara King’s book定位至第九、十段。第九段最后一句提到,BarbaraKing的书主要是一系列轶事;此外,第十段最后一句作者明确指出他认为大多数读者会承认这本书从开始论述的就是一个既定事实,由此可知,作者认为Barbara King的书缺乏说服力,因此[D]为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3857170.html
相关试题推荐
Wheredoesmoralitycomefrom?ThroughoutthehistoryofWesterncivilizatio
AsChristmascelebrationsinWesterncountriesareinfullswing,Chinesepe
ThecultureoftheUnitedStatesisaWesterncultureoriginallyinfluenced
ThecultureoftheUnitedStatesisaWesterncultureoriginallyinfluenced
ThecultureoftheUnitedStatesisaWesterncultureoriginallyinfluenced
ThecultureoftheUnitedStatesisaWesterncultureoriginallyinfluenced
ThecultureoftheUnitedStatesisaWesterncultureoriginallyinfluenced
ThecultureoftheUnitedStatesisaWesterncultureoriginallyinfluenced
PeoplewhogrewupinAmericaandWesternEuropehavebecomeusedtotheide
PeoplewhogrewupinAmericaandWesternEuropehavebecomeusedtotheide
随机试题
Questions28-30ChoosetheappropriatelettersA-Dandwritetheminboxes28-30
Heboughtherwhatshewanted,______thefactthattheywerecostly.A、evenifB
在道路交通中,什么是行车视距?视距类型有那几种?
消除电磁式电压互感器饱和引起的谐振过电压措施有()。A.零序回路加阻尼电阻
某公司年初净投资资本6000万元,预计今后每年可取得税前净营业利润600万元,所
安装支架时,支架不得与()相连。A、模板 B、施工脚手架 C、拱架 D、临
按照方法不同,经营决策可划分为()。A:程序化决策 B:非程序化决策 C:定
与货币市场相比,资本市场的特点包括( )。A.期限较长 B.流动性较差 C
已开具的发票存根联和发票登记簿,应当保存3年;保存期满,报经税务机关查验后销毁。
哪个不是健康教育的作用( ) A.是实现初级卫生保健的先导 B.是卫生保健
最新回复
(
0
)