首页
登录
职称英语
Thirty years ago the Today program was unpredictable to the point of chaos w
Thirty years ago the Today program was unpredictable to the point of chaos w
游客
2024-10-28
6
管理
问题
Thirty years ago the Today program was unpredictable to the point of chaos with presenter Jack da Manio improvising and thinking aloud, always eager for a joke or a prank. Through the studio trooped a procession of English eccentrics a man who ate light bulbs, another who ate spiders, a chap who was touring the country leapfrogging all the pillar boxes, a hard-headed individual who could play Rule Britannia by hitting himself on the head with a nine-inch spanner and many others. Talking dogs and singing cats were almost commonplace.
By the mid-70s, however, Today had got to the point where, for example, it had on one morning Libby Purves making the first "live" radio broadcast from China, someone else in Dublin covering the pope’s visit, another presenter in Margate where the Liberals were conferring, and an anchorman in London.
When you have reached this stage, there is no room for talking dogs, and humor and whims have to be confined to odd corners.
Despite its more serious approach, however, Today has somehow retained its character and its tone of voice. And being a live, high-risk program, it can still go horribly wrong. Only recently an eminent doctor launched into a lengthy on-air harangue against the production team and refused to listen to the questions he was supposed to be answering. Such things can always happen and so can studio rows, sometimes even involving the presenters. There was a memorable spat not long ago when a rattled Nigel Lawson accused Redhead of being a well-known supporter of the Labor Party.
But rows or no rows, Today is where the ministers and would-be ministers want to be heard. As Brian Redhead is fond of saying: "If you want to plant a word in the nation’s ear, come on Today." His other favorite remark is: "We set the agenda for the day." Both statements are true of a program with a steady weekly audience of 6 million easily the largest on Radio 4. [br] Which of the following examples is given to show that the program sometimes does not go according to plan?
选项
A、Libby Purves had an argument with Nigel Lawson.
B、Someone hit himself on the head with a spanner.
C、Someone leapfrogged pillar boxes in the street.
D、A doctor declined to answer the set questions.
答案
D
解析
本题询问细节。对应的语句为“And being a live,high-risk program,it can still go horribly wrong.Only recently an eminent doctor launched into a lengthy on-air harangue against the production team and refused to listen to the questions he was supposed to be answering”。其中,
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3821400.html
相关试题推荐
ThirtyyearsagotheTodayprogramwasunpredictabletothepointofchaosw
ThirtyyearsagotheTodayprogramwasunpredictabletothepointofchaosw
ThirtyyearsagotheTodayprogramwasunpredictabletothepointofchaosw
Thecomputercanbeprogrammedto______awholevarietyoftasks.A、assignB、tac
Thefirecaused______casualties.[br][originaltext]Thirty-fourpatient
TheUnitedNationshaslaunchedanewprogramwithaviewto______povertyint
Whatistheaimoftheoil-for-foodprogram?[originaltext]TheUnitedNati
BynextSeptemberBritney______withthisuniversityforthirtyyears.A、willbe
Althoughhemadeseveralinventionswhenhewasveryyoung,______hewasthirty.
Mostpeopleexperiencecomputersas"end-users"ofpackagedprograms.Unfor
随机试题
Whatisthefirstthingpeopleshouldrememberiftheywanttomakeagoodprese
Howmenfirstlearnedtoinventwordsisunknown;inotherwords,theorigin
WhichofthefollowingstatementsisNOTtrue?A、HenryIIdidsomerenovationsof
Likeaneedleclimbingupabathroomscale,thenumberkeepsrising.In1991
股东大会作出修改公司章程、增加或减少注册资本的决议,以及公司合并、分立、 解散
对小肠描述正确的是A、分空肠和回肠2部 B、包括十二指肠,空肠和回肠3部分
根据马斯洛的需要层次理论()多选A.性的需要属于缺乏性需要 B.自我实现
选择全口义齿人工牙后牙时,需要考虑的因素中最重要的是A.覆盖、覆关系 B.提高
诊断结肠癌最可靠的依据是A:X线钡餐灌肠 B:血CEA检查 C:B超检查
"受试者根据自己的理解和感受对一些意义不明的图像、墨迹作出回答,借以诱导出受试者
最新回复
(
0
)