首页
登录
职称英语
Thirty years ago the Today program was unpredictable to the point of chaos w
Thirty years ago the Today program was unpredictable to the point of chaos w
游客
2024-10-28
14
管理
问题
Thirty years ago the Today program was unpredictable to the point of chaos with presenter Jack da Manio improvising and thinking aloud, always eager for a joke or a prank. Through the studio trooped a procession of English eccentrics a man who ate light bulbs, another who ate spiders, a chap who was touring the country leapfrogging all the pillar boxes, a hard-headed individual who could play Rule Britannia by hitting himself on the head with a nine-inch spanner and many others. Talking dogs and singing cats were almost commonplace.
By the mid-70s, however, Today had got to the point where, for example, it had on one morning Libby Purves making the first "live" radio broadcast from China, someone else in Dublin covering the pope’s visit, another presenter in Margate where the Liberals were conferring, and an anchorman in London.
When you have reached this stage, there is no room for talking dogs, and humor and whims have to be confined to odd corners.
Despite its more serious approach, however, Today has somehow retained its character and its tone of voice. And being a live, high-risk program, it can still go horribly wrong. Only recently an eminent doctor launched into a lengthy on-air harangue against the production team and refused to listen to the questions he was supposed to be answering. Such things can always happen and so can studio rows, sometimes even involving the presenters. There was a memorable spat not long ago when a rattled Nigel Lawson accused Redhead of being a well-known supporter of the Labor Party.
But rows or no rows, Today is where the ministers and would-be ministers want to be heard. As Brian Redhead is fond of saying: "If you want to plant a word in the nation’s ear, come on Today." His other favorite remark is: "We set the agenda for the day." Both statements are true of a program with a steady weekly audience of 6 million easily the largest on Radio 4. [br] Before the 1970s, the Today program used to be quite a______.
选项
A、serious program’
B、humorous program
C、religious program
D、political program
答案
B
解析
本题询问20世纪70年代前这档节目的风格。文章第一段讲述的是20世纪70年代以前的节目情况。由第一段的描述可知,那时的节目大多讲一些奇闻趣事。因此,用“humorous”来形容那时的节目内容较为恰当。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3821398.html
相关试题推荐
ThirtyyearsagotheTodayprogramwasunpredictabletothepointofchaosw
Thecomputercanbeprogrammedto______awholevarietyoftasks.A、assignB、tac
Thefirecaused______casualties.[br][originaltext]Thirty-fourpatient
WhenthepersoninvitedtoaliveTVprogramrefusestoanswerquestionstheon-
TheChinesespaceprogramaimsat______.[br][originaltext]Chinahasbe
TheChinesespaceprogramaimsat______.[originaltext]Chinahasbegunit
Whatistheaimoftheoil-for-foodprogram?[br][originaltext]TheUnite
Whatistheaimoftheoil-for-foodprogram?[originaltext]TheUnitedNati
BynextSeptemberBritney______withthisuniversityforthirtyyears.A、willbe
Althoughhemadeseveralinventionswhenhewasveryyoung,______hewasthirty.
随机试题
MiracleoftheForestWhenyouwalkintoaNation
下列保险产品中,不属于公众责任保险的是()。A.电梯责任保险 B
有线对讲系统中,主机可与任一分机通话,但各分机之间通常不能直接通话。()
下列选项中,( )是评估无形资产最为重要的技术方法,也是使用频率最高的技术方法。
左图为给定的多面体,从任一角度观看,下面哪项不可能是该多面体的视图? A.如上
下列选项中,属于肾分泌的非血管活性激素的是( )。A.促红细胞生成素 B.肾
公共文化服务需要“精准供给” 【背景链接】 “打卡”博物馆、美术馆,
根据下面资料,回答78-79题 假设IBM股票(不支付红利)的市场价格为50
引起胰岛素急性耐受的诱因哪一项是错误的?( )A.酮症酸中毒 B.严重创伤
若某项目达产年销售收入为1000万元(不含税),年可变总成本为300万元(不含税
最新回复
(
0
)