首页
登录
职称英语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against
游客
2024-10-04
8
管理
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence(过失)cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals. [br] What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the US.
B、History of the US railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本文主要介绍的是美国法院在铁路公司伤害案中的裁决,因此D是最佳答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3785882.html
相关试题推荐
Theideaofavacuumcleaneroriginatesfromthe19thcentury.Thefirstvac
Theideaofavacuumcleaneroriginatesfromthe19thcentury.Thefirstvac
AcenturyagointheUnitedStates,whenanindividualbroughtsuitagainst
The21stcenturyusheredinwhatwassupposedtobepaperlessliving.Theda
The21stcenturyusheredinwhatwassupposedtobepaperlessliving.Theda
The21stcenturyusheredinwhatwassupposedtobepaperlessliving.Theda
The21stcenturyusheredinwhatwassupposedtobepaperlessliving.Theda
[originaltext]AlthoughtheUnitedStateshasbeenshapedbycontinualwavesof
OncefoundalmostentirelyinthewesternUnitedStatesandillAsia,dino
OncefoundalmostentirelyinthewesternUnitedStatesandillAsia,dino
随机试题
Fewpeoplewouldeverthinkofbeginninganewjobwhentheyareold,butAn
Onceitwaspossibletodefinemaleandfemaleroleseasilybythedivision
ItwasmusictomyearstohearthattheGovernment’schiefadviseron【C1】__
Everyonemusthavehadatleastonepersonalexperiencewithacomputererrorby
工程竣工验收主持单位应在( )明确。A.可行性研究报告 B.开工报告 C.
下列属于安全生产须知内容的是()。A.进人施工现场,必须戴好安全帽、扣好帽带
下列不属于技术分析的假定的是( )A.股票价格围绕其内在价值波动 B.市场行
既清热燥湿,又杀虫、止痒、利尿的药物是()。A.黄连B.黄柏C.苦参D.黄芩E
A.血府逐瘀丸与妇科千金片 B.天王补心丹与朱砂安神丸 C.祛痰止咳颗粒与镇
某工程在建楼房倒塌,导致5名工人死亡,直接经济损失900万人民币。该生产安全事故
最新回复
(
0
)