首页
登录
职称英语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against
游客
2024-10-04
48
管理
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence(过失)cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals. [br] Which of the following is NOT true in Farwell’s case?
选项
A、Farwell was injured because he negligently ran his engine off the track.
B、Farwell would not have been injured if the switchman had been more careful.
C、The court argued that the victim had accepted the risk since he had willingly taken his job.
D、The court decided that the railroad should not be held responsible.
答案
A
解析
文章第3段第2句在介绍Farwell受伤时的情况时说,由于扳道工人的疏忽,他的引擎偏离了轨道.才使得Farwell失去了右手,这并不是由于Farwell本人的疏忽造成的,因此应选A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3785879.html
相关试题推荐
Theideaofavacuumcleaneroriginatesfromthe19thcentury.Thefirstvac
Theideaofavacuumcleaneroriginatesfromthe19thcentury.Thefirstvac
Theideaofavacuumcleaneroriginatesfromthe19thcentury.Thefirstvac
Theideaofavacuumcleaneroriginatesfromthe19thcentury.Thefirstvac
The21stcenturyusheredinwhatwassupposedtobepaperlessliving.Theda
The21stcenturyusheredinwhatwassupposedtobepaperlessliving.Theda
The21stcenturyusheredinwhatwassupposedtobepaperlessliving.Theda
WhataspectofUnitedStateshistorydoesthespeakermainlytalkabout?[br][
WhataspectofUnitedStateshistorydoesthespeakermainlytalkabout?[origin
OncefoundalmostentirelyinthewesternUnitedStatesandillAsia,dino
随机试题
[originaltext]What’sthepurposeofthemeeting?(A)Todiscussthenewpolicy.
Whichofthefollowingwouldbethebesttitleforthepassage?[br]Theyoungm
HowExerciseMakesYouSmarterExercisedoesmorethanbu
[originaltext]RallieswererecentlyheldinNewHampshire,Iowa,SouthCaro
钢结构主要应用于()。A重型厂房结构 B可拆卸结构 C低层建
下列征象,属于佝偻病X线表现的是:A.骺板先期钙化带不规则变薄、模糊 B.干骺
共用题干 第三篇OperationMigrationIfyoulook
我国《证券法》规定,收购要约的期限不得()。 A.少于30日,并不得超过45
对于非收发货人或其代理人原因造成少征或漏征税款的,海关可以自缴纳税款或者货物放行
关于施工中产生的固体废物污染环境防治的说法,正确的是( )。A.施工现场的生活
最新回复
(
0
)