首页
登录
职称英语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against
游客
2024-10-04
9
管理
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence(过失)cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals. [br] Which of the following is NOT true in Farwell’s case?
选项
A、Farwell was injured because he negligently ran his engine off the track.
B、Farwell would not have been injured if the switchman had been more careful.
C、The court argued that the victim had accepted the risk since he had willingly taken his job.
D、The court decided that the railroad should not be held responsible.
答案
A
解析
文章第3段第2句在介绍Farwell受伤时的情况时说,由于扳道工人的疏忽,他的引擎偏离了轨道.才使得Farwell失去了右手,这并不是由于Farwell本人的疏忽造成的,因此应选A。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3785879.html
相关试题推荐
Theideaofavacuumcleaneroriginatesfromthe19thcentury.Thefirstvac
Theideaofavacuumcleaneroriginatesfromthe19thcentury.Thefirstvac
Theideaofavacuumcleaneroriginatesfromthe19thcentury.Thefirstvac
Theideaofavacuumcleaneroriginatesfromthe19thcentury.Thefirstvac
The21stcenturyusheredinwhatwassupposedtobepaperlessliving.Theda
The21stcenturyusheredinwhatwassupposedtobepaperlessliving.Theda
The21stcenturyusheredinwhatwassupposedtobepaperlessliving.Theda
WhataspectofUnitedStateshistorydoesthespeakermainlytalkabout?[br][
WhataspectofUnitedStateshistorydoesthespeakermainlytalkabout?[origin
OncefoundalmostentirelyinthewesternUnitedStatesandillAsia,dino
随机试题
[originaltext]M:Howdidyoudoontheexam?W:Ipassed,butIdidn’tdosowe
Itwasn’tsuchagooddinner______shehadpromisedus.A、thatB、whichC、asD、wha
AreyousearchingtheInternettofindthebestplacetobookaroomforyou
Althoughonemightnotthinksofromsomeofthecriticismofit,advertisin
A.现病史 B.个人史 C.主诉 D.既往史 E.家族史急性肺炎患者,既
对货币供应量有决定性影响的因素有( )。 Ⅰ.贸易收支 Ⅱ.外汇收支 Ⅲ
载脂蛋白功能不包括A.构成并稳定脂蛋白的结构B.修饰并影响脂蛋白代谢有关的酶的活
能溶于5%NalHCO溶液的是A.2'-羟基黄酮 B.5-羟基黄酮 C.4'
依据高压熔断器运维细则管理规定,高压熔断器更换应使用()的熔断器。价格便宜
男,40岁,腰痛伴右下肢放射痛2个月,反复发作,与劳累有关,咳嗽、用力排便时可加
最新回复
(
0
)