首页
登录
职称英语
(1)Who has never heard of King David? There are probably not too many Christ
(1)Who has never heard of King David? There are probably not too many Christ
游客
2024-09-15
19
管理
问题
(1)Who has never heard of King David? There are probably not too many Christians who have not heard of King David. What many Christians probably do not realize is that, until recently, other than David’s occurrence in the Bible, there has never been actual proof that he ever existed. Over the years this has given fuel to certain groups wishing to view the Bible as a huge trip into the allegorical. However, all of this changed in 1993. Recently, your author learned for the first time what I am going to attempt to tell about here. You might think that given your faith, it doesn’t really matter whether there is proof of David or not. But think for a moment of the implications of our Bible being definitively proven by actual physical evidence. It would be like having your cake, and someone putting icing on it!!!
(2)In 1993(as told in the March/April 1994 issue of Biblical Archaeology Review), Avraham Biran and his team of archaeologists unearthed a piece of stone with fragments of writing on it. In the writings was the words "House of David". It was the first mention of David in ancient inscription outside the Bible. The fragment was found at Tel Dan which lies by the head waters of the Jordan River, near Israel’s northern border.
The large piece of basalt was part of what must have been a large monumental inscription. It contains 13 lines, but no single line is complete. The surviving letters are clear, however. Line 9 contains the words "House of David". After the complete translation, it was determined that the fragment was part of a victory stela erected in Dan by an Aramean boasting a military victory over the House of David. Many questions are raised as well as many possibilities upon comparing the fragment with the Biblical history. For instance the victory of the Aramean would conflict with the episode in the Bible. However as BAR points out, there were probably many battles and not all were recorded in the Bible. We do know that Israel must have regained control of Dan. This find would perhaps seem simple and to the point, but that is far from the truth. The find began a debate in earnest.
(3)Immediately following the find, many came forward to state that the stone did not actually mention the "House of David." Along with this claim came the accusation that those believing that it did mention David were "Biblical Maximizers." The arguing was fast and furious. The debate inspired letters to the editors displaying the anger, emotion, and dismay from Christians. How could this new proof be denied? While the verbal debate raged, researchers and scientists quietly built a case on the very evidence the naysayers demanded. Another scholar, Andre’ Lemaire wrote an article in BAR stating that there was another mention of David in an earlier find. It was called the Mesha Stela proclaiming victory for the Moabite king Mesha over the Israelites.
(4)Then in the Impact section of our own The State in December of last year, an article appeared proclaiming that scientists have found that the Bible is built on facts as well as faith. Many fragments have been found in the same area, all mentioning David. Finally, scholars have reached the consensus that David was real, something many of us have never doubted, even before the stelas were found. Although scholars are not ready to admit the Bible is historically true across the board, they are willing to concede that the "Bible has a sound historical core." One thing is certain, these finds don’t only have repercussions in a religious sense, they reach into many domains—political, personal faith, historical. I can’t say in learning about these finds that my faith has grown any stronger, I can say that I have a new appreciation for the Bible as an accurate historical record as well as a basis of faith. [br] The author is most likely to agree that ______.
选项
A、it doesn’t really matter whether there is proof of David or not(Para. 1)
B、the stone did not actually mention the ’House of David.’(Para. 3)
C、the Bible is built on facts as well as faith(Para. 4)
D、Bible is historically true across the board(Para. 4)
答案
C
解析
原文最后一句中的historical record as well as a basis of faith表明作者认为《圣经》是以历史事实和信念为基础的,这与C的内容相同。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3759484.html
相关试题推荐
PASSAGEFOUR[br]WhyareicebergsfromtheSouthPoleprobablyeasiertotransp
Howwelookandhowweappeartoothersprobablyworriesusmorewhenweare
Howwelookandhowweappeartoothersprobablyworriesusmorewhenweare
PASSAGETHREE[br]WhatareAyrshireandGallowaymostprobablyfamousfor?Their
(1)WhohasneverheardofKingDavid?ThereareprobablynottoomanyChrist
(1)WhohasneverheardofKingDavid?ThereareprobablynottoomanyChrist
(1)WhohasneverheardofKingDavid?ThereareprobablynottoomanyChrist
Theword"open"isreallyusedalot.You’veprobablyheard"openup"inman
FamousChristmasPlacesTherearemany【T1】______traditionsinChristmas.【T
FamousChristmasPlacesTherearemany【T1】______traditionsinChristmas.【T
随机试题
21.ThechildrenaregettingmoreandmoreexcitedwhenChristmasis______nea
Fromherconversation,I______thatshehadalargefamily.A、deducedB、decided
[originaltext]TheJapaneseMinistryofHealth,LabourandWelfarereleasedthe
HowWorkWillChangeWhen
以下关于博客营销的叙述中,错误的是( )。A.与门户网站发布广告和新闻相比,博
应急预案能否在应急救援中成功的发挥作用,不仅取决于应急预案自身的完善程度,还依赖
在混凝土坍落度试验中,如期落度筒提起后底部有较多析浆析出,则表示()。A.
子宫颈癌分期:浸润已达阴道下1/3,宫旁浸润已达盆壁为A:Ⅱa期 B:Ⅱb期
邓小平曾经指出:“港澳、台湾、海外的爱国同胞,不能要求他们都拥护社会主义,但是至
总承包单位如果用自备电源(如柴油发电机组)解决用电问题时,应(),同时要妥
最新回复
(
0
)