首页
登录
职称英语
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial,
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial,
游客
2024-09-15
20
管理
问题
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective. But are all smoking bans equally successful?
The barkeep and blogger who writes as "Scribbler50" was outraged when, in 2003, New York City enacted one of the first comprehensive smoking bans in bars and restaurants; "How can a guy and some board just kick us in the teeth like this? This smacks of fascism. " If people are aware of the consequences of smoking or visiting places with lots of secondhand smoke, should the government really have to tell us what to do? Won’t people just vote with their feet and smoke even more when they’re at home and away from restrictions?
Scribbler50’s post inspired the physician who blogs as "PalMD" last week to look up the research on the effectiveness of smoking bans. He found several studies showing that not only did workers in restaurants and bars show improved health shortly after the bans were put in place, but smokers themselves also reduced the number of cigarettes they smoked.
Overall, however, smoking rates remain persistently high, despite the common workplace smoking bans. Can other government measures help these smokers live healthier lives, or at least prevent people from taking up the habit?
In the U. S. , warning messages have been in place on cigarette packages for decades. But the messages are rather clinical, for example; "Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, And May Complicate Pregnancy." What if packages contained more dramatic warnings? In January, psychologist and science writer Christian Jarrett looked at a small study of smokers’ reactions to cigarette warnings. The researchers measured self-esteem in student smokers, then showed them cigarette packages with either death-related warnings("Smckers die earlier")or esteem-related warnings("Smoking makes you unattractive"). Students who derived self-esteem from smoking and saw the death-related warnings later viewed smoking more positively than those who saw the esteem-related warnings. For students whose smoking wasn’t motivated by self-esteem, the effect was reversed.
So not all anti-smoking messages are equal: Depending on who the message is directed at, a morbid(病态的)warning on a cigarette label may actually backfire.
Scribbler50, for his part, is now a convert favoring smoking restrictions, at least in his narrow limits as a bartender. His patrons who haven’t quit smoking say they smoke a lot less now that they have to go outside to get a nicotine fix. He doesn’t miss emptying ashtrays, or the holier-than-thou(自以为是的)customers who complained every time a fellow patron lit up, or working in a smoke-filled bar all night and going home "smelling like you put out a three-alarm".
Would it be right to enact even more restrictions on smoking in the interest of public health? It’s hard to deny that banning smoking in public, indoor spaces has been a huge success. Why not try out some stronger smoking bans? Parents in some areas are already restricted from smoking in cars with children, but I haven’t seen a study that evaluates the success of those measures. Perhaps a state or municipality could try extending the ban to homes, with provisions for studying the results. It’s also possible that stronger measures would be counter-productive, like the stronger warnings on cigarette labels. Maybe we’ll decide that at some level deciding whether or not to smoke should still be an individual choice. Or maybe in a few generations, it won’t be necessary to regulate smoking: There won’t be any smokers left. [br] According to the passage, what is Scribbler50?
选项
A、A physician.
B、A psychologist.
C、A science writer.
D、A bartender.
答案
D
解析
根据第二段第一句The barkeep and blogger who writes as“Scribbler50”…以及第七段第一句Scribbler50…at least in his narrow limits as a bartender可知,Scribbler50是[D]“酒保”。[A]“内科医生”指的是第三段第一句中受Scribbler50的启发以PalMD为名写博客的人;[B]“心理医生”和[C]“科普作家”指的是第五段中的Christian Jarrett,均不符合题意,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3758953.html
相关试题推荐
PASSAGEONEGovernment-fundedresearcheswerebannedfromcontroversialtopics第三段
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,
Municipalbansonsmokinginrestaurantsandbarsarehighlycontroversial,
Smokingis_______inpublicbuildings.A、avoidedB、prohibitedC、rejectedD、repel
A:MayIsmokehere?B:Ifyou_______,chooseaseatinthesmokingsection.A、sho
BanonPublicSmoking1.GoalinspeakingAbanofsmokingfrom【T1】______2.
BanonPublicSmoking1.GoalinspeakingAbanofsmokingfrom【T1】______2.
BanonPublicSmoking1.GoalinspeakingAbanofsmokingfrom【T1】______2.
BanonPublicSmoking1.GoalinspeakingAbanofsmokingfrom【T1】______2.
随机试题
IntheUnitedStatesandinmany【51】countriesaroundtheworld,therearefo
【B1】[br]【B4】therefore→however语篇逻辑错误。本句前一个分句指出:在这两种区分之后的观点是主观标准不会获得最大满足。第二个分句的意
Asweknow,ifwewanttokeepourhealthyandhaveastrongbody,oureatin
Thefollowingisalistoftermsrelatedtomarketing.Afterreadingit,youare
关于运输合同的说法,正确的是()。A.收货人和托运人任何情况下都不是同一人
基于本量利分析的利润敏感性分析主要研究的问题包括( )。A.有关因素发生多大变化
在蛋白质测定方法中,利用蛋白质具有重复肽键结构特点设计的血清总蛋白质测定方法是(
隔离开关机构箱应设置可自动投切的驱潮加热装置,定期检查驱潮加热装置运行正常、投退
教师职业道德行为的出发点是() A.教师职业正义感B.教师职业责
下列关于目标控制计划的说法中,正确的有()。A、计划不仅是工程实施的依据,也是对
最新回复
(
0
)