首页
登录
职称英语
A New Approach to DebateI. Teachers’ hesitation: debate
A New Approach to DebateI. Teachers’ hesitation: debate
游客
2024-09-01
2
管理
问题
A New Approach to Debate
I. Teachers’ hesitation: debate is beyond students’【T1】 ________ 【T1】 ________
II. Suggestions from Prof. Charles Lebeau to teachers
a) Begin with controlled practice: to【T2】 ________ opinions and arguments 【T2】 ________
b) Caution: no【T3】 ________ topics 【T3】 ________
Ⅲ. "Discover Debate" Approach
- Team members: depending on the【T4】 ________ of students 【T4】 ________
- The first stage: creating a【T5】 ________ aid 【T5】 ________
- The second stage: presenting arguments
- The third stage: answering the【T6】 ________ argument 【T6】 ________
a) Pause for the opponents to develop answers or【T7】 ________ 【T7】 ________
b) Evaluate arguments: to look for【T8】 ________ 【T8】 ________
c) Write easily remembered【T9】 ________ 【T9】 ________
- Ending: ask for audience【T10】 ________ 【T10】 ________ [br] 【T7】
A New Approach to Debate
[1]Teachers of English may hesitate to teach debate because they think it is beyond their students’ language ability, or proficiency. But debate can be a powerful tool. It can help students learn to speak naturally and to listen carefully.
Professor Charles Lebeau teaches English and debate in Japan. He wrote "Discover Debate" with Michael Lubetsky. The book helps English teachers and learners understand how to carry on a simple debate.
The "Discover Debate" approach has three stages: creating a visual aid to communicate an argument, presenting the argument and answering the other team’s argument. Each stage puts increasing demands on language ability. It begins with a pre-debate experience.
When teaching debate to English learners, Mr. Lebeau recommends beginning with "controlled practice." Students work in pairs to practice saying opinions and giving reasons in short conversations. [2]They learn to identify opinions and arguments about everyday topics, such as sports stars, foods, weather and habits.
[3]Teachers may be tempted to give students serious topics, such as "People should stop using nuclear power." However, Mr. Lebeau cautions that English learners may not have the necessary language ability to handle such topics. More serious topics often require special vocabulary and research.
Mr. Lebeau’s classes in Japan are like many in universities; they have 40 to 50 students. [4]He has students form debate teams of three or six, depending on the total number of students. [5]Each team creates a visual aid to show their thinking on the topic. The visual is a house: a roof represents an opinion, pillars are the reasons supporting the opinion and the foundation is the evidence.
In the next stage, students present their argument They have to do some talking, but not too much.
[6]The third stage is answering the opponents’ argument. Here, debaters need a higher level of language ability. [7]Mr. Lebeau recommends pausing for the opposing team to develop their answers, or refutations. Each team might go to a different area and discuss the weak points in the opposing argument. Students must first think about the arguments carefully. In "Discover Debate," Michael Lubetsky and Charles Lebeau include a guide to help students evaluate arguments. The evaluation also takes advantage of the visual aid of a house. [8]Students are asked to look for flaws, or problems. They identify things that are either "not true" or "not important."
[9]Students can write easily remembered abbreviations on their opponents’ houses: "NT" for not true. "NAT" for not always true, or "NNT" for not necessarily true. These simple expressions make it easier for students to refute their opponents’ arguments.
Traditional debate includes several cycles of presentation and refutation. For English learners, one cycle of presentation and refutation is usually enough practice. Mr. Lebeau says sometimes he asks the rest of the class to vote on which side won. [10]Asking for audience feedback gives the lesson a good ending. But, he says, additional discussion depends on the situation and the level of the students.
选项
答案
refutations
解析
本题与第三阶段反驳对方观点相关。录音提到:“勒博先生建议暂停让对方辩友构思答辩或者辩驳”,因此填入refutations。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3738516.html
相关试题推荐
Alanarguedthatthebestteachersshouldberewardedwithsalariesonaparwit
Theroll-callsystemhasbeencommonlyadoptedbycollegeteacherstochecks
CanTeachingGrammarReallyBeFun?【T1】______amongaverageteachers【T1】___
CanTeachingGrammarReallyBeFun?【T1】______amongaverageteachers【T1】___
CanTeachingGrammarReallyBeFun?【T1】______amongaverageteachers【T1】___
CanTeachingGrammarReallyBeFun?【T1】______amongaverageteachers【T1】___
CanTeachingGrammarReallyBeFun?【T1】______amongaverageteachers【T1】___
ANewApproachtoDebateI.Teachers’hesitation:debateisbeyondstudents’
ANewApproachtoDebateI.Teachers’hesitation:debateisbeyondstudents’
ANewApproachtoDebateI.Teachers’hesitation:debateisbeyondstudents’
随机试题
Thesurveyshowsthat__________________(现在去国有企业就职的想法对年青人没有多大的吸引力).theideaof
ForwhichofthefollowingisJuliusCaesarnotknown?A、InvadingBritain.B、Bein
Sportisnotonlyphysicallychallenging,butitcanalsobementallychalle
在数字计算中,下列说法错误的是()。A.加减运算中,有效数字以小数点位数最
工地试验室试验检测结果的真实性和准确性由工地试验室负责。()
根据所给资料,回答下列问题。 2009年全国海洋生产总值31964亿元,比上
关于ETF,以下描述不正确的是( )。A.申购、赎回的开放时间为交易日的交易时
(2015年真题)木蝴蝶除了清热利咽外,还可( )。A.散风 B.凉血 C
2016年1月甲居民企业以800万元直接投资乙居民企业,取得股权40%。2017
C
最新回复
(
0
)