2. 职称英语
  3. (1) The American economy is in a befuddling state. Firms are on a six-year h

(1) The American economy is in a befuddling state. Firms are on a six-year h

游客2024-08-24  55
问题     (1) The American economy is in a befuddling state. Firms are on a six-year hiring spree that shows little sign of abating; payrolls swelled by an average of 190000 a month between May and July. Competition for workers is pushing up wages. The median pay rise in the year to July was 3. 4％, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta. Americans are spending that cash; in the second quarter, consumption per person grew at an annual pace of 5. 5％, equaling its fastest growth in a decade. Yet real GDP is expanding by only 1.2％ a year. The culprit seems to be business investment, which has fallen for three consecutive quarters. If firms are hiring and consumers are spending, why is investment weak?
    (2) There are three potential explanations for this widespread reluctance to invest. The first is weak demand for the firms’ goods. This explains exporters’ restraint, given lacklustre global demand and a pricey dollar. But it makes less sense at home, with consumer spending strong, and firms happy to hire and to raise wages.
    (3) The second is tighter credit. Since the Federal Reserve raised interest rates in December, the average rate banks charge firms to borrow is up by about half a percentage point. After five years of loosening standards, more banks have tightened than eased credit standards for business lending in 2016, according to a Fed survey. In February, financial-market turmoil caused credit spreads in bond markets, the best measure of credit conditions, to surge.
    (4) Yet it is unlikely that slightly tighter credit has substantially crimped investment, because American firms are flush with cash. At the end of last year they had $1.7 trillion on hand, enough to pay for Hillary Clinton’s infrastructure plan six times over (though much of this cash is held overseas for tax reasons). Indeed, firms are accumulating cash at the fastest rate since July 2011, according to the Association for Finance Professionals, an industry group.
    (5) That leaves the third explanation: that in spite of strong spending, slow trend growth is reducing opportunities for profitable long-term investments. On this view, the recent downturn in business investment was less of a cyclical blip than a sign of things to come.
    (6) Economies get bigger when they add people or get more from their existing workforce. America is doing less of both. The Bureau of Labour Statistics projects that the labour force will grow by an average of 0.5％ a year from 2014 to 2024, down from 1.2％ annually from 1994 to 2004, because of ageing baby-boomers and low fertility. And productivity growth has stalled. From 2005 to 2015, output per hour worked grew by only 1.3％ a year, down from growth of 3％ a year between 1995 and 2005. In the year to the second quarter of 2016, productivity actually fell, by 0.4％.
    (7) Optimists argue that this is part of a lengthy hangover from the recession, which should soon end. One contributor to productivity is the amount of capital—for example, machinery or computers— that each worker has at their disposal. The recession sent this ratio soaring as firms laid off workers and left machines sitting idle. Why would firms invest again before they had replenished their payrolls? But this explanation is becoming less convincing. The capital-to-worker ratio returned to its long-run trend in 2014 (the last year for which data are available). It is past time for productivity growth to have recovered; instead, it is sinking further.
    (8) Pessimists think the productivity problem is chronic. Technological advances, they say, are ever-less revolutionary: Uber is less of an advance than the car itself, the smartphone has not changed office work the way the PC did. Nonsense, reply "techno-optimists", who foresee huge advances in machine learning and robotics.
    (9) For now, the data support the pessimists. The best measure of technological advance is total factor productivity, which measures output after controlling for both the number of workers and the amount of capital. In 2015 it grew by just 0.2％, compared with an average of 1.1％ in the two decades prior to the financial crisis.
    (10) Businesses anticipating slower long-term growth cannot be expected to invest much. And politicians cannot easily conjure up technological progress. But they can boost competition, simplify taxes and regulation, and invest in infrastructure and education, all of which would help to raise American productivity. (本文选自 The Economist) [br] The following are all ways for politicians to raise American productivity EXCEPT________.
选项 A、boosting competition
B、simplifying taxes and regulation
C、investing in infrastructure and education
D、conjuring up technological progress
答案 D
解析 细节题。原文最后一段提到，政治家无法轻而易举地幻化出技术进步，但他们可以促进竞争，简化税收和监管，投资基础设施和教育，这些都有助于提高美国的生产率。可见，作者认为A“促进竞争”、B“简化税收和监管”、C“投资基础设施和教育”均为提高美国生产率的方式，但政治家们不能凭空创造出科技进步，故D为答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3732912.html
相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)