首页
登录
职称英语
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are
游客
2024-08-01
31
管理
问题
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish government’s now infamous, since "fat tax" has caused an international uproar. It’s praised by public health advocates on the one hand and dismissed on the other as a nanny state whose social engineering has gone violent.
I see it as one country’s attempt to stave off rising obesity (肥胖症) rates, when other options seem less feasible. But the policies appear confusing. Why Denmark of all places? Why particular foods? Will such taxes really change eating behaviour? And aren’t there better ways to halt or reverse rising rates of diet-related chronic (慢性的) diseases?
Before getting to these questions, let’s look at what Denmark has done. In 2009, its government announced a major tax overhaul aimed at softening the shock of the global economic crisis, promoting renewable energy, protecting the environment, discouraging climate change, and improving health—all while maintaining revenues, of course. The tax reforms make it more expensive to produce products likely to harm the environment and to consume products potentially harmful to health, specifically tobacco, ice cream, chocolate, candy, sugar-sweetened soft drinks, and foods containing lots of fats.
Taxes pay for this through policies that maintain a relatively narrow gap between the incomes of the rich and the poor. Because its level of income disparity (差异) is relatively low, the effects of health taxes are less hard on the poor than in many other countries. But the Danes want their health to be better. Life expectancy in Denmark is 79 years, at least two years below that in Japan or Iceland. The stated goal of the tax policies is to increase life expectancy as well as to reduce the burden and cost of illness from diet-related diseases. [br] In the author’s opinion, what is the purpose of Denmark’s exerting "fat tax"?
选项
A、To attract public advocates.
B、To set up a nanny state.
C、To stave off rising obesity rates.
D、To change medical conditions.
答案
C
解析
根据题干中的"fat tax"定位到第一段第三句。本句到本段末句指出目前丹麦政府因征收“脂肪税”而变得臭名昭著,并已经引起国际骚动,毁誉参半。第二段首句则指出作者认为它是一个国家想降低日益增长的肥胖率的尝试。it指上一段提出的“脂肪税”,因此C)最合理。
转载请注明原文地址:https://tihaiku.com/zcyy/3701561.html
相关试题推荐
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyare
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyare
EnviablyhealthyDenmarkisleadingthewayintaxingunhealthyfood.Whyare
Giveupsmoking.Your(healthy)______willimprovesoon.health根据原句中的语法要求,物主代词yo
Noonetodayneedfeardangerousmaterialsinlipsticks.AstudybyaleadingGe
Inordertostayhealthy,itisagoodidea______yourdoctoratleastonceay
Ibas—CenterofExcellenceIbasisoneoftheworld’sleadingcompaniesinDataR
Exercisescanhelpuskeep(health)______.healthy句子意为:运动可以帮助我们保持健康。本题测试词性变化。kee
Giveupsmoking.Your(healthy)______willimprovesoon.health根据原句中的语法要求,物主代词yo
Normallyawell-mixeddietcansupplythevitaminsnecessaryforahealthybody.
随机试题
[img]2022m3x/ct_ve01202001m_eillist_0540_220329[/img][br][originaltext]Hello
Consumersarebeingconfusedandmisledbythehodge-podge(大杂烩)ofenvironmen
Nowastothematteroflying.Youwanttobeverycarefulaboutlying;other
不属于影响硅肺发病的因素是()A. B. C. D.个体因素 E.
行政事业单位会计是以权责发生制为基础。()
有关小腿慢性溃疡的手术治疗措施,下列不正确的是A.彻底清除局部坏死组织 B.肉
A.D细胞 B.主细胞 C.黏液细胞 D.壁细胞 E.G细胞胃黏膜中分泌
机体内环境的稳态是指 A.细胞内液理化性质保持不变B.细胞外液理化性质保持不
根据民事法律制度的规定,下列各项中,属于民事法律行为中的处分行为的是( )。A
银行承兑汇票的承兑银行,应当按照票面金额向出票人收取()的手续费。A:千分之一
最新回复
(
0
)